Incredible Exploits of Nothing
Created on: July 30th, 2006
Incredible Exploits of Nothing
http://drdino.activeforjesus.com/videos/seminar1_300k.wmv http://proveevolution.ytmnd.com

Sponsorships:

Vote metrics:

rating total votes favorites comments
(2.81) 1,561 129 1,446

View metrics:

today yesterday this week this month all time
0 0 0 0 42,106

Inbound links:

views url
77 http://www.stumbleupon.com/su/
56 https://www.bing.com
31 http://everythingiswrong.wetpaint.com/thread/3759618/GOD%3F?offset=20
11 http://ytmnsfw.com/sites/sponsored/alltime
8 https://www.google.co.uk/

Add a comment

Please login or register to comment.
<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 >>
July 30th, 2006
(0)
One because of horrible innacuracy. You suggest atoms formed of their own will from nothing and propogated like an embryo. The proper explanation would involve the big bang by your story.
March 1st, 2009
(0)
Sh*t's complex. I don't understand it. Therefore snide *ss YTMND based off poor logic and lack of scientific background. Brought to you by Focus on the Family, since Evolution destroys our literal interpretation of one out of thousands of holy texts that have existed!
May 18th, 2010
(2)
SKY WIZARDS GRANT WISHES
July 30th, 2006
(0)
[ comment (and 1 replies) is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
everybody knows it was the FSM
July 30th, 2006
(0)
/agree with storms
July 31st, 2006
(0)
Reminds me of Douglas Adams.
(1)
NOT EVEN INTELLIGENT DESIGN CAN SAVE YOU FROM ME.
May 18th, 2010
(0)
I support Diablo references.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
agreed: the beginning is inaccurate, i'm not sure what that is referring to, to be honest, regardless, the point is made well
July 31st, 2006
(0)
July 31st, 2006
(0)
Meh, might as well five it for being unique.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
This site needs more Jesus.
(2)
Wow, i guess now i guess i worship something when i say i worship nothing, but if i worship nothing how can i be worshiping something?
July 31st, 2006
(1)
Lol, if only.... f*cking Christians.
July 31st, 2006
(1)
THIS IS WHAT SCIENTOLIGSTS REALLY BELIEVE. jk, 5.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
You should have saved your $7.47 you spent to sponosor this. Go preach on a street corner where you can reach a lot more people who don't want to hear it.
July 31st, 2006
(3)
+2 for funky music -10 for religious rambling
July 31st, 2006
(2)
Horrible inaccuracy and great omissions. You didn't use your brain even a bit. For example, you excluded the possibilty of different life forms with different natural 'constants'. You also exclude the possibilty of more than one sources of creation. Or even the possibility that is 'intelligent' as WE know it. Very very narrow minded half-assed presentation of some half-assed philosophical discussions. You TRULY fail.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
^^ the possibility that the source of all creation is 'intelligent' or aware of us as we know it*
July 31st, 2006
(0)
And btw, most importantly, you didn't show any proof of existence (I mean ACTUAL PHYSICAL PROOF) for your intelligent designer (IF we assume 'he' is only '1' and exclude ALL other uninvestigated and as gibberish possibilities.)
July 31st, 2006
(2)
-4 for religious propaganda
July 31st, 2006
(1)
WOW! you're awful.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
=( you fail!
July 31st, 2006
(0)
Liked it, glad I can like something and not just be a mindless collection of atoms...
July 31st, 2006
(2)
Wheres your god now? 1'd!
July 31st, 2006
(0)
i'll give a 5, just by chance
July 31st, 2006
(0)
When you stop asking questions about the world around you, you stop finding answers. At least scientists dare to guess and work out the answers and make mistakes instead of remaining happy and ignorant. Were it not for science this message wouldn't be broadcast to millions of people around the world through fibre tubes via light (YES TUBES PEOPLE!).
July 31st, 2006
(1)
http://exploitsofgod.ytmnd.com/
July 31st, 2006
(0)
That's idiotic. Biggest waste of money ever. You see... I have this theory that science is devoted to the pursuit of knowledge, whereas religion is devoted to the rejection of knowledge- Rather than try to explain why and how things happen, the religious just pan everything they don't know off to some big invisible person floating in the sky. It makes no sense at all.
July 31st, 2006
(1)
I am highly amused at how offended everyone is.
July 31st, 2006
(1)
It really is hysterical how offended and preachy all these downvoters are. Notice the subtle irony here.
July 31st, 2006
(1)
Don't dumb everything down by saying that it happened "purely by chance". Evolution isn't "purely chance", dumbf*ck.
July 31st, 2006
(1)
sigh
July 31st, 2006
(1)
wtf is this relgious sh*t, gtfo outta my internets f*gggggggggggggggggg p.s. your gonna have to take gr.11 biology again with fuller, and he wets the bed
July 31st, 2006
(2)
So who designed your "perfect God"...an even more intelligent designer? 1 for pushing logical fallacies on YTMND.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
If intelligent life can only arise on planets that are suited for it, you might imagine that any life that does arise will always say "wow, isn't it amazing that everything works is suited so well for us to live here?" I like the music tho.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
5 for production value, -4 for knowing absolutely jack-sh*t about the big bang, accretion, abiogenesis, evolution, geology, and the fallacy of infinite regression. =D
July 31st, 2006
(0)
5forthe SOMETHING FROM NOTHING part. that's the real question. the question of luck is abstruse, irrelevant, and counter productive. to all the angry downvoters: are you sure that you don't worship the scientific method? that perhaps you are no less closed minded than religious fundamentalists? don't get me wrong, religious crusades on science anger me. but so does atheist bigotry in the name of science. no theory or data set can possibly explain how it's possible that anything exists in the first place.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
+5 for the music and for all of the hilarious reactions in the comments.
(0)
1 because while the random events that caused life are pretty hard to believe, so is the idea that an invisible sky man just existed and always existed and nobody created him, you creationist dumbass.
(0)
I'll 5 this, favourite it and donate to it if you answer this to my satisfaction: Why can "God" just exist without being created, but the universe can't just exist and had to be created?
July 31st, 2006
(0)
HOW DARE YOU PUT CHILD PORN ON YTMND!
July 31st, 2006
(0)
tightenupthegraphics, i don't think the ytmnd is saying necessarily that there is a god, it's simply being humorous about asking the questions, and perhaps suggesting that we have a little humility and imagine that maybe we all have no idea what we're talking about. and then laugh about it because we're hilarious morons.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
f*ck you, you christian piece of sh*t die in a fire and stop trying to shove your idiotic nonsense down everyone's throat
July 31st, 2006
(0)
1 for thinking that evolution involves some type of choice or decision and thus completely misunderstanding it.
July 31st, 2006
(1)
Although the ability for one to prove there is a God lies in everyting around this universe, people sometimes fail to realize that proving the existence of god does not constitute the exsistence of a christian god. Intellegent design, no matter who argues it, does not prove in anyway the validity of the bible. Its like proving ice cream is tasty, and proving that chocolate ice cream is the best, its two different arguments. Nice site though.
July 31st, 2006
(1)
^_^
July 31st, 2006
(1)
Lowlz at bitter atheists.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
-1 for not funny, -1 for religious BS, and -2 for sponsoring your own ytmnd.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
I think nearly all voters here 'down or up' have upper-average to high levels of IQ unlike the creator of this site. Now what we must realize is that there is still no SOLID PHYSICAL EVIDENCE or PROOF to DESCRIBE the source of all existence and first amounts of energy in the universe (nobody knows it's name, it's rules, descisions, likes and dislikes or whether it's more than '1' entity.) So stop all this religious non-sense.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
Also, [that source of creation] may not be intelligent in the sense we know it. And besides WHO THE HELL can ever prove that with different natural constant there would be no universe or life in the universe? I'd say there would be, but completely DIFFERENT with different living beings and natural laws! I challenge you to prove me wrong! >:)
July 31st, 2006
(0)
www.divinecosmos.com
July 31st, 2006
(0)
TightenUpTheGraphics "Why can "God" just exist without being created, but the universe can't just exist and had to be created?" Because the Universe is not God. Because God is God then God would have the attributes of being God. One of those attributes is being eternal and also being the creator of all things, including time itself, putting God outside the dimension of time altogether. Why should matter exist?
July 31st, 2006
(0)
Why should the dimension of time exist? Only explanation is that something with eternal attributes had to create it, something that isn't bound by time itself, God. Same thing goes for matter. Matter cannon not be creater nor destroyed right? If this is true then there is nothing in this universe that can create more matter, which means something that is not made of matter had to make matter.
May 7th, 2008
(0)
or maybe the whole universe we live in is just a molecule in a donut that is beeing eaten atm by homer simpson! that makes the donut factory god, and hes purpose was just to satisfy homer :(
July 31st, 2006
(0)
Also, dont give the universe is eternal and so is matter argument cuz if the universe is eternal then now could never happen. That would mean that there would be an infinite amount of time before now, making now, impossible to happen, but it is happening, right now. The only explanation is that time is not eternal and that it was created. But even if it was eternal, still don't explain why matter and time exist.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
-100,005 for lack of science, +100,005 for taking a risk. -4 for risking turning ytmnd.com in to a religious debating ground. There's to much of that on the internets already. Science FTW, wishful thinking FTL.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
wow now that turned everyones belief because it goes into such detail and fact. Not.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
uh, are you serious? birds decided to turn into animals? unreal
July 31st, 2006
(0)
Th greates part about this is that people have alot to say. You (the offended) have to realize what his literal aim was. On a backdrop, I find it hilarious you found the need to counter your thoughts. Keep it coming, this is how our Super-powers keep dignity at bay.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
also god
July 31st, 2006
(0)
good stuff
July 31st, 2006
(0)
You crazy atheists and your idea on creation. God bless yeh' all. CHRISTIANS LOL
July 31st, 2006
(0)
Mehm.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
Keep your damned ideas to yourself and off of YTMND, you should've known you were going to get downvoted to hell by hordes of Christians. Oh and BTW your theory is bullocks. Something can't happen from nothing.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
you've been spending too much time with Raptor Jesus. your logic sucks and your comprehension of evolution is a mere Operating Thetan Level 0.1. also, moron.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
this ytmnd seems to be more parodious than some might have originally thought. Otherwise, it would have been a big crock of pseudointellectual tripe. lets hope not.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
You obviously missed my point, if God is God, then He has the attributes of God, unlike anything in the universe which means that God is eternal and outside the dimensions of time, and space. Since God is not bound by any specific dimension we can say that the physical science of this universe is not bound to Him...
July 31st, 2006
(0)
dewarmysniper: this isn't my view of evolution/creationism
(0)
"if God is God, then He has the attributes of God, unlike anything in the universe which means that God is eternal and outside the dimensions of time, and space." What? The god knows where it is because it knows where it isn't....
July 31st, 2006
(0)
Jesus thinks the internetz are the debil!
July 31st, 2006
(0)
"What? The god knows where it is because it knows where it isn't...." OK, is that an argument? cuz if so it has no relevance to anything were talking about
July 31st, 2006
(0)
What's your point?
July 31st, 2006
(0)
"in the biggining there was nothing" EXCEPT. my friend: CHUCK NORRIS.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
Awesome. These guys are the most close minded people I have ever met. My priest knew the man's son who created the Big Bang Theory, and he said that his father believed in God. God does not prove himself to keep arrogant *ssholes who don't have faith out of heaven. You can not prove religon, the whole point of religon is faith.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
Trying to discredit a theory of the formation of the world based on chance? Not the best argument. Last I checked the Universe was pretty damn big, and has existed for a long -ass time. Odds are not a factor.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
HORRIBLY innacurate. In actuality, looking at things through such a childish lens garauntees poor understanding of the actual principles at work. Nothing 'just happens', everything is the sum of what proceded it. Also, 'time is simply an observation of energy being expressed. Therefore time exists because of the properties of energy. Also, the universe is eternal arguement is not invalidated by your silly 'infinite time' arguement, because a state of action (present) is necessary for energy expression.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
Also, if you believe god exists outside of existence, then you just admitted you think god doesn't exist. Existence = within the scope of things that can exist due to the natural laws of the universe. If it's not within those boundaries, it doesn't exist. Pretty black and white.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
"If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them." Leviticus 20:13 It's cool that God made the universe and all, too bad he REALLY hates gays.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
Ok, I like your argument against TightenUp's comment, however, by putting god outside the realm of our exsistence seems to put him into a dietist's conception of god. If I'm not mistaken, your argument entails that God created matter, but the rules of matter do not apply to him because he is not of matter. It, and correct me if I'm wrong, puts two completely different dimensions upon the universe, a dimension that I don't feel fits the biblical description of God at all.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
That is not how ANYTHING works or was made
May 14th, 2007
(0)
but its still funny
July 31st, 2006
(0)
Original and thought-provoking.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
Drusamson. Let me give you an example. The word "the". It exists inside the english language, but it doesn't exist in sign language. IF your deaf, and sign language is all you know, then does that mean the word the, in the english language doens't exist since you have no experince or knowledge of it? Elaborate on the not fitting hte biblical description of God at all. I think this fits the description perfectly. "I am the alpha and the omega, the beginning and end."
July 31st, 2006
(0)
Damn kid, look up super string theory and energy matter conversions. There you will find a working explanation of the universe that goes as far back as before the "nothing" and explains how matter can be created
July 31st, 2006
(0)
there is proof, God proves Himself to you as you seek Him. That's why it is a faith thing because you have to trust that God will reveal Himself to you. When I first started believing in God I had my doubts just like you but I wanted to know the truth. You can never understand it until God individually speaks to you. Aside from that however, i've seen way to many things for me to NOT believe in God.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
"The word "the". It exists inside the english language, but---" Language's existence is conceptual. As is god's. It is not my way to preach, however you lack a fundamental understanding of the universe. Simply put- Ideas/concepts can exist without mutual knowledge between peers, but this is in no way physical existence. The human imagination is not limited by the rules of existence, only by the structure of the mind. Concepts don't follow the rules of physical existence.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
5 for reminding me of that one time i became one with god thru lsd :D
July 31st, 2006
(0)
ok before i said i 5d it for the something from nothing idea. what i should have said was the something INSTEAD of nothing idea, which i found implicit in the ending when it says 'they went on trying to discover how no one got a hold of nothing and made everything'. i 5d it because that statement is humanity in a funny nutshell.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
Basically, by comparing god to the english word 'the', you state that god is a concept, and therefore does not exist in the scope of the physical universe. And if he doesn't, then he doesn't exist as an entity that can have any effect on the universe except through beings that act on that idea. And that's where you get religion. A bunch of people following an idea that someone made up a long time ago :)
July 31st, 2006
(0)
Even if there is only one possible unified theory, it is just a set of rules and equations. What is it that breathes fire into the equations and makes a universe for them to describe? The usual approach of science of constructing a mathematical model cannot answer the questions of why there should be a universe for the model to describe. Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?
July 31st, 2006
(0)
^stephen hawking quote^
July 31st, 2006
(0)
TheMadMonkey: I could go aheead and refute your argument but instead ill just say this. Your intelligence blocks out your basic common sense.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
I agree with the statement: everything is a product of what preceeded it. Believing that we were just "created" is like believing your new car just appeared at the lot. In actuality, it was built in a factory using metals, rubbers, and other things. Where did these metals come from? They were forged from ore. Where did this ore come from? It was dug up from the crust of our planet... you see where I'm going here, everything has a source. We have simply not discovered our source... In reality, I don't think
July 31st, 2006
(0)
we ever will. Once we do, we'll have the answers to all our questions. The laws of matter apply to us just as much as they do to said car... we're not above it in any way... we have to come from somewhere, we were not just created.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
Peterguy, God 'spoke' to you when you were looking for answers? If I were you I would get my self checked for paranoid schizophrenia!
July 31st, 2006
(0)
Well, everyone's entitled to their opinion, and I don't hold grudges. We all invariably think what we think because of what we have seen, and how we have seen it. What exactly do you mean by my common sense, though? That I don't trust my instincts? Well, if that is the case then yes, I don't trust them, because they are a survival tool, great for when you lack knowledge, but not effective when you have it.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
First off, the not knowing something exists but it still does argument can work for anything, including what your disspelling here. See how many people are bringing up Super String Theory and things of the like? To them you are deaf, and lacking knowledge of the word "the". However, the two levels of existence you put forth in your argument go against the biblical explanation because, if I am understanding you correctly, you are saying that matter and God are two different things.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
If you put that barrier between them, then it makes no sense that God, who is not bound by the same laws of matter, can appear as matter itself in the books of Genesis, Ezekiel, Exodus, so on and so forth. I leave Jesus out of that mix purposely because he was bound by the laws of matter. If I am completely misunderstanding you, please clarify sir.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
And also, these arguments are unnecessary. The problem is, you talk about your 'god' without bringing us any description. That's like me saying 'Oh I know a meteor hit the earth a 1000 years ago' without bringing any sort of date/proof/evidence. No one can prove me wrong but I can't prove myself right! That's when you know I'm talking out of my -ass! If you want people to accept your argument of god existing, bring us some ACTUAL PHYSICAL OBSERVABLE evidence (the ones that made YOU a believer!)
July 31st, 2006
(0)
Otherwise, check to see if your logic is still in place! We can't prove god not existing, but we can't prove him existing without ACTUALY PHYSICAL EVIDENCE!
July 31st, 2006
(0)
Drusamson: God is spiritual and physical and beyond description, so yes God is not matter. He can take the form of matter if He chooses but He is not actual matter. That is my belief.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
well u wont believe me because u think im crazy but the "physical" evidence i have seen is from healings through prayer as well as other things. I can't bring this to you, I can only tell you. My grandmother was deaf in her ear for almost 5 years and she would wake up to this annoying buzzing sound, after me and a bunch of ppl prayed over her, she can hear perfectly and no buzzing sound
July 31st, 2006
(0)
1'd for creationism. Let me explain the real story...
July 31st, 2006
(0)
my friend anthony who was crippled and could barely walk after being prayd for was literally doing laps around the dormatory. One girl her leg was shorter then the other (it was born that way) her leg literally grea 2/3inches during prayer, now she can walk fine
July 31st, 2006
(0)
Due to the fact that there are an infinite number of parellel universe, the reason our universe developed the way it did out of pure chance. In other universes, the conditions would be unfit for intelligent life to develop.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
"Due to the fact that there are an infinite number of parellel universe, the reason our universe developed the way it did out of pure chance. In other universes, the conditions would be unfit for intelligent life to develop." not the argument, the argument is y the heck does anything exist at all, period.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
I respect your evidence, however I'm curious how you feel about eastern healers who do the same things holding their spiritual beliefs, or Muslims who hold miracles of the Lord in their understanding of the Koran?
July 31st, 2006
(0)
Peterguy, if her leg actually grew, that's documentable physical evidence. I don't honestly believe you, but -if- it happened, you could get photographs and medical study. Her problem should have been documented by a doctor somewhere.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
Our universe began with the Big Bang 14 billion years ago. Life began on Earth about one billion years ago with when the high voltage of lightning striking carbon, methane, ammonia, etc. combined into a complex self replicating RNA molecule.
(0)
Hey Peterguy, do you believe in Santa Claus too? Blind faith is for idiots.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
FSM will eat your terdz. N E TERDZ?
July 31st, 2006
(0)
other evidences include the sudden ability to speak in other earhtly languages. (careful im not talking baout the nonsense tongues ppl talk about) im takling about someone is suddenly able to speak in another earthly language they dont know, for example a hispanic suddenly knowing chinese even though they never studied or know anything about the chinese language. And the things they said in the language, after being translated were things that referred to God being given glory in various ways.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
It’s funny when someone puts forth a different theory than evolution, it causes so much hate. Those who are the most insecure in their beliefs always scream the loudest.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
"not the argument, the argument is y the heck does anything exist at all, period." Stuff exists for no reason period, we're all really just coincidences caused by low entropy complex systems. Continuing...
July 31st, 2006
(0)
Well, it had to happen somewhere.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
RNA eventually developed into DNA, which formed the basis of cells. These cells bunched together to form the first multicellular organisms, phyla porifera (sponges).
July 31st, 2006
(0)
Peterguy, these are not 'evidences' to me. These are just crap that you're typing on the internet. WHERE IS THE DOCUMENTED PROOF? Where's at least a god damned picture? I'll even accept photoshopped ones =D.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
That's not evidence because you can't prove that God made them speak in a language they don't supposedly know.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
Oh yeah, and I spoke to Satan yesterday and he gave me the ability to shoot lazer beams out of my -ass. OMG ITS RLY TRU LOL!
July 31st, 2006
(0)
i dont have any "pictures" if u want proof go to a church that knows what there talking about and is heavily into the healing part of the gospel
July 31st, 2006
(0)
July 31st, 2006
(0)
Phyla porifera evolved into cnidarians (jellyfish), then platyhelmintes (flatworms), nematoda (roundworms), annelida (earthworms), mulluska (squids and snails), arthropoda (bugs), then finally the advanced deuterostomes echinadermata (starfish) and verbrata (mammals, birds, fish, etc.).
July 31st, 2006
(0)
Hahahha, you've been watching CTS too much. Snap out of it, it's TV damn it =D. And the rest is just a bunch of tricks! Seriously dude, snap out of it!
July 31st, 2006
(0)
"i dont have any "pictures" if u want proof go to a church that knows what there talking about and is heavily into the healing part of the gospel" Scientology can tell me the same things, that doesn't make it true.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
I like this one. Even though christianity sucks.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
"Phyla porifera evolved into cnidarians (jellyfish), then platyhelmintes (flatworms), nematoda (roundworms), annelida (earthworms), mulluska (squids and snails), arthropoda (bugs), then finally the advanced deuterostomes echinadermata (starfish) and verbrata (mammals, birds, fish, etc.)." ok thats great, that doesnt answer y anything exists
July 31st, 2006
(0)
LMAO, Motu, it's the same deal man. Marketing strategies!
July 31st, 2006
(0)
"Hahahha, you've been watching CTS too much." What is CTS? and believe me, im sane (even though u wont) "FSM will eat your terdz. N E TERDZ?" what is FSM?
July 31st, 2006
(0)
YOU think you're sane. I strongly urge you to get checked for either 'bring brainwashed' or having 'paranoid schizophrenia'. I'd go with the 1st one.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
Proto-humans evolved within phyla verbrata. Their opposable thumbs evolved from the claws of rodents allowed them to use tools. These tools allowed them to hunt for protein-rich meat. Thousands of years of carnivorous diets supplied the proto-humans with enough protein for large brains to develop. These proto-humans utilized their vocal chords to communicate.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
Mine is a very, very long story, so just wait.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
Don't trust your illusions. Check back and see what paved the way for these 'strong' beliefs. This time, be a bit more logical.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
"Don't trust your illusions. Check back and see what paved the way for these 'strong' beliefs. This time, be a bit more logical." Logic, things exist, something had to have made these things. Choices: God or Nothing. Nothing can't make anything so must be God.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
Spock will kill you
July 31st, 2006
(0)
40000 years ago, longer vocal chords alone allowed humans to dominate over the only other remaining proto-humans, the neandertals. Now free of competition, the humans were the top of the food chain. Humans eventually realized that plants grew in a regular cycle, and thus civilization and agriculture was born.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
But there was still some problems, because the humans now wanted to know where it all came from, and why they existed. A couple of guys thought that they could take advantage of this, and the first religion was born. These guys (now known as priests) told the people what they wanted to hear because they controlled the deities and therefore controlled the people.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
This worked for a few thousand years, until the Renniasance scholars realized that not everything could be solved with religion, so modern science was born.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
There is a 3rd option you have excluded, because you don't feel it is possible (as you stated above about infinite time preceeding the present). That is, that things exist in there present form as the sum of things that led to it. This is every bit as viable an option. Don't preculde it because you don't want to believe it, truth isn't about what you want.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
"The universe must have come from somewhere, so it must have been the intellence in the sky that grants healing powers to his followers!" This universe isn't all there is. There are ones above it. Matter was created here when 2 membrains collided in the 11th deminsion, further collisions resulted in gravity wells that helped from stars. Even more collisons have set the galaxies on so that they line up along planes.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
Science explained just about everything, and people began to realize that there was no room for deities. Advances in physical cosmology reveal that the universe exists for no reason in particular, and definitely not so we can serve gods, because gods are fiction.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
::sigh:: This has turned from intellegent back and forth to idiots raiding you for your beliefs. Such is life I suppose, so long as half you people who are attacking understand that Peterguy is way smarter than you.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
invaderchris: there are many different so called "religions" and perhaps some of them were spawned this way cuz they wanted to tell ppl what they wanted to hear but theres just 1 problem, what if thats not the case and what if it what they said wasnt cuz they were trying to control ppl but actually because they were following what God instructed
July 31st, 2006
(0)
God or nothing? Dude you are very narrow minded. There's INFINITE number of possibilities. Gods, Groups of gods, Alines from another dimension, an energy making machine, team of unintelligent designers etc. And they're ALL equally probably as a '1' god argument. They ALL lack evidence. Seriously, feed your curiosity. Don't just stab yourself in the eye and accept a theory others present.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
There are no souls, no afterlife; just particles and energy. The closest thing there is to an afterlife is the fact that the quarks that make up your atoms will never break down. We exist for no reason initially, it is our job to give ourself purpose, and not some fictional god.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
Madmonkey and invaderchris are excluded, and not what I meant by idiots raiding, btw, I meant the guy who mentioned spock, and things of the like.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
"::sigh:: This has turned from intellegent back and forth to idiots raiding you for your beliefs. Such is life I suppose, so long as half you people who are attacking understand that Peterguy is way smarter than you. " Thank you. I knew this was gonna happen before i posted this though cuz ppl r scared that when there beliefs are shaken so they fight back. I'm just fighting with common sense, lol.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
You seem to be really hellbent on the statement 'CHRISTIANITY IS THE TRUE ONE, I AM RIGHT, YOU ARE WRONG'. Geez, I've quit discussing this with you. Last comment.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
Atheist existentialism FTW
July 31st, 2006
(0)
"You seem to be really hellbent on the statement 'CHRISTIANITY IS THE TRUE ONE, I AM RIGHT, YOU ARE WRONG'." yup. and I have my reasons y i believe that
July 31st, 2006
(0)
1'd for Fish -> Birds with no trasitions of the amphibians or reptiles :( you phail at evolution.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
its been fun refuting arguments but now im gonna stop cuz i have other things i gotta do.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
No, you're just giving up because you know you're wrong. ;P
July 31st, 2006
(0)
no, im not giving up, i have to go to work stupid.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
One point I would like to make before you go. We have changed to meet complexity complexity has not changed to meet us. We are composed of many of the things that are abundant in this planet notice we do not tolerate rare surface chemicals well, such as lead and plutonium, but other chemicals such as oxygen and carbon we thrive on. If you wish to expand your mind and perhaps the way you think of the way to see the world around you read "A SHORT HISTORY OF NEARLY EVERYTHING"
July 31st, 2006
(0)
+1 for the music though
July 31st, 2006
(0)
The music is pretty good though ^_^
(0)
yay!
July 31st, 2006
(0)
Arrogant scum. I'm through here too, you still haven't said anything about scientific explanations of why the Big Bang occured. Attack anyone and they will fight back. Claim your side to be in the light and all others are in shadow, and I don't argue with people that "know" they are right
(0)
Wow, how did I miss this comment thread? Not that I have anything to contribute. Well, except that the "fish" slide looks suspiciously like a dolphin, which isn't a fish at all! Oh, and that devolution should be taught in schools http://mothersbaugh.ytmnd.com/
July 31st, 2006
(0)
Too bad that every invented version of God is an *sshole, aye?
July 31st, 2006
(0)
http://unfunnycreationists.ytmnd.com/
July 31st, 2006
(0)
5ed for truth.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
The big bang occurred because quantum uncertainty dictates that it will happen eventually.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
I don't believe in this, but that doesn't mean I'm gonna downvote it. (3'd for lack of anything special, though)
July 31st, 2006
(0)
"what if thats not the case and what if it what they said wasnt cuz they were trying to control ppl but actually because they were following what God instructed" Socialism 101: anything that can exploit you almost certainly is exploiting you; no exceptions, not even religion.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
If you want to believe in Intelligent Design/Creationism, that’s fine. Everyone should be allowed to believe what they want, especially over issues as significant as the origin of everything. I will not question your beliefs. But when arrogant, preachy, holier-than-thou *ssholes like you decide to mock the beliefs of others (in this case, scientific theories on the origin of the Universe), you offend and disrespect many people. Including myself. So please, get of my internet, f*cktard.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
Seriously, go f*ck yourself.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
waste of a perfectly good nedm opp.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
cool
July 31st, 2006
(0)
I come to ytmnd.com for the theology! And porn! You should combine the two! And then die! Exclamation!
July 31st, 2006
(0)
not too bad.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
If the 'conditions were slightly different', lots of things would die, but the ones that lived would reproduce, and their children would inherit the traits that allowed them to live. If the conditions had started off differently, we would have ended up differently than we now are. The idea of a 'creator' has no valid basis. The logic behind it is rediculous. Schools should oppose ignorance. Dumbass.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
Drivel.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
"UGH, this is HORRIBLY innaccurate." - By idiots who feel the need to talk about stuff we know. Let him be innaccurate, I like the story. It sounds like something in a children's book. Lawl to the people who thinks he is preaching.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
^well said^
July 31st, 2006
(0)
July 31st, 2006
(0)
How about we're all right and we just go home and have apple pie? 2 because it's not a very good ytmnd in general, but +1 for making the atheists pisssed :D
July 31st, 2006
(0)
why does every1 here think they're smart, UR all dumb! lol @ mortals.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
Man, who would have guessed that all of these downvoting f*cks would give a damn about what DAVID LAWRENCE thinks about how the universe began. It's a fun, unique way of looking at life. I'll doubt that anybody took half of a second to even consider the implications of how Earth would have been had it been 100 miles closer to the Sun, or 100 miles wider, or whatever. Upvoted, or something.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
LoL, overreactions.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
birds are animals
July 31st, 2006
(0)
*****
(0)
LOOK AT ALL U TALKING MONKEYS FIGHT, WOW I'M SORRY BUT YOUR 2000 YEAR OLD SCIENCE BOOK IS OUT OF DATE :)
(0)
Ghostown80 you’re an idiot. The Earth does not perfectly rotate around the Sun. We move Hundreds of miles toward as well as away from the Sun throughout our 365 day journey around it.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
get dissastified......?
July 31st, 2006
(0)
I think the laws of the universe clearly state that everything decays with time, not improves. Nothing can't become something by itself, silly! But alas, no one can deal with not being the master of his own universe, hence the theory of evolution.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
+5 because I hate christians
July 31st, 2006
(0)
OMFG look at all these comments. bunch or retards trying to argue about religion. who f*cking cares. just live, hurry up and die and pray that what happens next doesn't suck!
July 31st, 2006
(0)
+6 for Andy Hunter, +3 for intelligent design, -4 for taking way too long to get to the point, -2 for starting a flamewar :p
July 31st, 2006
(0)
god, people always get so up in arms whenever this kind of subject is raised. Just enjoy the YTMND. If this author wanted a real debate he/she would take it to a site not renowned for pointless amusement.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
You, sir, are retarded.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
actually what many percieve as mere coincidence could very well be simple relativity. Considering the universe can be taken as an entity in unto itself, the fractallized pieces which make it up are relative to eachother. Simple as 1+1=2.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
Fantastic. Don't listen to the downvoters. This ytmnd was entertaining, and that's good enough for anyone's five. ^_^ *hug*
July 31st, 2006
(0)
I could point out your religious ramblings, lack of looping, etc on why this is no good. But I'll simply say this. $7.47 and a religion to pimp will buy you a 1 star.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
If you're trying to make me belive in God, f*ck that and f*ck you.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
Not Even Jesus Music could save this. And thank you, but seeking truth from your kind of deity was what got me to break out of the illusion of blind faith in the first place. Besides, there's a mythos or two that would beg to disagree, both "living" and dead. Spontaneous generation as a theory died before the 1900's, by the by.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
bravo
July 31st, 2006
(0)
so i assume you aren't an atheist.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
July 31st, 2006
(0)
FACT: 30% of Atheists are lazy bastards. Of the 30%, more than two thirds are overweight.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
"Just by chance." Someone doesn't understand evolution.
July 31st, 2006
(0)
lol i love how the first comment is scientific... shadowmart-half and h whatever your name is... who gives a flying f*ck? anyway this was well made if you can wait through it all, though i saw spelling errors
July 31st, 2006
(0)
god rules
July 31st, 2006
(0)
Also, out of all the places to argue, people chose YTMND...A site devoted to Humorous Content where NOTHING should be taken seriously... Also, all our ramblings are to be wasted, Since we will never know the truth. Scinetists sure as hell won't figure it out in our lifetimes, So I would rather play it safe. It's only an hour every Sunday or Saturday...
July 31st, 2006
(0)
hmmmm 5'd for effort
July 31st, 2006
(0)
Well written and nice music. All in all a nice ytmnd no matter what the content.
August 1st, 2006
(0)
No matter how good of an argument you have for or against religion, the debate doesn't belong on YTMND.
August 1st, 2006
(0)
Troll of a YTMND
August 1st, 2006
(0)
If you're going to church every Sunday or Saturday, then you'd better go to mosque, budhist temple, church of scientology, Zoarostian temple... you know why jackass? THEY'RE ALL EQUALLY PROBABLE!
August 1st, 2006
(0)
sasuke, morons like you drive me up the nuts! Just do the humanity a favor and pull the trigger on yourself...
August 1st, 2006
(0)
lol at everyone debating the accuracy of a YTMND site! You guys are retards, I give a 5 just to piss you guys off (eventhough I don't really agree) :P This is a comedy site, please get a girlfriend and move out of yourl mommy's basement. Down with TYRANNY!
August 1st, 2006
(0)
http://godlikeproductions.com/bbs/message.php?messageid=191269&mpage=1&showdate=1/8/06
August 1st, 2006
(0)
TheDoz"""If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them." Leviticus 20:13 It's cool that God made the universe and all, too bad he REALLY hates gays." So is murder, judgement, stealing, impure thoughts, intent to do bad things, and condemnation. Read a book. Fundamentalists piss me off as much as ignorant *ssholes... eh, same difference.
August 1st, 2006
(0)
I'm sick of this discussion. Either way, 1'ing something just because you don't agree with it is immature. That reminds me, I saw Superman the other day and I totally give it one start because there is no f*cking way that sh*t happened in real life. Idiots. Go burn a cat.
August 1st, 2006
(0)
P.S. like it's the first time anyone ever questioned his existence before. What-thef*ck-ever.
August 1st, 2006
(0)
So I heard Peterguy is going to become a pastor. figures.
August 1st, 2006
(0)
Kent Hovind is going to be pissed at you when he figures out you stole his material. Peddling this sh*t to stupid people is how he makes his money. After he gets out of jail for tax evasion and threatening IRS agents( http://www.religionnewsblog.com/15261 )you should let him know you stole his material, he'll probably want some financial compensation. I'm sure he could of sold 12 cds and 4 dvds to these f*cks at ytmnd, you haven't sold sh*t. You're a terrible Christian.
August 1st, 2006
(0)
jbizzle, it's not about questioning one's existence. Everybody has at least asked that question from others and themselves at least ONCE jackass! This is about finding the most accurate answer. That's what natural philosophy (called 'science' nowadays) has been trying to do for a few hundred years unlike religion that's putting a blind cap on everything it can't explain.
August 1st, 2006
(0)
needs moar jesus
August 1st, 2006
(0)
5'd because of bitter Atheists trying to force their propoganda about not forcing your propaganda. I'm a big fan of irony, and I'm not even a Christian.
August 1st, 2006
(0)
Bitter atheist is picking up a lot of steam lately, must be one of those things people use to make an argument seem invalid. Oh yeah, it's a red herring. Doesn't apply to me though, I'm all about the Mythology. Zeus f*cking hates red herrings.
August 1st, 2006
(0)
@vaporizedbab: It's not that easy -- religion doesn't put on a "blind cap" on everything it can't explain. That's just it, to the believer, their religion Does explain everything. That's why religion is so appealing to so many. Religious explanations just usually choose to ignore science when conflicts happen. I still find it funny that this movie is causing so much anger, lol.
August 1st, 2006
(0)
There were never several million years of nothing. Stuff actually has to move for time to be of relevance.
August 1st, 2006
(0)
5 for the dolphin
August 1st, 2006
(0)
2'd for good music and gross oversight.
August 1st, 2006
(0)
+1 for music -4 for tremendous lack of biological history knowledge...fish became birds became mammals? WTF?
August 1st, 2006
(0)
jesus was a n*gga. i gave you 0 stars but it evolved-- sorry, intelligently designed its way into 1 star.
August 1st, 2006
(0)
Just because we don't have a theory that proves all the questions of the universe doesn't mean we have to resort to making up a all powerful being to answer those questions, it's as stupid as saying "my car broke down, its not because of the radiator leak its because god made it break down" 3'd because ytmnd shouldn't be a place for religous debates or propganda.
August 1st, 2006
(0)
Everyone knows it goes Fish > Dinosaur > THEN Bird.
August 1st, 2006
(0)
creationism, lol
August 1st, 2006
(0)
PICTURE. SOUND. TEXT. NOT A f*gGY SHORT FILM.
August 1st, 2006
(0)
*****
August 1st, 2006
(-1)
Either way my point is proven. Religion tries to explain everything while providing no reason or solid proof or reproducable evidence. If your brain is in place, you'd find that stupid! It's just as bad as string theory or scientology calling itself 'science'!
August 1st, 2006
(0)
Christian propoganda for the lose.
August 1st, 2006
(0)
1'd in the name of science, rationality, and people who actually use their brains.
August 1st, 2006
(0)
great story hope it was meant as just a story
August 1st, 2006
(0)
I hope this isn't allegorical. I do so hate allegory.
August 1st, 2006
(0)
Cry more
August 1st, 2006
(0)
why is this sponsored?
August 1st, 2006
(0)
Religion and science CAN coexist... I believe in Evolution and I go to Church every Sunday. Those that only go for one are lazy bastards that just don't want to leave the house. Those that are so angered by this Gif and .wav music file are overreacting just as much as the average religous extremist, You hear that? you are no better than them if you are offended by this.
August 1st, 2006
(0)
This YTMND lacks a proper sense of cause and effect.
August 1st, 2006
(0)
I completely and utterly agree with your observation, Intelligent Design-man, but your YTMND is awesome. Therefore, you get a 5.
August 1st, 2006
(0)
lol, christian techno also, lol religon is 4 dum ppl
August 1st, 2006
(0)
You created this anticipation by making the animation so long that it lost it's focus by the time it finished. You still get 3 for effort, though.
August 1st, 2006
(0)
religion is teh suck
August 1st, 2006
(0)
I was gonna 1 this, until I saw the comment by 'yiddish', and I agree, this site needs more Jesus. lol. Plz bring Jesus to ytmnd.
August 1st, 2006
(0)
NEDM
August 1st, 2006
(0)
The likelihood of God being like you describe in your rebuttal is very similar to the likelihood of the universe being created in this YTMND. The process of creating matter and life was not an instant deal. It took billions of years for planets to form and billions afterwards for life to exist. I think that is ample oppurtunity for a few chain reactions to occur. Also, NEDM, again.
August 1st, 2006
(0)
God is false.
<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 >>