YTMND Search

 (0.00)

I constantly make fun of you for never leaving this site gr33nscr33en. At no point did I say I would be gone for good. My point was that I can leave the site for weeks or even months at a time. Something you can't do. You also check if people replied to your posts, days or weeks later. You make me laugh at how bent out of shape you get. You actually seem to give a sh*t. You'll probably reply to this again, since you can't let anything go. Same can be said for your alts, i mean your friends.

 (5.00)

You think that it might actually be a filter to mess them up? would Max do something like that?

 (5.00)

I knew Pehistoric Dinosaur would have something to do about this

 (5.00)

You're acting as if all he did for the ending was simply take some scene from Back to the Future where Marty walks in somewhere, sees something, and is surprised. That would not take as much creativity as piecing this scene together himself.<br /><br />Although you're right the ending could be better. Maybe he could also have Marty saying "If only I had more time... Wait a minute I've got all the time I want, I got a time machine! I can just go back early and warn him... Ten minutes ought to do it." Then he goes back but still is too late, sees Stephen Hawking get shot by Lybians, Marty says "NOOOOOOOOO, BASTARDS!" Then sees his past self come in and say "I have been looking all over for you... Great Scott!" then his past self travels back in time, and then he rolls down the hill and sees Stephen Hawking survived by wearing a bullet proof vest. "Bullet proof vest... How did you know?" To which Stephen Hawking replies in his TTS voice "WELL I FIGURED, WHAT THE HELL"

 (4.00)

hey man<br /><br />for your next site, you should have an old woman walking across the street in NYC. half way across the street, she fires up a jetpack and launches into the sky with epic music playing.<br /><br />that site would be as basically unfunny as this site right here. it would function on "SURPRISE!! woah, old ladies dont use jetbacks," and GUESS WHAT?!?!?!? you wouldnt even need to reference old memes like silly/funnytalking foreign arnold doing something random. it would be just as unfunny - but hey, it would be kind of original.

 (0.00)

Nah its basically documenting what im learning as I learn it..what after effects isnt basic once you learn how to use the program..<br />Wow factor has nothing to do with it..since you are obviously very limited on ytmnd..if i wanted to impress people I would sign up on youtube or something and be practically unrestricted..if your so keen on trying to see right through people maybe you should figure yourself out first..cause assumption can be a hell of a bad thing

 (0.00)

Well first of all, I've said this before, but something being a direct rip in and of itself doesn't make it bad. The original YTMND could be considered a direct rip. However a lot of them are simply not funny. And that's what it really comes down to - I vote based on whether or not I find sites to be entertaining or amusing. I find a lot of old classic fads to be funny, so I make sites with them and upvote other sites with them. As for what "deserves to be featured on the front page", most of my sites only appear on recently created and fall off once enough new sites are made. Occasionally I'll get on U&C but I'll inevitably be gone after at most a few hours. It seems pretty odd to complain about my sites being on the front page. And finally, you seem to think that I am afraid to make a mainstream style YTMND, but has it ever occurred to you that I simply don't want to? I don't find most of those kinds of sites funny or entertaining, so why would I make something just to get views and ratings if I don't find it personally interesting? Occasionally I make something similar to what is popular, like that "You are being shagged by a rare parrot" site (which did get on U&C for a while), but that was only because I thought that clip was hilarious when I saw it so I decided to preserve it YTMND style. Simply a coincidence that it was popular. But seeing as you want me to go out, find some clip from some 70s or 80s TV show, rip it, and post it on YTMND, I'm not going to do that just because it's what the cool kids do. I mean, if I'm watching a video and I see something hilarious I might make a YTMND out of it, but mostly I stick to my roots and my personal style. You don't have to like it, but other people do, and you should accept that.

 (3.00)

I'm disappointed. I figured this would have something to do with age of empires...

 (1.00)

Ok, while you're technically not plagiarizing anything, you aren't using the source to do something original. I could fill a paper with only excerpts from other sources but that would be terrible and bring nothing new to the table.<br /><br />Anyway, my point is that this isn't digg. Don't just repost Re: Re: Re: Fwd: Re: Check out this fune vid! emails you get from your dad.<br /><br />Also there's is absolutely nothing angry in my writing. I'm just tired of seeing direct rips from other places of the internet without adding anything.

 (0.00)

Im not sure what repost of this pizzone site you speak of, and for that matter what comment of yours you speak of either. i do believe you are on some sort of mind altering drug but if you'd like to offer any proof of those claims beyond your words or the testimony of a moon crew member, since said testimony would be biased, then id be happy to listen to them. this site was made because i believe that the moon crew is the cancer that is killing ytmnd and the sooner they are banned the better. so i suppose it is a retaliation but not against something that only exists in your twisted little mind but against the moon crew and their collective stupidity, redundancy, and communism. good day.

 (0.00)

Also, Trivialis, meaning in Latin "Three roads" literally, actually meant "Street Corner". Trivialis also came to mean "Street Knowledge" in the same sense that we use that phrase now. So, something trivial was something common. This eventually changed to something that is so easy anybody can do it. Things would be dismissed as trivial (and thus not worth discussing). Trivia is the plural of trivial. So, it's a collection of things that have little or no point in talking about.

 (1.00)

If you plan on sticking around to make another site, I want to share a bit of quick advice. Do you remember the terms you agreed to before starting work on this site? It would be a very good idea to heed those terms. No, your sites probably won't get deleted, but you [i]will[/i] have a greater likelihood at getting downvoted by the YTMND community. The stuff found at chan/gifbin websites and myspace/facebook pictures are the last things we want to see here. So if you do want to stick around, try making something original. I would personally love to see what you can do.

 (5.00)

? WRONG AGAIN! I reached 20000 and needed something new; some new idea that would keep my interest and my focus in the midst of my longest hunt ever.<br /><br />The idea was filming encounters for Ponyta while listening to music at the same time. It keeps me excited, interested and most of all, able to put up with filming and charging all day. Plus, the thought of getting a shiny with awesome music in the background really added to the inspiration.<br />So, I started this and got up to 23000. Never the less, all my hope was already gone and only focus remained. I had a duty to do; and I was starting to like this new method of hunting, with the epic music and all.<br /><br />Every time I was tempted to hunt without the camera, this weird feeling from inside kept telling me to film and listen while encountering. But, when I got to 25000, I started to lose hope. But all the people on YouTube kept predicting and that pushed me as well.<br /><br />And today, I get it. I was losing my focus at 25940 encounters (because there was no way it would shine before 26000. I was just hurrying up and encountering (Sorry if my singing annoys you). But, my longest hunt EVER ended 28 encounters later (10 on each game).<br />After a grand total of 230 days (December 2nd, 2009 to July 19th, 2010), 25968 encounters (25970) if you count each and every encounter, my shiny finally appeared! And it was Ponyta too!<br /><br />[A whole bunch of people predicted when he'd finally find the thing; I removed the list for space]<br /><br />So, I would like to congratulate TheVipersRKO1 for predicting the closest.<br /><br />The song in the video is -- No Reason, by Sum41<br /><br />I do not own the song in this video, it is just used for entertainment. I am not making any kind of profit on this video whatsoever.<br /><br />Thanks for watching everyone!

 (5.00)

you should of asked me to do the sound so this could be an awesome ytmnd collab and so i would have actually given something to this site in the recent past

 (0.00)

It wouldn't be a Starfox On Drugs would it? Plus, I am not patient enough to do something like that usually. Maybe sometime in the future. MAYBE.

 (0.00)

The same could be asked of the 67% that voted for Montford. How many of the 99,000 people that voted for him do you think understood [i]his [/i]positions? In fact, go to his website and find me one single position of his on any major political issue out there. (Education aside, since he has served in education for over 30 years.) Let me know if you find anything about any issues, or any possible solutions or ideas he perhaps has. The same argument can be made the other way around -- while "pot heads and people that vote for anyone with an "R" next to their name" might have earned me a significant amount of votes, an [b]overwhelming [/b]majority of ignorance must have accompanied those who went to the polls to vote for Montford. Why? Because no one had a clue what he stood for. Every speech he gave consisted of something like, "What we need in the Senate is strong, effective leadership." No substance whatsoever.<br /><br />I'm guessing roughly 20% of the people who voted for me were aware of my platform, judging from the number of public speaking engagements I attended, the amount of press surrounding the election (quite limited), the amount of advertising I did, and the number of unique visitors on my website. The rest of course would either be those who simply did not like Montford, those who voted straight Republican, or those who simply did not care. I doubt, however, that any significant number of them were "potheads" (aren't Republicans supposed to be anti-pot, anyways?)<br /><br />Montford spent about $475,000. I spent every penny of what was donated to me.<br /><br />I am curious as to what your position is on hemp. You say you don't want to debate me on it, but, as I have not heard a single logical argument [i]against [/i]the legalization of hemp ("We have more important issues to talk about" is not an argument), I would greatly appreciate your insight.

 (4.00)

This particular element doesn't necessarily affect my vote, but I do feel there is some inconsistency in the elements of this site. <br /><br />Star Wars + Cartoon Thwang + Price Is Wrong Tuba + Thwomp = Jumbled Mess<br /><br />Perhaps an anvil in lieu of a thwomp would be more appropriate considering the cartoon-ish style of this site. I really like your sites in general DarthWang. I just think something's missing or out of place here.

 (3.00)

Doing something creative to what would otherwise be a direct rip of some video is always worth extra points to me.<br /><br />What's also worth extra points is having a gif without a watermark (there are plenty of free tools out there that won't generate one of these), and music that's appropriate.

 (0.00)

I suppose all I would have to do is post a picture of the Edmund Fitzgerald, along with the music, and then have Kramer pop up in the picture saying racist stuff and then Obama somewhere in there and then something about Belfour.

 (0.00)

i didn't find that passage, i wrote it. i figured it seemed like something weird moon man would come up with.<br /><br />do you have any idea why the voice is so much deeper when i uploaded it? it sounds normal on my comp. and thanks for the tips and welcoming.

 (2.00)

So basically, your defense is that in order for something to be racist, it has to be negative and/or hateful and/or ridiculing. Can't racism just result from plain ignorance? I do see what you mean about there being a difference between racism and racial stereotyping, but that doesn't change much for me. I don't find either to be very acceptable on its own.<br /><br />You have to make the very topic of racism the joke, not the actual content of racism. I thought your site about Asian baseball players was a fantastic demonstration of this. It played on a seemingly American stereotyping of Asians in such a way that the stereotyping perspective was the joke rather than Asians. In this site, I don't really see that.<br /><br />I think a better argument would be that you were contrasting the elements of the well-spoken, intellectual girl from Bill Nye with the crude stereotyping from long ago. Perhaps you could convince us that this was somehow satirical, that it actually had a point. Otherwise, it's just an out-of-the-way punchline that can only be funny because of just how out of the way it is. I suppose that's fine, but I'm sure there's plenty of other options you could have taken to get that effect.

 (5.00)

I was [u]totally[/u] planning on doing something just like this. Yours has more finesse than mine would've had, though (especially since you already have experience with making these slatted images).<br /><br />Great site!

 (5.00)

ooo, also, my friend and i just discovered a boom mic reflection on some shiny surface on the bridge. first time i've ever noticed that in tng, i think... i forget the name of the episode, but it was a Beverley Crusher centric episode, the one where members of the ship/crew kept disappearing along with all traces of their existence, and Crusher would be the only person who recalled anything about them. eventually she was the only person left on the ship as it was self destructing or on some collision course with an energetic anomaly or something typical like that. as it turns out, she was actually displaced in some alternate universe bubble created by her twink son Wesley Crusher created in an experiment we saw take place earlier in the episode. Geordi La Forge let Wesley do the shit. yet another Geordi screw up, like telling the ship's computer to create a holodeck adversary capable of defeating Data in a game, which led to the ship's computer becoming self aware. dumbass.

 (5.00)

I seem to remember something about sandwich choices, and I know we had salad choices. We would have to take red laminated strips of paper if we wanted taco salad and green if we wanted chef salad. There was yellow too, but I can't remember what that was for (possibly PB&J). 3rd grade was definitely my favorite year (1997-98) and this site seemed to hit everything right on the money. Everyone was drawing the S that year and I hated it, until someone finally showed me how to draw it. I don't remember anything about the cube though. We also had "lunch tiles" with our names on them, which we placed under our desired lunch. And we also had all those stupid little tasks to do (moving the name tiles after lunch was one of them). I'm not exaggerating when I say that I was the smartest in my class that year. I would always compete with this other dude in everything and I usually came out on top (getting the most stars for completing the most math exercises, other shit). I was the overachiever back then. Then I got to middle school and said "Fuck this shit." <br /><br />tl;dr

 (0.00)

Umfold - thank you! I had NO idea that she was the little girl in Dune; I don't think I ever would have recognized her. Somebody should do something with that. Plus I been to Worcester.

 (1.00)

yeah, jesus man. fatty, you made a "stay in the kitchen" joke??? you seemingly were not even attempting to create what some pretentious college freshmans might call "meta irony" or something asstarded like that.<br /><br />and Ummy, you're praising someone for uploading the SIMPLEST of "original content" or whatever it was i think you thought you meant??? now THAT would be a funny joke, especially if we all bought it, which we did not. we didn't need to buy anything. we simply noted you reality.<br /><br />so HAHAHAHA, WITH THIS SITE, FATTY TRIED (IN THE SAME WAY) TO MAKE A PDE-LIKE VOICE JOKE AND YOU USED TWO DIFFERENT ACCOUNTS TO TELL US HE HAS POTENTIAL AND YOU "LOVE" SEEING THAT ON YTMND????? DO YOU REALIZE WHAT I JUST POINTED OUT????? DO YOU REALIZE WHAT YOU WERE SAYING???????<br /><br />[i]you're a hater[/i]

 (0.00)

I read it because you replied to my comment and it showed up in my profile. This place probably is run by alts, way too many right now. I guess I would no longer be surprised to find out that newer users (09ers, 10ers, 11ers) are actually long-standing 06ers, 07ers, and even some 08ers. I mean, even you are a fairly new user, who has made decent sites since day one, something that is a bit out of the ordinary for someone without experience of YTMNDing. Or maybe you've been making nice edits since before you had a place to display them. It's hard to know anymore. <br /><br />There has apparently been a group of users out to get me (and very likely, a few others) for years, using multiple alts that they pass around to each other. I've always known that one account in particular has been used by more than one person, but have always attributed it to its creator and ring leader because accusing someone else would not be right. I have to ask myself "What the fuck did I do to make so many people mad? Make bad sites?" For anyone reading this, because I know there are people who follow me around 24/7, I'm sorry I tainted your enjoyment of a website by being present. <br /><br />I'm not saying that you, Lastimero, are part of that group in some way or some other user posting sites with a different account out of the fear of knowing that the sites would be downvoted on his real account for past douchebaggery, but I wouldn't be surprised to find out that you are, since it has been happening a lot lately. I'll just say for the record that you make great sites. So if you happen to be someone like He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named, who gloats about his "best sites", then fine. You've proven that I vote based on the user's negative activity. Not like it ever needed to be proven, since I've openly commented with my vote on his above-average recently created shit. <br /><br />And if you are

 (5.00)

I was thinking this would have something to do with 4chan

 (0.00)

I agree. It would've been much better if it was a legitimate user posting a legitimate comment about my site legitimately having been done before. But I take what I can get.<br /><br />I chose the music because I wanted something with that [i]can-do spirit[/i] without being too over-the-top sappy and sunny (eg: The Polyphonic Spree), and Strawberry Swing builds up nicely with the storyline. (lol, storyline)

 (0.00)

Its the law of fads my friend, I rip off a funny site and people rate it half as funny as the original, you rip off my rip-off of a site while ripping off that retarded soundfuck fad at the same time and no one likes it.<br /><br />Go ahead bro, drop ten bucks on your site and see where it goes. Good Luck.<br /><br />Hey, you wanted to be funny, perhaps something less annoying in the sound and something more insightful in picture and you could have owned me but you did not. Try to keep in mind that all of My YTMNDs took a grand total of maybe 5 minutes to make combined. If I gave a shit and put out something original with time and effort It would probably do well, however I spend most of my time working, playing games, partying and fucking. Instead of sitting in front of photoshop for hours or paying for film to gif software to make a bunch of ADD sufferers laugh. But hey, when I've got 45 seconds to waste and nothing better to do, bam one YTMND.