YTMND Search

 (5.00)

Arabic mythology, not Islamic mythology. REPTILIAN POWER!

 (5.00)

Hi there, [b]i’m pilleater[/b], princess of ytmnd.<br />This is my hubby [b]SantabotAi[/b], the most awesome ytmnd user in the universe.<br />[b]Fabulous upvote powers[/b] reveal to me the day I held and lost my virginity <br />and sang…<br /><br />Twenty-five years and my life is still
<br />Trying to get up that great big hill of hope<br />
For a destination<br /><br />I realized quickly when I knew I should<br />
That the world was made up of this brotherhood of man<br />
For whatever that means<br />...<br /><br />And so I cry sometimes
<br />When I'm lying in bed just to get it all out
<br />What's in my head
<br />And I, <br />I am feeling a little peculiar<br /><br />And so I wake in the morning
<br />And I step outside<br />
And I take a deep breath and I get real high<br />
And I scream from the top of my lungs
<br />What's going on?<br /><br />And I say, hey yeah yeah, hey yeah yeah
<br />I said hey, what's going on?<br /><br />And I say, hey yeah yeah, hey yeah yeah
I said hey, what's going on?<br /><br />[b](pichu)[/b]And I try, <br /><br />oh my god do I try
<br /><br />I try all the time, in this institution<br /><br />[b](superdreamkilla):[/b] And I pray, oh my god do I pray<br />
I pray every single day<br />YEAH<br />
For a revolution.<br /><br />And I say, hey hey hey hey<br />hey hey hey hey<br />
I said hey, what's going on?<br />And I say, <br /><br />DON'T<br />JUST KEEP IT INSIDE<br />LEARN HOW TO HIDE YOUR FEELINGS.<br /><br />(Max in bed ignoring ytmnd party)hey hey hey hey
I said hey, what's going on?Oh, oh oh oh----Twenty-five years and my life is still
Trying to get up that great big hill of hope
For a destination

 (5.00)

I didn't realize that particular song was a cover, but I had heard that, yeah. They are one of those bands I liked a lot in highs school, but don't have as much staying power, in my mind, as a lot of other bands from the 90's. I still like a few songs, but they have a lot more shitty songs than good songs anyway, imho.

 (0.00)

Lets go over your claim that [i]"that whole point of creating the Federal Reserve System was that "free market" instability was killing people and ruining their lives,"[/i]<br /><br />This was the public statement written by the bankers themselves or an equivalent statement. One thing I will agree with is that yes, in freer markets, there is much more instability of certain kinds. But that is mostly instability for producers. Meaning that one individual producer, as time goes on, has to face more and more new competitors who likely have better understandings of new technology and production methods. The older producer (especially if a large corporation) often has a lot of years of accumulated dead weight and bureaucracies which make it harder for it to adjust itself to be competitive with newer and more agile companies.<br /><br />Is there instability for the consumers as well? Yes, the consumers have the ability to buy ever increasingly affordable products and services at a better quality from newer firms. Nowadays, we see this quite frequently with software, video games, televisions, computers, cameras, mobile phones. There are also other occurances, like with Uber and Lyft vs the old taxi companies. Today, some mobile phones have more computing power than a lot of desktops from even just 5 to 10 years ago.<br /><br />Even if we set aside this logic and modern day examples, all the related economic charts actually seem to show (between 1865 or end of US Civil War and 1914) that the alleged instability in banking you speak of was actually a good thing. Prices were falling for consumer goods. More and more people were able to afford some basic things we take for granted today. Exports from the USA were on the rise compared to imports. The industrial index grew. Technology improved. People joyously immigrated to the United States by the millions and sometimes made even enough money to send back to their home countries.

 (0.00)

Obviously, any sane person would not count slavery as being among freedom, which ended in the USA and most other countries around the world before even 1900, most of those that did, decades earlier. I also never said that the USA or England were perfect examples of minarchism or anarchism. I simply have been saying that they were a lot closer than now and had much better and more consistent upward economic growth, technological growth, social improvement, etc. They also had a currency which increased in value and was able to buy more goods for the same dollar prior to the federal reserve.<br /><br />Were there poor people in those days, say around 1890 who had a hard time getting good healthcare in the USA or UK? Sure. But what country in that time would have done better? Something tells me (without looking it up) that I would have rather been a poor person trying to get it in the USA or UK in 1890 rather than in Russia, India, Mexico, Africa, etc.<br /><br />[i]"And, hey fuckwad, that whole point of creating the Federal Reserve System was that "free market" instability was killing people and ruining their lives, you shit-for-brains-on-a-stick. Get it?: IT WASN'T WORKING!! "[/i]<br /><br />Thanks, but I am already aware of the official government line. Which was co-written by great guys like JP Morgan, Nelson Aldrich and other bankers. Just thought I would inform you, governments lie sometimes, usually in their own favor.<br /><br />What I find so tragic and ironic about the left is that they are mostly smart enough to know better and are skeptical or outright angry when governments start illegal wars or when they increase police powers, reduce civil liberties, work with big corporations to form monopolies, abuse the homeless, have judicial misconduct, have unjust drug or alcohol laws or working with religious fanatics like Rick Santorum. However, they believe all the government lines about banking.

 (0.00)

"You are naming the US "mostly prior to World War II" as an example of "wealth for the average person...superior healthcare system" while ignoring not one but multiple depressions (more than 40, by some methods)"<br /><br />Actually I'm not. I thought that I clearly implied that World War I had more economic freedom. I guess not. Times prior to World War I had more overall personal and economic freedom within the west. You could literally buy any drug you wanted to. You could buy any form of booze you wanted to. You could easily start a business with little money in your pocket, without worrying about filling out paperwork from and paying fees to 15 government agencies. You could go anywhere on earth without a passport. If you wanted to come to immigrate to America, you just had to survive the boat ride with no horrible disease.<br /><br />The most noteworthy depressions occurred long after the federal reserve, some added regulations from the Wilson era, some added regulations starting with Hoover, continuing well after Franklin Delano Roosevelt grew the government by leaps and bounds. Virtually all the economic disasters you speak of occurred almost always when the government was at it's then record for largest and most powerful.<br /><br />Even the 19th century panics (which were far tinier than anything happening after Wilson) coincided with government measures like imposing greenback money, or imposing national banks on the public, or some large scale war or some other scandal involving government.

 (0.00)

The only problem is that people are deluded enough to allow a government to remain which has the power to tax. These professional parasites then tax all the growing wealth and eventually grow to super strong governments. This is what happened with the USA and UK, and yes, even the Nordic countries.

 (0.00)

Problems with Starship Troopers the movie:<br />1. IRL wars since WWI do not have infantry as frontline forces. Since then, the trend has been increasingly artillery shots, then aircraft, then tanks, then lighter vehicles (like APCs, Infantry Fighting Vehicles and helicopters, THEN infantry mops up what is left). So, why, in the future, which would logically have even less risky situations for infantry would they actually increase their role, let alone make them frontline?<br /><br />2. Why would said infantry not have weapons that could NOT eliminate the enemy in about one shot? What is strange that even the Doogie Howser actor points out that the bugs need a million shots, unless you hit them in a special place. In the heat of war, hoping to hit a very tiny place is extremely unlikely. Especially when they are ridiculously outnumbered.<br /><br />3. What the hell is wrong with the sergeant who threw a knife at the hand of a private? This is supposed to be a protagonist? What I thought was crazier was his justification on practicing knife throws:<br /><br />"[Zim throws a knife and hits Ace's hand pinning it to the wall] <br />Career Sergeant Zim: The enemy can not push a button... if you disable his hand. Medic! "<br /><br />This scene made no sense whatsoever. The alien bugs used neither knives nor nukes. This scene might as well been about practicing scuba diving warfare. Even if the bugs used knives, guns are way more powerful. And if the knives were for the humans, even standard assault rifles needed 100 shots to take down a bug. A knife would be a joke. If this scene was to highlight what a tough nut the sarge was, that would still not be a good enough excuse. Full Metal Jacket and other military movies displaying aggressive drill sergeants have them doing things which actually make sense.<br /><br />4. Why didn't the forces of Earth just nuke the damn aliens?

 (0.00)

This site is more powerful than Ambien. zzzzzzzzz

 (4.00)

Yeah, you're right. I should have, as "avant-garde" is a terrible word to describe radical cultural production practices as it merely internalizes and embodies the violent, disciplinary rhetoric (and power) of the neoliberal State. It is a military term denoting, connoting, and identifying with conservative bodies and apparatuses of control that should never have been used by or for "radical" practices. That is, there is nothing "radical" or resistant about reifying State and hegemonic biopolitics, whether through language or action.

 (5.00)

The babe with the power?

 (5.00)

Should have been, "How many LEVELS of POWER, VEGETA?".

 (5.00)

One of his lesser known powers, make a johnny walker red bottle last forever.

 (3.00)

Your feeble skills are no match for the power of the 7-year-late comment

 (5.00)

Besides, the biggest instigators of WW2 were arguably either almost completely statist (Soviet Union) or mostly statist (Germany, Italy and Japan).<br /><br />Vietnam was neocon paranoia about their "dominoes" theory.<br /><br />All these examples are aggressive state uses of power. Capitalism is about markets and trade. I really wish all these countries DID rely on markets and trade instead of acting like angry 5 year olds with mass destructive weapons.

 (3.00)

Umfuld, c'mon! You're savvier than this. By responding to his tangential bullshit as though anything mDS has posted on this page has any relevance at all, you've not only allowed him to derail the conversation from the original topic to whatever retarded agenda he thinks he's posting about but, worse, you've given him basis for his false pretense that he is in fact engaging equally in participatory debate. He isn't. He might as well have started off by "arguing" that asteroids travel faster than Priuses and more efficiently, too. Who cares if it's correct or incorrect or whatever--it's entirely irrelevant to the conversation; it's tantamount to crap spam trolling, it's so stupid; and it completely destroyed an otherwise nuanced discussion between people who were not shitting out retarded copy-pasta from entrenched binary positions like two chimps throwing Red State and Blue State feces at each other. I may be unproductive and obnoxious in my vitriolic attacks but you are actually feeding him a steady diet of troll pellets, as witnessed by the fact that, through your response to him, he successfully dumbed down and shifted a decent conversation to whatever the fuck his binary understanding of, well, he thinks he's talking about politics and forms of governance, but we [i]were[/i] talking about economics and the hegemony of economic power, so fuck, I dunno. Might as well give him a hand job while yr at it and reward him for being so fucking ugly, too.

 (1.00)

What a surprise, the [b]FAGGOT!!![/b] catholic perpetual virgin with no irl friends is online again, as always, still posting shitty site after shitty site and still downvoting hundreds of comments after hundreds of comments, as that's the only "attention" or "power" he's got in his entire sad hermetic future pedophilic priest life.

 (5.00)

really he has that power and he chose that of the 2 choices of he had in front of him?

 (5.00)

[i]I am now a 26 year old man who isn't quite as anti social and miserable as I used to be but I still have some work to do. I haven't been here in years but I came back for this day.[/i]<br /><br />Your a fucking idiot your the fucking same as you were 10 fucking years ago wow, the diff? because i am more "social." thats everybodys reasonm the world dosent revolve around you you faggot. Now your happy? fuck you your just a power hog because you have an income and buy more shit you like and have sex.<br /><br />[i]I was an anti social 16 year old who hated a lot of things but loved stupid internet humor.[/i]<br /><br />it must to been hilarious back then because you were a fucking retard to begin with you probley liked bad emo music and halo or some gay anime shite go fuck yourself. <br /><br />its fucking funny because this is the gay shit i go up agiasnt on ytmnd and its fucking pricks like you that get into power and make younger feel like shit plu your not honest with yourself and your a fucking liar fuck you you faggot dont post here again. 2006 gay ass faggot.

 (5.00)

Farts are powering YTMND.

 (0.00)

The<br />TL494<br />device<br />incorporates<br />all<br />the<br />functions<br />•<br />Complete<br />PWM<br />Power-Control<br />Circuitry<br />required<br />in<br />the<br />construction<br />of<br />a<br /><br />Uncommitted<br />Outputs<br />for<br />200-mA<br />Sink<br />PWM<br />control<br />circuit<br />on<br />a<br />single<br />chip.<br />Source<br />Current<br />Designed<br />primarily<br />for<br />power-supply<br />control,<br />this<br />•<br />Output<br />Control<br />Selects<br />Single-Ended<br />or<br />device<br />offers<br />the<br />flexibility<br />to<br />tailor<br />thepower-supplycontrolcircuitrytoaspecificapplication.Push-PullOperation•InternalCircuitryProhibitsDoublePulseatTheTL494devicecontainstwoerroramplifiers,anEitherOutputon-chipadjustableoscillator,adead-timecontrol(DTC)comparator,apulse-steeringcontrolflip-flop,a•VariableDeadTimeProvidesControlOver5-V,5%-precisionregulator,andoutput-controlTotalRangecircuits.•InternalRegulatorProvidesaStable5-VTheerroramplifiersexhibitacommon-modevoltageReferenceSupplyWith5%Tolerancerangefrom–0.3VtoVCC–2V.Thedead-time•CircuitArchitectureAllowsEasycontrolcomparatorhasafixedoffsetthatprovidesSynchronizationapproximately5%deadtime.Theon-chiposcillatorcanbebypassedbyterminatingRTtothereferenceoutputandprovidingasawtoothinputtoCT,oritcandrivethecommoncircuitsinsynchronousmultiple-railpowersupplies.Theuncommittedoutputtransistorsprovideeithercommon-emitteroremitter-followeroutputcapability.TheTL494deviceprovidesforpush-pullorsingle-endedoutputoperation,whichcanbeselectedthroughtheoutput-controlfunction.Thearchitectureofthisdeviceprohibitsthepossibilityofeitheroutputbeingpulsedtwiceduringpush-pulloperation.TheTL494Cdeviceischaracterizedforoperationfrom0°Cto70°C.TheTL494Ideviceischaracterizedforoperationfrom–40°Cto85°C

 (5.00)

turtle power

 (0.00)

Vagina Power ;)

 (1.00)

Then KHANdalf the Grey and KHANdalf the White and Khanty Khanthon and the Holy Khan's Khan Knight and Khannito Khanssolini and the Khan Meanie and Khanboy Khantis and Khanbi the Genie, RoboKHAN the Khaninator, Captain Khan and Khan Vadre, Lo Khan, SuperKhan, Every single Power KHANger, Khan S. Khanston and Khanodore Logan, Khan, the Khan, Khan Khan, and Khan HoKHAN all Khanned out of nowhere lightning fast, and they kicked poor Fourest in his FAGGOT!!!! ass

 (4.00)

Ahhh yes... the power of pussy

 (0.00)

Political parties. Morality. Class equality. Economics. Crime. Corruption. Innocence. Fairness. Survival. Comfort. Safety.<br /><br />Timeless, endless struggles of humanity. Confusing, overwhelming, unsolvable problems.<br /><br />I'm not highly educated, but I'm not stupid.<br /><br />I observe, listen and watch everyone but I rarely debate or participate.<br /><br />All I know is that everyone is basically looking out for their own interests, wether they realize it or not. <br /><br />Anyone who claims to know everything and has it all figured out is usually either dead wrong or just lying (in part or in full to themselves and/or to others).<br /><br />Still, one has to take a stand somewhere and choose a side to some extent. <br /><br />I'm no anarchist. I agree we need a society, government and police. But I also hate the inherent, unavoidable corruption and abuse that comes with it.<br /><br />But I'm also half expecting society to crumble at any moment. I try to rely on the system as little as possible. I don't drive a car, I'm somewhat of a preper, I try to stay off the grid as much as possible, while still taking advantage of it as much as possible (a difficult balance).<br /><br />Bottom line is that everyone is an animal. Sometimes territorial and fierce, sometimes communal and bonding. But always wanting to dominate their surroundings using any means at their disposal, be it money and power, emotional subterfuge or brute force.<br /><br />I don't have it all figured out, but I do know you have to be damn careful out there and you can't really trust anyone. Not a stranger, not a family member, not a cop, not a president. <br /><br />Except that there are times when you have no choice. That's the rub.

 (0.00)

Because I somentimes dislike the actions, content and comments of certain users to the point where I might selectively punnish them more frequently than I would someone I like who might break the same rules.<br /><br />I try to be as fair and honest as I can, but I recognize that I can't always be because I'm a little judgmental at times.<br /><br />Sometimes I catch it and correct it. Like I used to give PDE a hard time because I didn't like that how he talked over his sites. Later I realized I was just being a twat and stopped.<br /><br />I think the best way for me to avoid passing judgment prematurely is to not have any power over anyone.

 (5.00)

ha! I agree! Give power to the Community members! plus methods to ignore those stupid cyberbullies... I know Pewdie Pie would approve :). Max, I'm all in on this! Please implement :D!!!!

 (0.00)

Reading directly from the power point word for word - 10

 (2.00)

THAT'S IT!!! [i]THAT'S[/i] exactly what you are like. A fucking hall monitor. Absolutely no actual power or essential service but [i]totally[/i] self-impressed and groan-inducingly smug. Congrats, moron, you you nailed it.