Setting the Record Straight
Created on: October 9th, 2006
Setting the Record Straight
None ( ._.)

Sponsorships:

Vote metrics:

rating total votes favorites comments
(2.34) 184 0 213

View metrics:

today yesterday this week this month all time
0 0 0 0 3,156

Inbound links:

views url
1 http://yandex.ru/yandsearch?p=2&text=settings+the+record+straigh

Add a comment

Please login or register to comment.
October 9th, 2006
(0)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
we love u whetsstone
October 9th, 2006
(0)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
go away plz
October 9th, 2006
(0)
lol, max got involved. in other words, YOU LOSE, GOOD DAY, SIR.
October 9th, 2006
(0)
dont be emo
October 9th, 2006
(-3)
[ comment (and 2 replies) is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-3)
how about this: just stop making christian sites all together. look at peterguy's "christian's of ytmnd" site, look at how many f*cking christians there are; like 6. nobody wants to hear your religious bullsh*t nobody cares
October 9th, 2006
(-1)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-1)
im gonna say this though: a lot of your non-christian sites are good and i enjoy them, i'd like to see more of your sites that have nothing to do with religion
October 9th, 2006
(1)
You most likely won't see any more non-Christian sites on this account as people are now in the habit of downvoting me regardless of content. I have an alt account and that is riding along nicely. Some of you reading this may have even upvoted me on my alt account! lol.
October 9th, 2006
(0)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
I upvote brothers. Still, atheists dominate the internet. I learned that the hard way a looooong time ago. They'll put all the bullsh*t they can to stop you. So against my will I pulled out of the fight. I commend your efforts but It's a hopeless effort. It even says in the bible that you cannot convert those who do not want to recive the spirit.
October 9th, 2006
(0)
You are one of the users I like. All those spam comments make me LOL.
October 9th, 2006
(0)
I still wanna duke it out socrates style. I'll PM you sometime.
October 9th, 2006
(0)
You're ok with me, man.
October 9th, 2006
(0)
fail. If WMTMP was supposed to be anti-Communist/Dictator you would have used those terms to subtitle Marx. Now that your argument has failed miserably youre claiming you never said it. How very typical of you
October 9th, 2006
(0)
"this site is not about religion" (scrolling...) "CATHOLICS".... umm.... so yeah....
October 9th, 2006
(0)
"ALT ACCOUNT" - thats horse hockey whetstone.
October 9th, 2006
(2)
seriously...what IS horse hockey?
October 9th, 2006
(-1)
"A Corner of the inernet that needs spirituality" just look at some Jeasus LOL fads
October 9th, 2006
(1)
^^^LOL POOR GrammEr for me^^^
October 9th, 2006
(-1)
triple post for me. also Internet Mssionaries Fail. unless you give me some f*cking chicken i'll downvote all your stuff AND anyone who sponsors you.
October 9th, 2006
(0)
I like this guy. I dont personaly support Religious YTMNDs. I am a christian, and I do support Anti-Sponsorship.
October 9th, 2006
(0)
It was fine until the comment about YTMND needing spirituality. YTMND isn't about religion, its about humor...and I liked you until you started moving away from the latter and into the former.
October 9th, 2006
(0)
wut?
October 9th, 2006
(-2)
LOL VERY SPIRITUALLY NEEDY CORNER OF THE INTERNETS
October 9th, 2006
(1)
Since you asked me not to, I think I'll sponsor this.
October 9th, 2006
(0)
I have no problem with you buddy
October 10th, 2006
(1)
Ok...nice job claiming you're not anti-Catholic...you're not fooling anyone other than yourself. You love pointing out Catholic wrongs while never once mentioning any Protestant brutality against Catholics and other religious groups. There's f*cking plenty of that and I've witnessed vast amounts of it. You sh*te on everyone else's beliefs while never once criticising your own. That, my friend, is bigotry. YTMND is a place where we come to laugh...not get Sunday-schooled by some wannabe zealot.
October 24th, 2007
(-1)
Ya please find in history where baptists mass murdered people, you wont/can't we were killed by every buddy inculeding protestants. Baptists were never protestants because we never came from the catholic church... just from the first one.
April 5th, 2014
(0)
"Baptists were never protestants because we never came from the catholic church... just from the first one."

The first one was the Catholic Church!
October 10th, 2006
(0)
fair enough
October 10th, 2006
(0)
I have no idea what you are trying to preach or how you are trying spread "Spirituality" by doing what you are doing. The arguments you present are not well thought out or even have the info backing them up. At the same time people tell you why you are wrong and you decide to pick and choose which people you will reply to. You only hear what you want. This is why you are like this. Either that or you are just a really good troll.
October 10th, 2006
(0)
Honest & humble answers FTW
October 10th, 2006
(0)
F*gs breathe oxygen. Whetstone breathes oxygen. Both of these statements are true. However, putting them together maxes it seem as if I am implying some sort of connection. This is extremely dishonest. You are an idiot. It's quite simple.
October 10th, 2006
(0)
Also, you fail to mention an actual reason for making your, "Who Murdered the Most People" unless you actually mean that your only purpose was to show that the crusades are Catholic and not Christian and that recent genocides are not as bad as the crusades. These seem to be conflicting tasks, so you failed in that regard, but you also failed in the second regard.
October 10th, 2006
(0)
If you want to prove that recent genocides are worse than the Crusades, you sould probably compare the Crusades to recent genocides. You may think you did, because you are a small minded idiot, but you quite obviously didn't. You compared the Crusades to the sum of all recent communist genocides, or at least those that you included (like my ytmnd said... your statistics leave a lot to be desired).
October 10th, 2006
(0)
Now, if you had treated each genocide as its own then maybe you would've been on to something. After all, Poland was an atheist, communist state at that time and you decided to compare its genocide independently and yet decided to lump all of the others together. This is obviously contradictory, and we don't even know whether or not you included the Polish figures in the aggregate sum that you gave. You also didn't cite any sources or statistics, so your entire ytmnd was completely worthless.
October 10th, 2006
(0)
Also you might want to frame the statistics with some periods of time or world population... as mentiond by someone in the comments section of your pitiful excuse for a ytmnd pointed out, the Crusades wiped out 1/6th of the world population. The Crusades were, as you actually accurately noted, driven by one organization, the Catholics. Catholicism is an organization which controlled the military of the time. Comparing Catholics to atheists in the context you did is just ridiculous...
October 10th, 2006
(0)
as you had just come from making two religious themed ytmnds telling all non-Christians, who you labeled infidels (and mostly targeted atheists it seemed), that they were going to burn in hell and that you had PROOF of it. We all know, excluding yourself alone, that your "proof" was neither reliable nor could it, even if it were reliable stand as proof as it is merely hearsay coming from a dying man.
October 10th, 2006
(0)
Now, given that you had just said that all non-Christians were going to hell and providing testimonies which you falsely presented as evidence, making a ytmnd about the murders of 3 religious groups (one of which is neither religious, nor a group, nor even positively correlated with the deaths you attributed to it) and Poland, a joke (the only accurate and non-misleading part of the ytmnd, funny as it may be), would not exactly be smart. Nor would it be honest at all to expect anyone...
October 10th, 2006
(0)
to think that you had any intention other than to repeat your previous intentions and mistakes by providing false and uncited testimonies as truthful evidence. And we were right. Now I'll respond to your other points. 1.) No, not hateful. Extremely dishonest in the context which you framed it. 2.) Done 3.) Anyone who researched could find this out...
October 10th, 2006
(0)
(not that you're setting a good example of accurate research) 4.) I feel that you are filled with too much irrationality and pompous attitude and I will continue to break down your fallacious arguments and presentations and call you an idiot as your arguments attest. I'll understand your position if you understand mine. No I won't, I'm rational. 5.) Anti-sponsorship is a terrible idea and if he implements it because of your dishonest bullsh*t and your cronies it is a sad day...
October 10th, 2006
(0)
6.) Yes, we already covered this. You think you're important and want to stand out so you that you can read and reread your words (arrogance, anyone?) even though it is quite obvious that everything you say is more than likely dishonest, incorrect, biased, and/or fallacious. And that's only the things that you have time to sit around and contemplate. Off the top of your head you don't even have time to think, just spout tired christbot cliches. You're an idiot. Glad to meet you.
October 10th, 2006
(0)
If there is no God, God=0. God+i=i. The set containing God and myself is the set containing only me, therefore I am God. You can be God too! You may say, "That's crazy talk", but not only is it true, but it emphasizes the fact that if God doesn't exist, you are free to be yourself. Your time is all you have, don't waste it on some archaic idea. We're all atheists, some just believe in one less god than the others.
October 10th, 2006
(0)
Also YTMND is full of spirituality. Pastafarianism is more than likely the largest denomination on YTMND and we believe in its purpose with great conviction. That purpose, of course, is parody, which is satire, which is humor, which is the founding principle of this site.
October 10th, 2006
(0)
Here's a final wrap-up of your dishonesty. If you were to say that people who breathe have killed as many or more people than Catholics, you would be correct. However, if you compare the number of people that Catholics killed to the number of people that people who breathe have killed, you would be putting them in a misleading context. Your mention of Catholics in this context implies that this is a determining and limiting feature. People who breathe is most certainly not a determining and limiting...
October 10th, 2006
(0)
feature of the people who are responsible for the people killed by people who breathe. Now, atheists may be a more defining feature that simply people who breathe, but that in no way makes atheists any more responsible for the people that individual atheists killed. The person or group who are both determining and limitnig factors in the deaths of the people are the ones that you can report in this context, otherwise you are reporting them out of context in a misleading and dishonest fashion.
October 10th, 2006
(0)
Now, this might even be excusable if the figures you gave even applied to all atheists. We don't expect much from you because you are quite obviously small-minded, ignorant, and incapable of original thought. However, the numbers that you compiled and placed, misleadingly, under the label of "atheists" were not even LIMITED to atheists. It is quite obvious that they were not determined by their atheism, which is leading in and of itself, but, as Motu's presentations show, you couldn't even limit them..
October 10th, 2006
(0)
I guess I can find out your alt account just by searching for Newgrounds Audio music
October 10th, 2006
(0)
to one bloated and over-represented classification. The two factors that make statistics of this sort relevent at all, determining and limiting, are both completely off base. Simply categorizing the people responsible for the deaths as "people who breathe" would, sadly, be more accurate than categorizing them as atheists, and I hope that it is clear that this would not only be a terrible characterization it would also make whoever said it an idiot. And they would be far closer to the truth than you.
October 10th, 2006
(0)
Now, even had you been succsessful in giving a determining and limiting classification for... atheists or dictators... what exactly is your point? The only discernable point you seem to have made is that a lot of people kill people. What were the reasons they did this? Certainly you're not saying that all catholics go on crusades and murder people. Nor do muslims (I bet he didn't even know that). Nor do Poles. Nor do Atheists. What is the underlying trait? Well, you didn't even attempt to consider it.
October 10th, 2006
(0)
All you wanted to do was mask your misrepresentations with a Poland joke and sensationalize enough such that people would stop blaming Christians for disrespecting others' right to their own beliefs. We don't need your misrepresentations and dishonesty here, and we certainly don't need a dishonest and misrepresenting zealot to be our spiritual leader. You are not fit to preach here. Whether or not we are "spiritually needy" (not), you are not fit to be the one to change that. Stop. Just stop.
October 10th, 2006
(0)
GET A LIFE PEOPLE
October 10th, 2006
(0)
humm...
October 10th, 2006
(0)
Why did you have to go and include that you would STILL continue, when 85% of YTMND doesn't want you hear, Jesus himself said (in the bible atleast, I am an atheist though, btw) to dust your sandles and walk away if the people you are preaching to don't want you. So do it, listen to your Jesus. Also, why do you feel it necessary to convert people to exactly what you believe in? Unless they believe exactly what you do, they are lacking "spirituality"?
October 24th, 2007
(0)
WHERE IN THE BIBLE DOSE IT SAY THAT!?! Jesus really says "Mark 16:15 And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature."
October 10th, 2006
(0)
"◄1) everyone wants to challenge me and I actually have a job and a wife. I try to at least create something interesting once a week and answer PMs so any elaborate challenge is going to be difficult, but feel free to PM me with what you had in mind. 2) I did supply sources contrary to what you claimed 3) I didn't claim atheism as a philosophy killed the most but that atheists did. So far no one has proven that wrong. I 5 sites that attempt to answer me in YTMNDs rather than spam my comments.►"
October 10th, 2006
(0)
1.) Wow, I thought your behavior was excusable because you were a child. That's scary. You're a messed up individual. 2.) Ok. 3.) I've adressed your lies here and http://ytmnd.com/users/Motu/, a site that you have viewed and commented, PROVES THAT THE STATISTICS YOU LUMPED ATHEISTS INTO INCLUDED PEOPLE WHO WERE NOT ATHEIST INCLUDING HITLER AND JAPANESE DICTATORS AND OTHERS. STOP LYING. APPARENTLY LARGECAPITALLETTERS.YTMND.COM. Child(ish).
October 10th, 2006
(0)
Also I parodied your use of atheism, but that was only because you failed to show that atheism was a determining factor. Motu proves, from your own statistics, that atheism isn't even a limiting factor. You've failed both tests of statistics. Stop preaching. Stop. You've failed on so many levels. Just stop. Stop now. I won't make any more sites about it. This is not spam and it is all here. Just stop.
October 10th, 2006
(0)
"This is a spiritually needy site." Uh.. yeah, please take that crap to Ebaum's World.
October 10th, 2006
(0)
Korf makes several good points here. I'll also argue that most of your sites really aren't equipped to engage the"spirtually needy", but rather isolate those that don't agree and puzzle many that *do.* Rather than continue to make religious themed YTMND's on a regular basis, it would be in the best interests of everyone for you to just "let it be."
October 10th, 2006
(0)
whetston, please, just go away.
October 10th, 2006
(0)
"I didn't claim atheism as a philosophy killed the most but that atheists did. I didn't claim atheism as a philosophy killed the most but that atheists did. I didn't claim atheism as a philosophy killed the most but that atheists did. I didn't claim atheism as a philosophy killed the most but that atheists did. I didn't claim atheism as a philosophy killed the most but that atheists did."
October 10th, 2006
(0)
This, ironically, I am not disagreeing with. It may be true. However, you did not prove it, and even if you did, as I have pointed out, it is a completely meaningless statement as the fact that they are atheists is no more important to the fact that they killed people as is the fact that they breathe. Also, you put it in an extremely dishonest context where it seemed you were attributing the killings to the group that would identify as the atheists (wrong) and attributing atheism as a determining factor...
October 10th, 2006
(0)
(also wrong). The inclusion of three other organizations that were both directly responsible for and determining factors in their own genocides makes both of these points inescapable. No matter what you set out to prove, the only thing you succeeded in proving was that people kill people. You have no ground to make any other claims. Period. That's all. No more of this "you misunderstood my point" bullsh*t. Your point was wrong and presented in a dishonest manner. Stop. Just stop. Leave.
October 10th, 2006
(0)
I love it that you can make a site like this and get hate mail. Hitler gets less hate mail than you! Haha! You rule the school.
October 10th, 2006
(0)
you can use control + f then type in your name to find your comments
October 10th, 2006
(0)
good to know. Good decision to stay on the down low for a while. I pray for you man!
October 10th, 2006
(0)
Korf is my biggest fan lol.
October 10th, 2006
(0)
the YTMND community does not want your religeous presence here any longer. We're fine if you're a proud christian. But don't interfere with our own set of beliefs. There are other sites that would be more receptive than YTMND in this aspect. Just hope Max gets to your alt account before we do.
October 10th, 2006
(0)
Whetstone, I don't hate you. I just extremely dislike you.
October 10th, 2006
(0)
You've said that Catholics are not true Christians. How is that not anti-Catholic?
October 11th, 2006
(0)
Why weren't you more clear about your intentions? It certainly would have helped. If you can make a YTMND, I doubt you're dumb enough to assume that you can just make an open-ended statement like that and not enrage masses of YTMNDers...
October 11th, 2006
(0)
you're so f*cking full of yourself...."spirituallyy needy corner of the internet"......f*ck you and f*ck pat robinson you pompous a*s
October 11th, 2006
(0)
Word to the wise: Someone who needs to state for the record they don't hate (insert religious/ethnic group here) has usually shown through his own action that he does, in fact, hate (insert religious/ethnic group here.) Dude. You claim Catholics aren't Christian. You call them Romanists and Popeists - that's like calling a Jew a Kike or a Hymie. You hate Catholics. Own that. If you can't have decency, have honesty. Right now you have neither.
October 11th, 2006
(0)
I'm merely responding to your request to prove you wrong. You asked for it. Here it is. Motu researched the statistics' origins, I've detailed your statistical and logical shortcomings numerous times, but here as well. The long and short of it: You're dishonest in your rhetoric and actually go so far as to blatantly lie. "So far no one has proven that wrong." As shown, obviously a lie. I think you have very few "fans", but I could tolerate someone with honest arguments and statements. You're a piece of sh*t
October 11th, 2006
(0)
raptavio, I don't have any problems with homosexual jews, but it's really funny to see Whetstone get all sappy and emo and defensive. It makes me laugh when I see it. Because Christians know that their religion is illogical. They LIKE it that way. Look at how he cries. He can't defend his position. "Spiritually Needy." Feh. This YTMND makes me LOL so hard.
October 11th, 2006
(0)
You've been proven wrong many times over. Your arguments lack any evidence or even honesty. Eat sh*t and DIE!
October 11th, 2006
(0)
"I am simply addressing each misconception I keep seeing. People accuse organized religion of being the biggest killer- and the crusades are repeated like a mantra. People need to open their eyes." lol, hypocrisy.
October 11th, 2006
(0)
This YTMND doesn't make me laugh, tarkaan... it just makes me shake my head. I really loathe it when people are blinded by their own bigotry, especially when they think that bigotry is rigteousness.
October 11th, 2006
(0)
in case you didn't know, a korf is a tiger, and a lep is a ball.
October 11th, 2006
(0)
korf means basket in Dutch. There's a sport called korfball which means basketball but it has different rules and is coed. The more you know. Stand up for your academic honesty, whetstone. Oh, your ytmnds are academically indefensible and you don't have anything to say. Word.
October 11th, 2006
(0)
You could just search "whetstone" you f*cking twat.
October 11th, 2006
(0)
searching for your name notsoez?
October 11th, 2006
(0)
"Oh, your ytmnds are academically indefensible and you don't have anything to say." Actually I have lots to say but I save most of it for my YTMNDs. Unlike you I don't have the time to argue back in forth via comments all day- and I'm really straining even to keep up with my PMs. I also have a debate I'm supposed to be working on as well as work and life. Seriously- get off my back dude.
October 11th, 2006
(0)
4chan if any corner of the internet is a very spiritually needy site. Go there :/.
October 11th, 2006
(-1)
"Seriously- get off my back dude." Seriusly, get off this site dude. You seem to have time to go talking yourself up and ignoring and even lying about the evidence that you have seen that shows that everything you said is completely misrepresentative of the truth. You're a joke. A bad one. Just stop. Leave. I hear Newgrounds and 4-Chan and Gaia Online are all atheists as well. Go, convert the weak minded with your dishonest rhetoric and flee from rationality and honesty.