4D "disproving" idiots disproval
Created on: September 4th, 2006
4D "disproving" idiots disproval
disproving the idiots who are trying to disprove the 4-D cube

Sponsorships:

Vote metrics:

rating total votes favorites comments
(3.67) 63 3 30

View metrics:

today yesterday this week this month all time
0 1 0 0 3,079

Inbound links:

views url
41 https://www.bing.com
5 http://www.trafficfaker.com
2 http://216.18.188.175:80
1 http://www.google.com

Add a comment

Please login or register to comment.
September 4th, 2006
(0)
Slow it down a tad.
September 4th, 2006
(0)
^ second'd but yes, Halleluja testify.
September 4th, 2006
(0)
Yeah, but VERY true. And 5 for that.
September 4th, 2006
(0)
Yeah, slow it down a little.
September 4th, 2006
(0)
Also, just a though, couldn't color (or colour, for some pricks out there) be the 4th dimension?
September 4th, 2006
(0)
Slow it down.
September 4th, 2006
(0)
Slowed it down a bit. If you think any frames are too slow tell me and I will speed them up a little bit
September 4th, 2006
(0)
slow it down for the fiven
September 4th, 2006
(0)
this whole stupid "debate" makes baby jesus whine
September 4th, 2006
(0)
You just kicked some ass. Don't slow it down any more, illiterates should be left in the dust with the other retards.
September 4th, 2006
(0)
I have no idea what the hell you're saying.
September 4th, 2006
(0)
as some one studying this field, im still not convinced that the W axis is correct for time, but nice music
September 4th, 2006
(0)
Math = No.
September 4th, 2006
(0)
YOU REMEBERED POLAND. 5'D
September 4th, 2006
(0)
"Also c*cks and poland" Win.
September 4th, 2006
(0)
You have a problem. x,y,and z are all perpendicular to one another and parallel to none. Make a 4th axis that fits the above criteria and you now have your 4th dimension.
September 4th, 2006
(0)
I guess there's no use and trying to show to idiots why they're idiots
September 4th, 2006
(0)
c*cks & poland = 5
September 4th, 2006
(0)
Just a few words of advice. When trying to act superior to others and calling them idiots, you might want to spell "response" correctly.
September 4th, 2006
(0)
5 for trying to show retards that they are just that, even though it is futile.
September 4th, 2006
(0)
hey matt, cube 2 sucked.
September 5th, 2006
(0)
didn't want to 1 this, but anytime anyone says "If you don't know..." then it forces my hand.
September 6th, 2006
(0)
5 for c*cks and poland
September 6th, 2006
(0)
Nice. -1 for "responce."
September 6th, 2006
(0)
Make a 5d object. :-D
September 7th, 2006
(0)
Good job, 5'd
September 16th, 2006
(0)
minus points. I've seen these ytmnd's quite a bit now, and so far all you guys are doing is basically making fun of the only real way we can represent 3d (4d) objects, which is on a screen, paper, scribbled on a forearm, etc. all 2d mediums. Eventually, and not too far off if I predict properly, we will have semi holographic displays, not the kind you could put your hand through nesecarily, but it would be able to display 3d images, for real. Think of those clocks that display stuff by spinning a row of LEDs. Turn that into a grid and spin it again... same principle. Now then, stop making 4d ytmnds.
September 16th, 2006
(0)
OGM!! The retards have been pwnt.
November 21st, 2006
(0)
Time is not the 4th dimension because time and space cannot exist seperately. Therefore, a 4D block can be represented with an axis just like the first, second, and third dimension. But A--...--0's 4D block is wrong becuase not every vertex has the fourth axis added on to it. I drew one with every vertex, and it looks similar, but has the fourth axis added.
November 21st, 2006
(0)
So, it's kinda wrong, but not by much.