My response to Whetstone
Created on: September 8th, 2006
My response to Whetstone
Whetstone makes a good argument, but he needs to do a little more research: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyclic_Universe_Theory

Sponsorships:

Vote metrics:

rating total votes favorites comments
(3.19) 26 0 9

View metrics:

today yesterday this week this month all time
0 0 0 0 1,103

Inbound links:

views url
12 http://allmedshoponline.com/
1 http://buy-cigaretteonline.com/
1 http://mobilephoneporno3gp.net/87-seks-flesh-porno-3gp-vei6l/
1 http://yourreplicawatches.net/brand/Ferrari/
1 http://replicahandbags.name/

Add a comment

Please login or register to comment.
September 8th, 2006
(0)
shog was going say that, but shog read big bounce theory out of vogue. then shog have to tackle multiverse theory. that ask lot of ytmnders, especially fundamentalist.
September 8th, 2006
(0)
it depend on shape of universe, dark matter, lots stuff scientist no know. it so up in air, make bad argument. it still fun think about.
September 8th, 2006
(0)
Hooray for science!
September 8th, 2006
(0)
ftw
September 8th, 2006
(0)
noone gives a sh*t
September 9th, 2006
(0)
◄Cyclic universe (or as many PMers are calling it a 'yo yo universe') 1) still needs to explain how the laws of the yo yo came about and 2) still needs to explain how the universe got here in the first place. I'll give you 2 for effort.►
September 26th, 2006
(0)
WHETSTONE, I HAVE TOLD YOU TIME AND TIME AGAIN THAT MATTER IS ETERNAL (1ST LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS) AND THAT THE NATURAL LAWS IN OUR UNIVERSE ARE SIMPLY A BY-PRODUCT OF THE MATTER ITSELF EXISTING, SO THE LAWS ARE ETERNAL! YOU HAVE BEEN UTTERLY PWNED, JUST ADMIT IT.
October 9th, 2006
(0)
hah whetstone is p3wned by wikipedia. The IRONY.
October 17th, 2006
(0)
Hey, whetstone, it's funny that you demand a theory explains all those things when you accept something like Genesis, which only gives a few sentences to explain the origin of the universe.