YTMND Search

 (1.00)

you didn't make this

 (0.00)

I didn't make this, yo. But I hope that after you 1 my site for plagiarism you google disasterpeace and find his library of music. It's really good.

 (1.00)

Considering you didn't make either the sound or image, yet both have been posted before this honestly deserves a 1.

 (0.00)

BREAKING NEWS!!!! this just in, I didn't make the gif!!!! OH NOES THE INTERNET IS CRASHING!!!! RUN!!!!! oh wait.....all I know is if you didn't at least smile when you watched it then you've probably don't have anything to live for

 (5.00)

I hope you didn't have any officers work on this ytmnd. And also, for f*ck's sake make more sites.

 (2.00)

you didn't go and make a ytmnd account just to make THIS did you?

 (1.00)

Hmm, you didn't bother to crop out the HyperCam logo, or make any editing or effort whatsoever, and you didn't even use an actual picture from a satellite? This could be troll material.

 (0.00)

i hope you didn't sell your 4chan to make this site

 (5.00)

why didn't you make this?

 (0.00)

I have a feeling that you didn't make this.

 (0.00)

When the sponsors run out, I'll be sure to message you to re-sponsor it. And to re-sponsor it. And to re-sponsor it. And to re-sponsor it. We'll keep it going as long as we can remember to keep it going.<br /><br />P.S. I didn't make this site because you called me a nerd - I couldn't care less what anyone calls me, especially a "nerd". I made it out of the sheer coincidental shock that went through me when I put two and two together for the first time.

 (5.00)

does anyone else get prairiedogeric10 and Lacrossestar83 confused? I don't know why I associate you guys so much. Maybe because your names are really long and end in a number (but so does mine). And the fact that you guys added me on facebook within like 2 days of each other didn't help. Are you guys like best pals? Because in my mind that's how it is. There's some magical bond between you two that makes you inseparable. You guys both become prominent on ytmnd around the same time, about when I stopped doing a lot on the site. WHY IS THIS? WHY CAN'T I TELL YOU TWO APART? DO YOU GUYS MAKE SIMILAR SITES? IT SEEMS LIKE IT. BUT I'VE NEVER BOTHERED TO GO COMPARE. So I have no idea. I'll continue to assume you guys are the same person.

 (5.00)

...thank god you didn't touch QOTSA...I still have to make my raymond site with their cover of the Kinks. What song is this anyways?

 (5.00)

This is fantastic even if you didn't make the gif.

 (3.00)

I think what coconut's TRYIN TO SAY....IS THAT.... http://imgur.com/m9rLj This image was submitted to imgur a day ago and viewed about 320,000 times by people across the internet. In other words, you didn't make this. <br /><br />THAT'S JUST BULLSHIT. THAT'S BULLSHIT!

 (0.00)

First of all, Darth Wang didn't invent the concept of making sites that are "so bad they're good", he's just the most prolific out of the few people who adhere to this idea. Second, its very much possible to make the category of sites I'm talking about without doing the old darthwang formula of "insert khan/vader/chadwarden into another thing". You just have to think outside the box in order to make something funny instead of repeating concepts that have been beaten to death.<br /><br />Anyway, that's what I want to see out of people who obviously like fpa stuff. I've seen your other stuff and honestly, its pretty bad and not in a good way which is why i'm trying to help you out right now. You can keep making these sites to your hearts delight but don't expect a positive reaction both from the community at large and from the remnants of the fpa.

 (0.00)

Sorry, not every site can be a Superfriends epic find. Some microbrewery in my state made this, and I had a chuckle. I thought I'd share. Your 5 vote means as little as your 1 vote would have, since I didn't make this site to be some monster smash hit for everyone to upvote. For such jokes the ranking means nothing to me. So fake away all you want. Sometimes telling the joke, regardless of receptions, is the point.

 (1.00)

hey lickit, say whatever you want about me, but leave LSD out of this. as far as philosophical shortcuts go, it deserves your respect. <br /><br />"i'm proud of the site and even prouder of the low effort that went into actually making it." you may not recall, but i've said before: your comments on other people's sites often point out their structural elements and deride their use of formula. i did the same, and you call it mocking and mean-spirited. and if you haven't made all your mean-spirited and mocking comments in one place, it's only because you spread them out. oh well, so it goes. <br /><br />i really believe that i like you and your sites more than you do. you are one of a handful of users that make this place worth visiting. sorry if you're so insecure that you find my ramblings to be "intellectual" and think they need to be knocked down a peg or two. (i only made the comment about your literacy bc usually you respond with "didn't read") stop confusing your sense of subtlety with cynicism and sarcasm, and you'll be fine.<br /><br />and do i contradict myself? then i contradict myself. ... i contain multitewds. so suck my contradictions, and take it if you're going to dish it out.<br /><br />u mad? nah, we cool.

 (5.00)

who are you sharing this account with? I know you didn't make this, lax. but I could be wrong.

 (0.00)

you probably wouldn't have this much "trolling" going on if you didn't help instigate it by responding to all of it<br /><br />and you sure as hell respond to EVERY fucking comment about you<br /><br />and you didn't answer the other questions I had, which i'm not surprised by, you are very selective on what to answer, making sure you can respond to something without saying anything self-insulting in the process<br /><br />you are quite the coward

 (1.00)

nice use of text, dipshit.<br /><br />oh wait, you didn't make this.<br /><br />oh wait, i mean shitball, or [i]like[/i] a shitball.

 (2.00)

Here's my feedback.<br /><br />Your site is basically a looped YouTube video with different audio, right? You didn't make the video, and you didn't make the audio. I'm cool with that as long as you can make something new with it. For me, this isn't much different than the original video. Yeah, the audio is [i]technically[/i] different, but it doesn't really change the concept. It's still a time-lapse of Noah aging. So this rates about a 2 for me. If you are interested in how I generally vote on sites, have a look at the comment section for [u]rip-nujabes.ytmnd.com[/u].<br /><br />I'm not really a good representative of the average YTMND voter, though, so I'll try to address what others might think of this site. Some will automatically downvote this because the Noah thing is old and we've seen it all before. Some will automatically upvote this because the audio and image make sense together. Some will automatically downvote this because it's not funny to them. Some will automatically upvote this simply because of They Might Be Giants. Some will automatically downvote this because it's "stolen."<br /><br />I'd like to also point out that a site like this would probably have done pretty well back in 2006/2007, what many consider to be the "Glory Days of YTMND." There were a lot of users who were more than happy to give 5's to anything that was halfway entertaining. Not to mention that there was far more traffic back then, meaning that rather than getting a measly 3 votes and 105 views, you'd probably have at least 20 votes and 1,000 views. Times have changed, and this place has become a bit more barren. It's much harder now to have a successful site than it used to be, in my opinion (others would disagree with me on that, though).<br /><br />Anyway, sorry to go on for so long; I get long-winded sometimes. If you ever want more feedback or

 (5.00)

oooooo, this former-featured-user gave you a minus one star[/i] because you didn't take a few extra minutes to capture the image properly.<br /><br />AH HAHAHHAAHAHAHAHAHAAA<br /><br />i am literally famous for []iMY[/i] own attention to detail. people litterally comment on that about me in my in my famous gifs i make for max.<br /><br />NOT YOU.<br /><br />[i]YOU DO NOT PAY ATTENTION TO DETAILS[/ii]

 (4.00)

Umfuld, forget whatever problem you have with me for a moment and consider my idea:<br /><br />I seriously think this site could be a lot funnier if it showed the "It's a Wonderful Life" daughter when she says her line here. Picture it, a cute little cheerful girl in 1946 attire and a gray-scale color scheme. She looks so innocent. Then it switches to Deniro with a harsh "FUCK YOU."<br /><br />That's funny, because it shows [i]contrast[/i]. You started to show some of that contrast already, but I think it could be pushed further. <br /><br />Since you didn't edit the girl's voice so it sounds like she's on the phone, it would make more sense auditorily this way, too.

 (5.00)

the pixels you didn't clean up almost make this look 3d

 (0.00)

This is why you didn't get that counseling job you applied for in 1984 - not because of your short-lived history as an adjunct instructor which lasted three weeks until you demonstrated how to check for lumps on a female student in the HPER 100 class you were teaching. After a practice session with a C average student who had questions about what he should do with his future, you were told to reconsider your direction in life with a visit to the local psychiatrist. You were then told to try stand up, but that idea came crashing down when the club threw you out after making fun of the Downs kid in the first row. And here you are now, on the Internet for five years, showing off your "talents" to a virtual world who really couldn't give a shit.

 (1.00)

you didn't make this gif.

 (1.00)

Tubez = you didn't make this.

 (1.00)

Television = you didn't make this.

 (1.00)

Adam Corolla = you didn't make this.