STFU. (An agnostic's view)
Created on: October 8th, 2006
STFU. (An agnostic's view)
Who takes this sorta sh*t seriously on YTMND, anyways? Go talk about this with your art college friends.

Sponsorships:

Vote metrics:

rating total votes favorites comments
(3.66) 38 2 33

View metrics:

today yesterday this week this month all time
0 1 0 0 1,232

Inbound links:

views url
No one has linked to this site. ( ._.)

Add a comment

Please login or register to comment.
October 8th, 2006
(0)
YES! That stuff doesn't belong on YTMND! Hopefully someone will listen to this. This is coming from a Christian who doesn't think this is the place for religious debate. There are boards for that, I go on one myself. When I come to ytmnd it's for a laugh.
October 8th, 2006
(0)
Do we have any proof leprechauns exist? No. Do we have any proof leprechauns don't exit? No.
October 8th, 2006
(0)
me love you long time
October 8th, 2006
(0)
you want proof? http://truthatlast.ytmnd.com :) (note: although the site is real, it's not to be taken seriously!)
October 8th, 2006
(0)
Oh sh*t, you got me Glamiss.
October 8th, 2006
(0)
Do we have proof that You have a penis? No. Do we have any proof that you dont have a penis? No
October 8th, 2006
(0)
I have proof. By the way, beast404 is sending a good message across. These don't belong on here. *I am a Christian*
October 8th, 2006
(0)
It's okay. But to devalue an unanswerable question is foolish. No question can be answered fully. The question is the answer. I hope your fingers warm up soon.
October 8th, 2006
(0)
I thank you. I'm a Christian, and proud of it. But I respect the beliefs of other people. And I don't even wanna see this preachy stuff all over.
October 8th, 2006
(0)
I'm not devaluing an unanswerable question, I'm simply stating that we don't proof for either claim, and therefore, people should stop arguing about it.
October 8th, 2006
(0)
I can see your YTMND turning into a discussion board, because everyone on here has a good opinion with the exceptions of the obvious.
October 8th, 2006
(0)
Take your own advice.
October 8th, 2006
(0)
Even though I'm a believer, I really hate all the Religion/Anti-Religion based YTMNDs that are being created. Don't question my faith and don't make other people question yours. We're all on YTMND to enjoy it, not to discuss a never ending argument. A four for you.
October 8th, 2006
(0)
In saying "take your own advice" you have clearly indicated your willingness to not take his advice, and when one does not take the advice he advises, one becomes a hypocrite. So STFU. also FAV'd
October 8th, 2006
(0)
...your fingers are doing WHAT to cold? But seriously, your ytmnd makes me fairly happy. I dont' come here for religious debate.
October 8th, 2006
(0)
(0)
+1 for c*cks.
(0)
I'm an atheist but it's cool to be agnostic. After all, agnostics and atheists moralize alike. Because I'm a jerk and appreciate the irony.
October 8th, 2006
(0)
w00t! ATHEISTS AND AGNOSTICS FOR STFU!!!
October 8th, 2006
(0)
Why god exists: By tommy, Age 8.
October 8th, 2006
(0)
Just for the record: Agnosticism ≠ Atheism.
October 8th, 2006
(0)
BURDEN OF PROOF. What you are talking about is weak atheism, not agnosticism. "Agnosticism is the philosophical view that the truth value of certain claims particularly theological claims regarding the existence of God, gods, or deities is unknown or inherently unknowable. Some agnostics take a stronger view that the concept of a deity is incoherent, thus meaningless and irrelevant to life."
October 8th, 2006
(0)
Weak atheism is not a belief, and is not anywhere near the same as strong atheism, the belief that god does not exist. Weak atheism is not a belief but in fact a lack of belief due to a lack of rational evidence. Weak atheism is the rational default for the position you were advocating unless you somehow have rational proof that it is impossible to prove the existence of god, which is highly unlikely. Although, since religious zealots don't know anything, weak atheism is often confused with agnosticism.
October 8th, 2006
(0)
For a lengthier explanation of the difference see the bottom of http://ytmnd.com/sites/profile/626134
October 8th, 2006
(0)
Uh, Korf, you just basically said they're the same thing.
October 8th, 2006
(0)
ALSO C*CKS FTW
October 8th, 2006
(0)
Alright Korf, watch this YTMND again, and reread what you said. People here are making ytmnds saying "GOD (doesnt) EXIST FOR THESE REASONS,) whereas most of it is speculation and rationalization without facts. What this YTMND was stating was that "If you don't have any concrete proof for either, then there's no way that you're going to prove it, and should therefore, shut the hell up." Atheism advocates that "God doesnt exist, period," What this ytmnd is advocating is that we can't prove it either way.
October 8th, 2006
(0)
And the stupid arguement about it should stop. So, save me you psuedo intellectual blather, I know what I believe, and I don't need you nit picking stupid details so that you can pat yourself on the back for trying to sound smart. GTFO.
October 8th, 2006
(0)
Moreover, you define weak atheism as "a lack of belief due to a lack of rational evidence." Didn't you say in your little excerpt from wikipedia that "Some agnostics take a stronger view that the concept of a deity is incoherent, thus meaningless and irrelevant to life." Now, if the concept of a diety is incoherent, wouldn't agnostics have "a lack of belief due to a lack of rational evidence?" Way to make yourself sound like an idiot.
October 8th, 2006
(0)
lol
October 8th, 2006
(0)
Hmm, agnosticism is a claim to knowledge, and atheism literally means A (without) theism (god belief). Agnostic is (A) without (knowledge) about X. So yeah, agnostic is more of a helper term.
October 23rd, 2006
(0)
hmmm, I guess that makes sense, but i still think i'll be religious in the privacy of my own home.
(0)
truth