YTMND Search

 (5.00)

I five'd it

 (5.00)

I havent seen it, is it good?

 (5.00)

i hope its solar powered

 (0.00)

SandalSmith? Hoo boy. His whole idea of content here are self-inserts. He seems to hold a vendetta against me because I've constantly talked smack about his YTMNDs. Now he downvotes mine every time they come up. I flew way, way off the handle and pulled a SqrlyJack (don't ask) to try and insult him. So basically it's a rivalry thing, because we're both too stubborn and butthurt at each other to quit. At least he barely uses YTMND, unlike Derpy.

 (1.00)

Well done. Now you get it.

 (5.00)

I don't want to know how long it took you to make this holy shit

 (5.00)

After getting ousted by Happy, Ronald decided to dial up the creepy to compete with The Burger King and thus, perhaps get his job back

 (0.00)

Crypto will be the future, buy XRP while it's still cheap. Trust me.

 (0.00)

he's been pretty dedicated to his privacy, aside from a few pictures with twitter users here and there, and I think after making those, what, 4 videos or so? He probably got tired of playing the character, or it ran it's course, but for all of us it never ran it's course. His character was a masterpiece in trolling and humor. I wish he'd embrace it more aside from his one quickly posted and deleted 4chan post.

 (5.00)

Thankful ytmnd was at its height in the stone age or I'd be out of a job.

 (0.00)

I mean . . . . It is a natural fit . . .

 (5.00)

As for people I have also downvoted on the regular? I can also offer my feelings there too.<br /><br />Pichuz / DerpySillyAccidentPR is definitely high on my list. Their sites come off as the mad ramblings of the mentally ill. The sites themselves are a bunch of text-to-speech leftist word salads, and the fact they're all handled as one big run-on sentence doesn't help. I also am not fond of the AI art they constantly spit out for their inane ramblings, either. Let alone they constantly delete their sites too, and spit out the same stuff constantly as well.<br /><br />SandalSmith? Hoo boy. His whole idea of content here are self-inserts. He seems to hold a vendetta against me because I've constantly talked smack about his YTMNDs. Now he downvotes mine every time they come up. I flew way, way off the handle and pulled a SqrlyJack (don't ask) to try and insult him. So basically it's a rivalry thing, because we're both too stubborn and butthurt at each other to quit. At least he barely uses YTMND, unlike Derpy.<br /><br />I will admit that there's definitely elitism going on. At least, I can admit to being guilty of it myself. Once again, I'm sorry for being a jerk, and want to do better going forward. If I felt anyone else was going to give you any insight or feedback, I wouldn't be going to all this effort to yap all of this on a dead proto-meme site. I don't always agree with you on stuff, Skanda, but I can appreciate when we do share similar interests and views.<br /><br />You're alright, dude.

 (5.00)

Well, this certainly got me to think when I saw it. Strap in, I guess I've got a word salad for you. Not trying to be mean with this one, but I'd like to offer my thoughts on your plight.<br /><br />By definition, I would say all your sites are classic YTMNDs. Picture, sound, text, and a singular focus. They don't use any of the classic fads / memes but honestly, they don't need to. For most of my own YTMNDs, I try to aim for some funny or unique concept, or a direct pop culture quote or scene. Not every site I've uploaded has been well-received either.<br /><br />If I had to guess about the downvotes? My best guess for others, as well as my personal feelings, are about overexposure. I'm again not trying to be mean, but I feel a lot of your YTMNDs are very samey. Usually they're about various female characters in media, or various e-girls, or they're political in nature. But it feels like you've got a "shotgun" approach, throwing a bunch of these very similar sites out at once constantly to see what sticks. <br /><br />I can't speak for everyone else here, but I can at least explain my own displeasure. It sadly doesn't help that people don't seem to offer any real feedback. It's something that irks me about comments across the internet in general. To be fair, a lot of my "constructive criticism" on YTMND is mostly snark and slurs that I qualify for myself.<br /><br />I know I've gotten annoyed by this approach plenty of times. I don't want to make a big deal about it. I'm kind of a zealot and get assmad over the stupidest things. I would like to try and be fair, and give higher ratings on sites of yours that I do like. And even for everyone else's YTMNDs? Hey, they can't all be winners. OfficialUnofficial is also guilty of having samey content.<br /><br />I can't really help you here, but I can at least express my own feelings. I'm sorry for being a jerk, and want to be more fair and supporting for your stuff here.

 (5.00)

It's not dead, it's resting!

 (0.00)

Not upset with a 3, more so of the comment, this website is based off of making crude and simple things, I wanted to make this because I was making something else, but stumbled upon this, and I liked the idea of it sounding like a record skipping. But that's about as far as the idea went. And so, I focused on that. Sometimes I like making things that are very basic one idea things. Not everything has to be high art or even middle art. So I totally get the 3, I just get flustered by people expecting more from me when sometimes I want to make something that requires no thought. Plus I've been working on a big reference site again, and so when I'm working on that, making something simple reminds me of why I'm making things in the first place, to have fun. Aaaaaaaanyways, I've rambled a bit. It's all good.

 (5.00)

this is such an amazing masterpiece, but its 2025 and not 2006 so practically nobody will see it

 (5.00)

Its one vote. Calm down.

 (4.00)

I stand corrected, context is everything and this explains it all<br /><br />https://heytmndude.ytmnd.com/

 (5.00)

This is the faggiest of faggy short films<br /><br />I love it

 (5.00)

It's a man on a pig.

 (5.00)

The cold open involves Danny and Ted coming into Mr. Ernst’s office for a meeting, which, after a bit of banter regarding his previous (horrible) advertising idea, he finally gets to the purpose of:<br /><br />Ted says it’s a man on a pig, but Mr. Ernst, upset, insists it’s a horse. His plan is to create an ad in the desert for the ranch, inspired by desert drawings in Peru that people fly in from all over the world to see, viewable from the air. He also blatantly talks about bribing the pilots to call the passengers’ attention to the ad.<br /><br />Danny, probably in jest, suggests making it big enough to see from the space shuttle, and Ted can’t take it anymore:<br /><br />Mr. Ernst, however, seriously considers it. He even recruits Danny to work together with him on it. Danny isn’t pleased, and Ted feigns disappointment. Mr. Ernst says they’ll get started right after breakfast.

 (5.00)

I like the concept, I like you and I like your sites. But I just need to see a little more than a post of a clip if its going to be on up and coming.

 (0.00)

Also it is suppose to be absurd... ever heard of goatse.cx

 (5.00)

found it: /watch?v=dLykknlM7Ls

 (0.00)

Okee I change it

 (5.00)

Do I even wanna know what the donut's for?<br /><br />...is it for one's own donut? ._.

 (5.00)

Also btw, just linked Whang the Chadstreet Boys site, he saw it & laughed!

 (5.00)

well it is called YTMND Fad Legends #1, so here's hoping he's covering all the big fads.

 (5.00)

yeah, and it's surreal to see my ytmnd username briefly in a youtube video. O_O

 (5.00)

Aw sheet, I was hoping Whang would cover more YTMND and not his usual grossout shock humor shit. Excellent that it's even the Gay Fuel fad!<br /><br />Anyway #DarthWangIsOverParty