How to kill a telemarketer
Created on: February 9th, 2007
How to kill a telemarketer

Add a comment

Please login or register to comment.
February 9th, 2007
(0)
will do
February 9th, 2007
(0)
MAKE IT SO
February 9th, 2007
(0)
lol didnt read
February 9th, 2007
(0)
It has been slowed down.
February 9th, 2007
(0)
How delightfully sinister!
February 9th, 2007
(0)
genious
February 9th, 2007
(0)
done and done. http://htpatmuppet.ytmnd.com/
February 9th, 2007
(0)
ytmnd slideshows are always funny to me when they're done properly
February 9th, 2007
(0)
Brilliant Sharlatan, you are our savior
February 9th, 2007
(0)
It doesn't work like that, we (the moderators) are the ones who decide if it's NSFW or SFW. The buttons are just there so we can tell what the majority of the people think (it shows up like 90% say NSFW, 10% say SFW). Just a convenience.
February 9th, 2007
(0)
Can do
February 9th, 2007
(0)
Actually, I don't mean to burst your bubble here, but it's too easy for a user to sfw his own site again. All they need to do is edit and check "I am confident this site is worksafe." If it really is worksafe, then mods won't care about the change. But I still fived this because I laughed while I watched it.
February 9th, 2007
(0)
Oh, and in case you were wondering: " 63.52% say this site is NOT SAFE "
February 9th, 2007
(0)
^well damn it sure seemed like a good idea.
February 9th, 2007
(0)
good thinking
February 9th, 2007
(0)
But it is safe for work, right? I don't want to lie with a button.
February 9th, 2007
(0)
just noticed its not on the front page..
February 9th, 2007
(0)
*clap* nice idea
February 9th, 2007
(0)
"But it is safe for work, right? I don't want to lie with a button." Depends. Are flaming homosexuals considered worksafe?
February 9th, 2007
(0)
It doesn't work. mods are just sent reports saying "x people marked this NSFW" and then they can choose to make it NSFW. The site is protected due to being in the Hall of Fame, so it can't be changed to NSFW by a mod. Besides, the site isn't actually NSFW. Just wait it out, however annoying it is, until the new moderator force is implemented and action is taken.
February 9th, 2007
(0)
why not just split the views by making dulplicates of the site?
February 9th, 2007
(0)
Some bandwagon's are worth jumping on.
February 9th, 2007
(0)
█ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █
February 9th, 2007
(0)
DO IT NOW
February 9th, 2007
(0)
5'd and NSFW'd.
February 9th, 2007
(0)
The NWS button is responsible for the collapse of the Berlin wall.
February 9th, 2007
(0)
That site needs to die.
February 9th, 2007
(0)
HEY! You left us hanging in your description! If this doesn't? If this doesn't what?!
February 9th, 2007
(0)
edit: this site is useless
February 9th, 2007
(0)
Sorry, character limit. To continue, if this doesn't really effect anything, I'm going to add any other ideas that you guys have to take it down.
February 9th, 2007
(0)
tu es intelligent
February 9th, 2007
(0)
So, Sphonix keeps saying that he can't even really delete it, but that doesn't make any sense. Anyone know what the f*ck he's talking about?
February 9th, 2007
(0)
this could work
February 9th, 2007
(0)
im in
February 9th, 2007
(0)
yessir
February 9th, 2007
(0)
Wrecksan: Sphonix had his site HOF'd by max. In short, he can't do anything with it. However, we can influence it indirectly whether by emailing Tom Mabe or by petitioning or by forcing it on top of the moderation queue.
February 9th, 2007
(0)
How was that "hacker" able to change the image to a lemon party before? Can the image still be changed in HOF mode, or was this before?
February 9th, 2007
(0)
all signs point to max as the culprit (aka savior) who changed the image on the site.
February 9th, 2007
(0)
Did this a month ago. About time it caught on. This needs to spread.
February 9th, 2007
(0)
Oh and the reason he can't delete it is because it became a moderator favorite by Max because of its popularity. Otherwise Sphoinx would of deleted it already.
February 9th, 2007
(0)
Lame. Way to state a "brilliant" idea. That music is not fit for this ytmnd. way to go........
February 9th, 2007
(0)
It can't work and there is nothing WE can do about any of this. Sorry but this is pointless.
February 9th, 2007
(0)
We already *tried* to mark it NSFW genius.
February 9th, 2007
(0)
Well, I recently contacted one of the people from his friend's list on digg.com to see if I could get some kind of AIM or MSN contact, but the kid doesn't even remember Sphonix. Another idea sh*t-canned.
February 9th, 2007
(0)
GENIUS!
February 9th, 2007
(0)
also, c*cks? zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz. zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz. zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz die.
February 9th, 2007
(0)
an idea to get it removed is to keep making sh*t like this. eventually max will probably see it and realize we dont like to so take it off. seems logical to me.
February 9th, 2007
(0)
brilliant!
February 9th, 2007
(0)
Wow, Did you think this up all on your own or did someone help you?
February 9th, 2007
(0)
Just look at #2 as #1. Get over it. NSFWing the site will make it go away? Like you think Max isnt making money off the unsolicited hits by unregistered users? 2k? If you think Max is losing money here, you are mistaken. Id like to see the invoice of his earnings, not just the "Invoice" for bandwidth.
February 9th, 2007
(0)
well, I did my part, I hope everyone else does theirs
February 9th, 2007
(0)
The mods really can't do anything. It does contain language.
February 10th, 2007
(0)
While there are better YTMNDs I don't think it's necessary to resort to methods that are accompanied by ominous music. We cannot forget... who.. we are!
February 10th, 2007
(0)
Bringing new people to ytmnd is a good thing.
February 10th, 2007
(0)
actually not a bad idea
February 10th, 2007
(0)
i just really dont want to get involved in this sort of thing.
February 10th, 2007
(0)
Even if we did get rid of the site, acting the way we are will make us no better then f*cking scientologist in the act of pressuring someone like that to remove their content, even if I do hate the f*cking site. You sicken me.
February 10th, 2007
(0)
dick
February 10th, 2007
(0)
whining and bitching has gotten us no where. If we just ignore the site, maybe it will move to a different website and bother other people.
February 10th, 2007
(0)
People just love their contraversy. I'm too busy having a good time, y'all enjoy your little fiasco.
February 10th, 2007
(0)
Cuz ya know, there weren't about 15,000 posts saying "NSFW THIS!"
February 10th, 2007
(0)
you fail, please try again ^_^
February 11th, 2007
(0)
Would doing what you suggest get rid of this site?