YTMND Search

 (0.00)

LOL scientology...

 (0.00)

While I don't doubt its accuracy, I have to say that a Wikipedia article really isn't "research". If I wanted to defend Scientology I'd just say the article was written by some internet guy with an agenda.

 (5.00)

AHAHHAHAHAHA!!! OWNED! f*ck scientology!

 (0.00)

scientology isn't work

 (5.00)

First, I outright love synth music and Howard Jones is no exception. Second, I never though Scientology was a religion to begin with. 5 Stars.

 (0.00)

And Wikipedia is not a bastion of truth in knowledge. Scientology might be bat sh*t crazy, but it is as much a religion as any other bat sh*t crazy religion.

 (0.00)

According to this article, scientology is just as real as every other religion.

 (1.00)

That's pulled out of someone's butt. I imagine it's based on the thing Reader's Digest made up a long time ago about how "Scientology was started because of a bet made against L. Ron Hubbard that he couldn't start his own religion"

 (5.00)

I'm sorry, I just don't a damn whether it's from Wiki or not. Scientology sucks balls.

 (5.00)

Scientology is as true as any other religion

 (5.00)

scientology is serious business! and sucks major ass!

 (1.00)

Scientology and this YTMND both fall into the class of dumb things people should ignore.

 (4.00)

and WHO CARES IF ITS WIKIPEDIA, SCIENTOLOGY SUCKS

 (5.00)

True or not, Scientology needs to get pwned more often

 (4.00)

Hubbard himself once said that Scientology was not a religion.

 (2.00)

too bad the text has been removed from the wiki. But anyway scientology sucks.

 (5.00)

Looks like the scientology nazis are at it again. They keep reverting it on WP. Someone else need to revert it back because i don't want to be hit with the 3RR.

 (0.00)

Yes, but people can easily edit any info up there. And since scientology is a major issue right now, it wouldn't be a surprise to see that someone edited it with false info.

 (5.00)

lol, scientology

 (1.00)

yeah i would believe scientology is a religion... except for the lack of something we call god. f*ck scientology.

 (0.00)

Even though I support the insulting of scientology, wikipedia is not a reliable source

 (5.00)

world. Tell me how scientology is on par with that.

 (1.00)

So Christianity's insane tale has had longer to build and was received by the uneducated superstitious people of 2000 years ago a lot better. So what, Scientology and Christianity are equally insane.

 (5.00)

Nitros, they're not equally insane because scientology was created in the 20th century by some regular shmoe, has totally illogical claims, and also doesn't even claim to conflict with any other religion (which makes no sense).

 (1.00)

Making fun of scientology was never funny and never will be, mainly because it has like 17 followers worldwide

 (3.00)

ScndPiston: Know what the difference between a 'religion' (like xtianity) and a 'cult' (like scientology) is? Ans: About 200-300 years.

 (0.00)

Thats why it says "Scientology is a religious movement..."

 (5.00)

Scientology doesn't even sound believable. It's totally batf*ck insane.

 (0.00)

Got out my Lexicon Universal Encyclopedia (bought in 1989) and here's what it says: "Scientology is a quasi-scientific and religious movement that espouses the quest for effective use of the individual's mental abilities. The movement was inspired by th

 (0.00)

And the main difference between Scientology and Christianity is that Christianity is based on events that actually happened according to most historians, even though many people don't think those events were caused by God. Lord Xenu and his spirit-catche