Currently viewing  
 
NoAstrology's profile:

Last Online:January 2007
Member Since:2006-07-07

 NoAstrology's most recent sites:
Title Views Votes Rating
?  Fox Journalists Convert to Islam75722
(3.41)
?  Stolen Content & Ethics36939
(3.82)
?  Tin Man Finally Gets A Heart33012
(3.33)
?  What Bush Thinks About36911
(3.09)
?  Fads at the Beach45417
(3.59)

 NoAstrology's highest rated sites:
Title Views Votes Rating
?  Phoenix Wright Defends Lee Kaplan26,394755
(4.17)
?  YTMND Furry Ads?9,27552
(4.12)
?  Hypocrisy on YTMND (OMG Muhammad)3,993424
(3.92)
?  Stolen Content & Ethics36939
(3.82)
?  Incredible Exploits of the FSM10,581427
(3.81)

 NoAstrology's most recent comments:
Site When Comment
2006-11-26 01:19:56
 
perfect
+0
2006-11-24 18:32:26
 
nationstates is f*ggy
+0
2006-10-06 10:14:41
 
In many ways its like saying, "Who killed more people - black or white men? Males or females?" It doesn't tell us *why* people were killed, it simply tells us who did it. We know that the *why* of the Inquisition and Islamic terror is Christianity and Islam respectively. There are no mass murders or major acts of violence where the root cause is atheism, however. There are major acts of violence by atheists, but the root cause is politics, not the lack of belief in a deity or some sort of atheist dogma.
+0
2006-10-06 10:10:27
 
I'm sure it's been pointed out already, but Muslims and Christians have killed people because of their religion. Their development of that belief system has taught them, "Kill for God." Contrast to atheists, who have never said, "Kill for atheism." Atheist dictatorships that are responsible for mass slaughter did it due to political ideals - not all of which were hostile toward religion - not due to their personal atheism. Thus Christianity and Islam caused violence, whereas atheism did not.
+0
2006-10-02 22:14:22
 
rofl, amazing. The punchline was definately worth waiting for
+0