| the sun is still |
max |
|
0 |
2008-01-09 |
|
comment by:
comment:
Forget shirts, jackets and hats. Max needs to look at YTMND as a whole and think long and hard to himself what every single user here always needs. I of course am talking about YTMND brand condoms, pregnancy tests, c*ck rings and of course sunscreen.
|
| the sun is still |
max |
|
0 |
2008-01-09 |
|
comment by:
comment:
Sorry guys but as much as you think (and you think it because you are following what other people think) fourest has made alot of sites that made me LOL. I am talking really laughing out loud sitting on my computer by myself. Until you can amass a site list like his then you need to stfu. It's people like him who bring new users to the site and make max money from ads and donations. A person who actually wants to entertain people through his humor, graphics and sounds. That's why I have always backed him
|
| the sun is still |
max |
|
0 |
2008-01-09 |
|
comment by:
comment:
And that's the whole thing I've been talking about dealing with. But you can't turn around and say someone using 10 alts to downvote a sites is bad, but using 10 alts to upvote my own site is good because it balances out in the end. That's destructive, self-serving logic. Do you have any idea how many users have caught people upvoting their own site with a bunch of alts as soon as it was made? That isn't countering downvoters. That's forcing a site into the U&C.
|
| ?huuuuuuuge disco |
Kassius |
(3.53) |
6,889 |
2008-01-31 |
|
comment by:
rating given:
(1.00)
comment:
Wow look at mr high rated featured user talking down to a lesser ytmnd'er. I think i'll show your ytmnd to another 15 of my home g's f*ggot,
F*ck hierarchy
|
| ?(nsfw) (.)(.) |
Crowtrobot |
(3.55) |
4,820 |
2008-03-26 |
|
comment by:
rating given:
(4.00)
comment:
^btw predicting -30 comment score because, "ytmnd users without girlfriends" (lets call them), hate to see the ones with girlfriends talk about how hot they are and hate to see the girlfriend be cooperative of their ytmnd endeavors. Literally everytime i mention her on this site i get -60. Anyway any takers?
|
| ?Indy took the wrong tunnel |
wisdumcube |
(4.55) |
35,844 |
2008-04-01 |
|
comment by:
rating given:
(0.00)
comment:
It's a good rule of thumb to bitch slap featured users like dctownes because they have no idea what they're talking about and vote high on piss-poor sites. We'll miss you, douchebag!
|
| godelovesugly |
max |
|
0 |
2008-07-17 |
|
comment by:
comment:
But seriously, you should make it so people will stop posting that creepy looking kid with the deformed face. I tend to now stay away from the recently created because of that user with the fifty million alt sites. If you look at that section and click on all of the sites, at least half of them have that picture. I would give you a link to it, but I can't even look at it without losing sleep every night. Please someone know what I'm talking about. =(
|
| whipping post |
max |
|
0 |
2008-09-18 |
|
comment by:
comment:
I only ever communicate with users via comments/news posts, for most of the day to day I discuss stuff in the ytmnd dev irc chat, I would be very pleased if more people idled in there and popped in to partake in discussions. Featured users was something I made in an evening after talking with ROY4L briefly.
|
| ?Henry Paulson & Ben Bernanke |
blommer |
(4.37) |
13,109 |
2008-09-25 |
|
comment by:
rating given:
(0.00)
comment:
Lesko used to come into the coffee shop that I barista'd at. Talk about a guy that needs a serious kick in the ovaries...and just in case you are wondering, yes, he does always wear those retarded question-mark suits. Oh and he drives a question mark VW Bug. He should play the Riddler in the next batman. There's a YTMND for a featured user to make.
|
| ?Boo f*cking Hoo |
amindlessidiot |
(3.66) |
2,769 |
2008-12-04 |
|
comment by:
rating given:
(1.00)
comment:
Though I agree that we should do away with the featured users section that fact is that people have been talking about what killed YTMND since the day I made this account. (I'm going to spam this now)
|
| ?SHOUTOUTMND: Part 3 of # |
prairiedogeric10 |
(3.90) |
1,829 |
2008-12-10 |
|
comment by:
rating given:
(0.00)
comment:
I think I am the only user not shout out'd. That hurts man, after we killed gr33nscr33n I know we said we weren't going to talk anymore, but damn.
|
| ?ANGRY GYPSYS hacked my Pretentious YTMND |
Smith-Man |
(3.93) |
14,785 |
2008-12-07 |
|
comment by:
rating given:
(1.00)
comment:
not saying all non featured users are queers. i was talking to the no featured users that were queers. misunderstanding....ya queer.
|
| ? |
|
(0.00) |
0 |
UNKNOWN |
|
comment by:
rating given:
(1.00)
comment:
lets think about it. this little group of users is referring to themselves as "saving ytmnd", so you guys have become a select group that talks to littler users like they are scum. You guys are just as bad as featured users.
|
| You Can't Judge A Book By Its Cover |
max |
|
0 |
2009-04-22 |
|
comment by:
comment:
Yep. I didn't want to be so blunt bu you are right filibuster: ytmnd is really dead. And Umfuld, Up and coming only shows 10 sites on the frontpage. "Hundreds" what are you talking about? I think the point you are trying to make is that its harder to get exposure, but that is MORE due to a lack of users issue than an overabundance of sites rated over 4. Ratings are just an abstraction that tells us how much we will like a site, and acts as a filter for exposure. Beyond that ratings have no value.
|
|
|
| ?YTMND Safe For Kids? |
jasonkrowe |
(4.11) |
2,396 |
2009-05-01 |
|
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
Parents need to know that this site isn't suitable for kids due to the user-supplied content, which often features vulgarities, hate speech, violence, and more.
Families can talk about why people laugh at the expense of others. Where's the line between poking fun and hurting someone's feelings?
|
| ? |
|
(0.00) |
0 |
UNKNOWN |
|
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
thats some sort of joke right? like youve been enlightened over 3 years how stupid you are yet making virtually the same comments you made 3 years ago. id like to see what losers youre talking to while posting on ytmnd because it sure isnt the users of ytmnd. i know your alts are primarily for upvoting your own comments even tho the real story is that youre just another personality of umfuld. this place will be officially dead when creators listen to commenters like you.
|
| ?Easy Win |
christbt |
(3.11) |
529 |
2009-07-10 |
|
comment by:
rating given:
(1.00)
comment:
This is f*cking ridiculous...user makes site with old-ass image, I call it out and downvote it, and then user talks sh*t to me like I'm the dumbf*ck...gotta love this website
|
| ?TOURNEY3: Is Ochobobo Going To Make Somethi... |
Ochobobo |
(4.07) |
4,536 |
2009-07-19 |
|
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
"You got caught using alts to vote multiple times on the same sites" I am being 100% honest when I say that umfuld is the only one that has said this before you. Also I am not trying to be a martyr silly. I am just a guy who is getting tired of the grief and can sympathize with some other users that left. "How can you possibly not get what umfuld is talking about?" Oh I understand exactly what he is talking about, but having a good vote spread means investing way too much into ytmnd.
|
| ?Moot man delves into your fathers closet in search ... |
dam |
(3.23) |
2,246 |
2009-09-14 |
|
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
hey guys its me moot i'm just downloading 5 gigabytes of hentai and then i will watch all of it aha ahahaha after i am done with it i will go to 4chan and talk about what i saw with other users ololololol
|
| A Glorious Dawn |
max |
|
0 |
2010-04-04 |
|
comment by:
comment:
For the record, I thought the last update was awesome and I like everything but black on white text and Ed Hardy t-shirt style graphics on the new one. Oh, and I wish my own name were a different color than 'random user' like it used to be because I only care about my own comments. That's the narcissism in me talking. It's the only thing worth listening to. Also, this is all off the record, just like last time.
|
| ?Will You Remember Poland? |
RonaldRayGun |
(3.76) |
1,809 |
2010-04-20 |
|
comment by:
rating given:
(3.00)
comment:
i did not use alts to downvote anything. are you talking about the site? or comments? because i did neither. let me also point out that one of the main ways a user can look like a bitch is to publicly accuse people of doing things to them based on 0 evidence.
|
| ?Periodic Table of YTMNDers |
prairiedogeric10 |
(4.08) |
3,036 |
2010-04-27 |
|
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
Yeah, Lacrossestar83 makes a crapload of wacky sites that involve his own unique ear rape tracks, bizarre flashing gifs and/or him playing Lacrosse or the Ukelele. He also likes to make a bunch of sites attacking his enemies like RublilacEx, GaryGnu and others. Prairiedogeric10 makes a lot of sites where he talks on the microphone about various random stuff. He also has his own variety of strangeness, but nothing like Lacrossestar83. Lax is probably either a crack user or LSD user. PDE definitely likes pot and most likely shrooms. What's ironic about PDE is that his most highly rated site is about you.
|
| ?SITE ABOUT UM..........FOLDING LAUNDRY |
prairiedogeric10 |
(2.38) |
1,973 |
2010-06-08 |
|
comment by:
rating given:
(1.00)
comment:
you have no idea who you are talking to or what you are doing. i am simply a user who does not like your site. sorry. you failed.
|
| ?My Drunk Ex-Wife |
braxton |
(4.00) |
5,881 |
2010-07-06 |
|
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
i will echo the "never ask for advice on the internet" sentiments, especially on a website where 97% of its users have never even talked to a girl before. but if you want advice anyway, i'd say don't lose custody of your kid. get yourself a good "dad's rights" lawyer, and don't miss out on seeing your kid grow up. that's pretty much all that matters.
|
| In the wee hours |
max |
|
0 |
2010-06-26 |
|
comment by:
comment:
I realize it's there, I just don't like the new set up where I have to go looking for comments that have been made on my sites, especially old ones. The old way, new comments were clearly visible from my profile page as soon as I went there. You couldn't miss them. Now I can't see them without going fishing for them and people can have a full conversation on a site of mine without me knowing.<br /><br />A perfect example of this is on the site I made this observation on. It belongs to daily user who did not realize for a week that 3 people were talking on a site of his. Its so easy to miss now.<br /><br />I like the idea of the social enhancements max made, but a couple of the changes to the old way seem to have decreased the very social factor they were meant to increase.
|
| ?an awkward bluff |
lickitwellhiem |
(4.65) |
64,075 |
2010-08-13 |
|
comment by:
rating given:
(0.00)
comment:
i'll level with you. i am extremely erratic and far too excited most of the time. but it's your block-headed, childishly insulting statements that bring my focus onto you.<br /><br />you are far more relentless and unfriendly than me<br /><br />[i]and i would be surprised if one single person here disagreed with me on that[/i]<br /><br />so don't fucking pretend for a second that you hold some moral higher ground over my behavior on ytmnd just because you carry on your own personal crusade inside your own bullshit think-tank-to-save-ytmnd.<br /><br />you say things like your above statement yet when it's convenient you go the opposite and praise me. i can only assume you flip-flip like this in private with other users just as much [i]if not more[/i] than you've done with me, which also leads me to believe you are as erratic as me - you just channel it into an overly obsessed, overly text-wall-posting online persona you have frequently seeked to redefine with alt accounts.<br /><br />and in all honesty, i like you and your typical faggotry, even though no one has ever used the internet to insult me so thoroughly and creatively close to (yet missing) the actual truth.<br /><br />all this talk is great, but when it comes to comment threads like this you seek to hurt others and make yourself look good. everything you say seeks to fulfill this goal. so on that note, seeing as this is a classic umfuld rant/insult/jerkfest i'm ending this with a [b]fuck you[/b] [i]Umfuld[/i].
|
| ?----------> AH! <---------- |
gr33nscr33ngay |
(4.31) |
8,357 |
2010-09-14 |
|
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
if thats the case, you should not<br /><br />1) private message me talking shit about specific users<br />2) create a shared account with me<br />3) respond to my comments<br />4) respond to my pms<br />5) use other website to share content with me<br />6) chat with me in meebo<br />7) post images on imageshack that have to do with me, image captures with my username in them<br /><br />and then you should not get upset and pretend like none of that ever happened. you're silly. i forgive you.<br /><br />[b]:P[/b]
|
| In the wee hours |
max |
|
0 |
2010-06-26 |
|
comment by:
comment:
I don't think farkle started out making moon man sites. That makes it seem like he was an independent user to me.<br /><br />Also I talked to him on MSN once or twice and he kinda seemed like a 10 year old kid that would be grounded if his parents saw what he did on the internet.
|
| ?I'm leaving indefinitely. |
eightbitprodigy |
(3.80) |
2,013 |
2010-10-16 |
|
comment by:
rating given:
(0.00)
comment:
I remember when I used to think like you, eightbitprodigy. I've always been mad when my sites were downvoted, too. Actually I gave up long time ago, but not because I think ytmnd has become full of shit, but because I don't recognize this site anymore. Many things have changed (and I'm not talking about the much needed improvements) to the point of being a place completely different from where I belonged. This site left too much space for childish experiments, half-assed trolling, confusing creations; but luckily I don't waste my time complaining much about it (that's not to say that you're wasting your time.) Instead I try to observe the evolution of this site, which is now different like a teenager inexplicably angry with their parents. If I tried to make a new site just now (I have more than 4 in my head and I'm incredibly afraid to make and upload them) it could get downvoted in a matter of minutes. And, not to be cocky, I made good stuff. But, recently, good stuff as I know it is kinda underrated. Take that as one of the few reasons I back your decision completely. Maybe we and the other "good users", as I like to call them, could come back making sites and forget about the time when ytmnd was a place full of crap. Crap is the new black, I suppose. But I'm not against it, like you I have very limited power.
|
| ?wang chi gets into it |
fourest |
(4.62) |
30,408 |
2010-10-18 |
|
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
ok geez, lets pretend fourest spam IMs his newest site link, along with the message<br /><br />"sup? we haven't talked in ages btw i made a ytmnd site 'karma' lol"<br /><br />to roughly 200 internet people, some of them obscure ytmnders. how many of them are actually gonna click on it let alone log in to vote? maybe 20? maybe more? probably less. certainly not 200 but he's going for views as well. ok so lets say he get 15 5's from that, on top of the auto 5s he gets here from people he doesn't need to IM, plus the auto 1s from, well, users like you, and so within a few hours the site has 40-50 votes with a 4.4 rating, locked in U&C for the week, lingering up at the top or the middle.<br /><br />plus, have you ever happened to have been on spy when fourest posts a site? boom, same handful of close fourest "funny internet user" buddies are there with 5s, and then wait - whos that user who ive never seen before who came in only to view and vote 5 on the fourest site? hmm, 06 user, 06 user, 06 user, 04 user, 05 user, all no name users too.
|