YTMND Search

 (5.00)

half the war is spent explaining 9/11 and cloud based gaming. humanity loses. the robots were lady gaga the whole time. any remaining survivors must endure mountain dew flavored dorito's and unreliable internet connections. [i]Surviving humans have two choices.[/i] [b]Option 1: FREEDOM[/b] You are on your own, but if you run out of internet, you die. [b]Option 2: SUBMISSION:[/b] join the robots for unlimited reliable internet, live forever, but you'll be enslaved and have to do shit you don't want to dew.

 (0.00)

wtf I didn't expect all this beautiful comments, I have no words rly...<br />Don't worry I am working on a better one, same base but adding more sounds

 (5.00)

Lol I can't believe All Your Base is 15 years old now. What have I RUININGed with my LAIFE?

 (0.00)

Uh, that's what the song's refrain was based on

 (4.00)

also, it makes you look either dumb or weak to beg people to vote 5. people are going to vote what they are going to vote based on how much they like it. you pleading for the best is telling people to change that out of sympathy.

 (0.00)

judging by how i've visualized him based on his comments alone, i would say picture 7, 9 or 10. <br />and out of those i'd pick #7 or 10 too tough to pick one

 (1.00)

i have never heard anything more cringeworthy, except the actual song this is based off of

 (0.00)

My career is not all that relevant, actually, despite the coincidence of both of us working for radio in one way or the other. In fact, if I were a McDonalds cashier, or a janitor whose career consists of wiping up vomit every day, or a large corporate CEO, what I said is just as valid or invalid.<br /><br />I know your alleged core argument in various guises.<br /><br />What you are saying is that people who shuffle around money make the decisions. By this, you are trying to make the whole process look cheap and corrupt. You do this as an indirect way to really say that q959fm is a worthless person and that his career is worthless. But the problem with this is that these same decision makers largely base their decisions on ratings. Meaning that more ratings = more money for them. There are exceptions here and there, but that is what they are, exceptions.<br /><br />Also, I don't know why you are talking about the US government for. Radio in the states is mostly private sector, having little connection besides certain press releases and FCC regulations.<br /><br />I did not call you a commie and I do not know why you dragged this issue in.

 (5.00)

5 but seriously there could've been a really funny image based on that title

 (0.00)

"How do you know that?"<br /><br />Based upon the best currently available scientific evidence and reasoning.<br /><br />"Maybe Santa Clause exists, too?"<br /><br />There is no evidence to support this, unless you define Santa Claus as something else, like the historical St. Nicholas of Turkey, the guy with a fake beard at the mall and red clothes in December or maybe if you define him as an aardvark.

 (0.00)

I did my best based on your descriptions. I never saw the original image myself.

 (5.00)

This isn't a sequel though. It's a separate franchise based off the http://hevsuit.ytmnd.com mythos, envisioned by houseofcards.

 (4.00)

i guess it is smooth but I don't get it, has there been some kind of thing that barack obama has done in base-ket-ball that I'm not aware of?

 (1.00)

The servers are based in the US so it's actually an American website, cockflea.

 (1.00)

im downvoting comments. so what. downvote all my sites. voting should never been interent based.

 (5.00)

Great site, but the idea while well intentioned is not the best.. People are already extremely deranged here with their byzantine upvoting downvoting manipulation factionalization that everyone seems to love so much, the addition of money to this site's bizarre currency of internet affection would just set this into place overdrive on course for the world's most uninteresting implosion. <br /><br />Second, it's based on the theory that this site makes money.

 (5.00)

I sure can ummy. Just look at the sites these schmucks have posted. 0 effort, 0 creativity, and 0 humor. While Fourest does has his fair share of fans that upvote all of his sites not every user has that established of a fan base. These same talentless idiots go around voting 1 on everything other than their friends circle jerk. While the majority of the talented/funny users long since stopped making sites.

 (0.00)

I'm just bummed that Photoshop can't export animated PNGs.<br /><br />I am being asked by my clients to produce more video work. I have mostly been using low-end consumer stuff like iMovie which actually works pretty well for simple things. But for animated logos and so forth<br />I use my 3d app or Photoshop CS 6 which has some decent video editing features similar to Premire. I know how to use after effects and premier but I don't own them and I refuse to subscribe to creative cloud. I'm considering final cut pro or avid but I'd love to find a video editor that exports to PNG animations too. so far I haven't found a solution.<br /><br />I'm a print guy and I've been avoiding web for years but I've read some pretty good write ups on smashing.com about using fireworks for web development and user interface design despite its age. I want to avoid the template based apps like Wordpress Dupral. I'd use Muse or dream weaver maybe except for the Adobe subscription bullshit.

 (0.00)

While blocking comments is useful and desirable, I am more interested in preventing unfair voting practices. If one person has 10 or 20 alts then they can make sure your site is off the front Page more quickly and does not receive a fair rating based on the idea of one vote per person.<br /><br />If an alt downvote campaign hits your site for whatever reason then fewer people will end up seeing it. I think this is much worse in all fairness than receiving a lot of negative comments.

 (0.00)

Max makes money from ad revenue based on user contributions. Sharing those profits increases those contributions.<br /><br />It's a win-win if you can think outside the box.

 (5.00)

DEVELOPERS, DEVELOPERS, DEVELOPERS, DEVELOPERS, DEVELOPERS, DEVELOPERS!<br /><br />(Also, it's quite uncommon for me to find a user who uses the Opera browser... The only time I use an Opera-based browser is through one of my Nintendo consoles)

 (5.00)

Any attempt to make something transformative based on *anything* that has *ever* been seen on this site results in condescending, elitist venom. All that's left is users bitching about how no one ever produces anything, and users making sites about other users. THIS is what killed YTMND.

 (0.00)

wow man someone basing a ytmnd off of another ytmnd? it's not like that's ever happened on this site before

Makes sense to me: Internet begins as method for sharing research [papers] between "experts," w/ such usage/content embedded into its construction, ie HTML formatting (<h1, 2, 3...> vs. <p>). Images are [eventually] included as placeholders, often merely signifiers of more/better possible visual representation. They must be compressed as efficiently as possible due to tech restraints. Over time, tho, usage changes, w/ shift in participants, stakeholders, & economics of the space. We're a visual culture and it follows that, as more people entered the set of users and tech increased capacity to move info at greater speeds, the text-based web was supplanted by visual language, first w/ images of consumption (including porn) and further w/ an influx of pop cultural ref, documenting the minutia of personal/daily life, cat pics, etc. Those lovingly terrible "homepage" GIFs of the '90s were the visual language of a particular moment of internet usage, design, population. YouTube comes along and provides a different way to express this wider usage of visual, popular and/or personal documentary narcissism: a flood of Vlog response videos to every semi-popular post. The "participatory" comment section proves interesting briefly, then dead, as it merely iterates through response patterns of binary critique and lowest common denominator trolling. Then comes Tumblr, where visual response to visual culture post (often) allows for a more nuanced, less literal exchange between participants. GIFs are reborn as signifier for "what I mean to say is..." By late 2000s, a generation of "digital natives" speak to each other only thru language of found imagery, producing little content but "communicating" (IMO, tho better words may exist) thru recombinant meme production and pop culture stand in. And boom: 2012 is the year of the GIF. See also: http://www.scribd.com/doc/25128416/Ways-of-Seeing-John-Berger

 (0.00)

also forgot to say, the list of users here is based on how much trolling they do, not on how good their sites are

 (0.00)

Even though he has been nasty to me a couple times in the past as well as to some good friends, I don't feel like one's religion should be treated as a trollish trait. A person's religion is something that they sincerely believe in, whether or not based on actual facts. Trolling is about deliberately provoking people.

Hardly fair considering nobody votes based on quality.

I think what is going on is that YTMND is very search engine friendly. I have been to at least one search engine and e-business conference. <br /><br />Off the top of my head<br /><br />-YTMND has a constantly changing from page. (the changes mostly being text based)<br />- has a great deal of text on the front page<br />- has an enormous amount of changing links on the front page<br />- makes good use of meta tags everywhere<br /><br />Another possibility is that people are posting YTMND links on other sites like in the old days.

 (0.00)

Closed minded? Peer reviewed studies show that raising a black child by white parents yields a child comparable or better in testing than white children:<br />http://www.nytimes.com/books/first/j/jencks-gap.html<br /><br />https:<br />//lesacreduprintemps19.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/the-minnesota-trans<br />racial-adoption-study-a-follow-up-of-iq-test-performance-at-adolescenc<br />e1.pdf<br /><br />http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6872626<br /><br /><br />based on this evidence, it seems quite clear that criminal behavior are environmental, rather than genetic

 (0.00)

So they invade a country based on the fact some guy made a video taking credit for it? Come on! Also, in 2007 there was a new bin Laden video released where he had a black beard (no gray hair), whereas in the old videos it was gray...