YTMND Search

 (1.00)

Sorry I didn't watch the hwole thing cuz the first part was a failure on your part. All matter is technically a light source. Energy is giving off in three forms: heat, light, and sound. The friction of the moon and space debris gives off a minute amount of light. Just because the light may not be visible to the human eye does not mean it doesn't exist. If you are gonna insult religions do it right. I've been doing for 10 years and God has favored me in every debate. (just kidding, I'm atheist).

 (5.00)

Billy West did both Stimpy AAAAND Ren :) he was also Doug, Bugs Bunny and Elmer Fud in Space Jam too...in other words, Billy West is god in voiceacting

 (5.00)

oh my god, that is great. the blank space and poland clinch it for me. thats so great

 (5.00)

it faulted with the 2nd theory of thermodynamics and god existing out side the realm of space, time and thought, meaning he can exist outside causality. But decent none the less, and it gets a 5, because of the people bitching about christianity, when theyll 5 the nth thing about brian peppers or steve irwin

 (0.00)

"You still fail. You start well, but it doesnt hold up. You conclude that, because the universe is here, something caused it, and so, god did it. I conclude that, the universe is here, something created it, so the big bang created it. Same logic, isnt it?" Yes more or less, I only had enough space in the YTMND to show that God exists- without going really indepth into WHICH God exists and what exactly His properties are. So yes, the goal of this YTMND was ONLY to prove that a God exists.

 (1.00)

yo guys god is a sentient being up in the clouds of space lol

 (5.00)

Since space and time are part of the same construct (space-time continuum), in the beginning when God created space (the heavens), he also created time. God has no cause or creator because time didn't exist before creation.

 (0.00)

What do I personally believe? I believe we'll never know the answer to the questions, at least not while we're in bodies here on Earth. Is God a person-type, that walks around and says, "I'm gonna make this today", or "Let's watch this", or "Let's punish this for this reason"? Maybe yes, maybe no. I don't know. I do feel though, that at the very least, there is a creative force somewhere in space and time..Wrether it has a personality or not, who knows.. It may just be a simple "spawning machine" so to

 (5.00)

Another interesting point: If God DOSEN'T exist and DIDN'T make the universe, then what did? "things floating in space?" ... No... In Order for these things to exist, they would have to be created in the first place. By assuming that they were already there to form the universe, you autimatically assume that somthing happened to make those things in the first place. And you should never make assumptions... cause you make an *** out of yourself... and umptions.

 (5.00)

Another interesting point: If God DOSEN'T exist and DIDN'T make the universe, then what did? "things floating in space?" ... No... In Order for these things to exist, they would have to be created in the first place. By assuming that they were already there to form the universe, you autimatically assume that somthing happened to make those things in the first place. And you should never make assumptions... cause you make an *** out of yourself... and umptions.

 (1.00)

Enough evangelizing. Or I will bring about my argument against Omni gods... A timeless, omnipresent god doesn't fit well with the space-time continuum...

 (1.00)

I'd like this if it were an original idea, but it's not. You take things we "know" for "fact" like three-dimensional space, linear time, etc, and then add in something completely unrelated: Causality. 20000 years ago, fire was (probably) magic. 2000 years ago, electricity was magic. 200 years ago a butane lighter was magic. Imagine what you "know" is the "magic" of "God" will be the humdrum-ho-hum of everyday life tomorrow.

 (5.00)

say that you believe in the process of evolution and the big bang. even though all creation radiated from a single infinitely dense point in space, what created that point? say that point was created from the collapsing of the entire universe into a single point. this would suggest a cycle. but when did this cycle begin? how was it started? even believing god is essentially a watchmaker and created the universe and then sat back and watch still proves that an intelligent being was in fact responsible.

 (5.00)

That's the best argument I've ever seen put together. However you will not sway me to believe in the God which you described. You described a sentient god, capable of the rational decision to begin the universe. I believe that god is space, time, and matter, all of which are linked through the undiscovered fundemental foundation of existence. My qualm is that you portray god as "Him" and though you do not make this comment but that people believe that men, specifically jesus christ, mohammad, and Moses...

 (5.00)

...were in contact with an omniscient being which created existence in a manner which has been proven false. Theists everywhere hate science for attacking their claims on a homo-centric set of beliefs. It ignorant to do so if "god" is everything. There are things smaller than the smallest know subatomic particles and perhaps things smaller than that. They exist everywhere and comprise all matter, define our concept of time and build our concept of space... that is what god is and that is everything.

 (1.00)

Your theory is wrong. Mildly intelligent, but wrong. Entropy says that energy declines due to the expansion of space but theres documented proof that eventually the universe will collapse, thereby reseting the system. Therefore its possible the universe has existed for an eternity before now. Also, "non-alive cannot make alive" is a terrible argument. When the universe began it was primordial basics like hydrogen. These are the basic blocks for life. I believe in god for differn't reasons. 1 for not funny

 (1.00)

"I only had enough space in the YTMND to show that God exists - without going really indepth into WHICH God exists and what exactly His properties are. So yes, the goal of this YTMND was ONLY to prove that a God exists." Your logic proves that the universe began, but doesn't prove WHAT caused the universe to begin. It could have been God / a god, or maybe it was something completely different. You can't prove that it was God who created the universe, OR that a conscious, thinking entity did it.

 (5.00)

"God" was brought into being at a time when people only knew about the continent they lived on, they did not know about space, the earth was flat, the Earth was the center of the universe. "God" has taken the place of this ifinity, it has brought meaning to what people could not understand. The argument about .999~ = 1 is that it will eventually stop, which it doesn't, it goes on for an infinite length, just like how the universe has been expanding and contracting for an infinite ammount of time. "Infinite" is hard to grasp, so God takes its place. So god does exist, but its existance is just a placeholder for the infinite amount of time, not some supernatural being.

 (1.00)

What you have shown is not proof of any God, merely possibility. "Why God Exists" is a very misleading title. You also fail to mention anything about the possibility of no causality in the universe. Since this "first cause" had no cause, what's to say that the rest of the universe had no cause? Certainly, observable relationships occur throughout the universe: winning is related to training, nuclear explosions are related to atomic bombs, NEDM is related to the initial site. However, nothing necessarily needs to be caused; so long as the universe has non-infinite portions, each point in time-space or piece of matter does not need to move independently. Instead, it can move as one, sort of like a giant calculation slowly figuring itself out all at once.

 (4.00)

Cont.- Are we to really so full of ourselves that we beleive we should know everything about how the universe works and such? I think not, hell, I believe that as of now, the human brain isn't even capable of comprehending such things. So many people go back to the beginning and say "God did it". Sometime in the future, assuming we survive that long, I think that the human race will be able to understand such things, and an answer will be found. I'm going to sound rude here, and I don't want to, but it sums up how I feel sometimes. I don't want to place all unknown forces in this huge universe simply as the unexplainable actions of an invisible space wizard. I know that came out harsh, but thats how it often looks.

 (0.00)

After reading over the comments from both of these sites, I only thought of one vaild coclusion, if the Law of casuality exsists, then this creats an ever constant loop, If This "God" or Entity created the universe, Matter space and Time, Then what caused this Entity? Then what caused that entity, and the one before that, and the one before that,I agree you can't prove or disprove god, but how much sense does that make, honestly?

 (0.00)

As with all arguments attempting to prove (or disprove, for that matter) the existence of God, this one has holes that sink the ship. The critical mistake is the assumption that we can make assumptions about ANYTHING preceding our universe, which is simply not the case. This lack of knowledge arises from the singularity of the Big Bang. We cannot (in the foreseeable future, and probably ever) know what existed before the Big Bang, or if indeed anything did "exist," whether it be a God, another universe composed of time/space/matter, or an average-sized, slightly overripe mango. We know nothing of if causality applied before the Big Bang. Maybe the preceding universe got bored, and decided to go out, get wasted, and Big Bang, or maybe it wasn't

 (0.00)

Paris Hilton. In any case, if causality did exist, you can't assume that the cause was a God. Even if what preceded our universe did not carry the properties of time, space, and matter, this does not mean that it was God. Perhaps what preceded the universe had other properties by which things were defined. For that matter, we don't even know that what comprises our universe began with the Big Bang. The Big Bang theory suggests not that it is The Beginning of all time, space, and matter, but rather the beginning of the organization of these properties that we recognize as our universe, and their evolution into the pattern of today. In short, God cannot be proven or disproven. Faith (n.) : Belief that does not rest on logical proof or material evidence.

 (5.00)

This is the by far the Heaviest ytmnd I've ever seen. Plus I agree that God exist outside of space time. The bible call it the Eternity for a reason.

 (5.00)

still didn't really explain why matter, time and space cannot have necessary existence, or be exempt from needing a first cause. If God is allowed to have those attributes applied to him, why can't the universe itself have them? I agree something "weird" is happening (as something "weird" is happening to explain preception and intelligence). The question is, where is this weirdness happening? And I don't see a reason why it would more likely be "God" than the universe itself.

 (4.00)

You get a 3 for being probably the only advocate of the First Cause argument to state your point in a formal, consise way as opposed to the rhetoric most others use. And an extra point for Sean Connery in a mortar-board with a stick. Problem is, you fail to convince me; I agree there is probably something beyond space, time and matter as you say. However, I do not agree with the idea that it has to be a God(s), just because we can't think of anything else to fill in the blank.

 (1.00)

CAUSALITY IS A PART OF THE UNIVERSE. Causality only exists as part of our universe, along with energy, time, space, matter, etc. Your arguement rested on something "causing" the universe, ignoring the fact that you cannot cause anything to be if causation does not exist yet. You then took the hole in your logic and called it God.

 (0.00)

Objection 3: apples to oranges. Where exactly is he doing that? He says space, time, and matter were caused. Your, "apples to oranges" comparison amounts to: 1) If A, then B. 2) C, therefore B. It not only makes no sense, it's irrelevant. Further, in objection 2, where you say God wouldn't have the time to create the universe, is meaningless. The non-existance of time is not the same as not having the time.

 (3.00)

You still haven't proved God exists. It's equally plausible that space-time-matter came from nothingness, timelessness, etc as it is plausible that it came from some 'divine being.' It's only due to the nature of logic that we have such difficulty imagining something out of nothing. That's what makes your argument so compelling - b/c it makes logical sense. However, my point is that we must step outside the confines of logic in order to understand something out of nothing.

 (4.00)

I don't buy your arguement but you're smarted than the typical theist. I would counter simply that the jump from establishing that there is a first cause that is beyond time, space and other natural phenomenon to the statement that the first cause is god is not supported by your premises or your arguements. Why should that first cause be god and not something else? There is no evidence that first cause is sentient or omni-benevolent.