Hillary's New Tax Proposal
Created on: June 2nd, 2007
Hillary's New Tax Proposal
socialism is lose

Sponsorships:

Vote metrics:

rating total votes favorites comments
(3.36) 119 9 124

View metrics:

today yesterday this week this month all time
0 0 0 0 6,128

Inbound links:

views url
1 http://news.google.com/

Add a comment

Please login or register to comment.
June 2nd, 2007
(-2)
[ comment (and 4 replies) is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-2)
yes i feel a new rising of republiTMND!!!
June 2nd, 2007
(0)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
Lets not forget Edwards. Seriously, their healthcare proposals alone.
June 2nd, 2007
(4)
Edwards has no chance to win though, so it isn't really important what he thinks, lol
June 2nd, 2007
(0)
5 cause I hate that cvnt with the heat of a thousand suns
March 31st, 2008
(0)
http://ivoted4nader.ytmnd.com/ I HATE EVERYONE.
June 2nd, 2007
(1)
...yeah, who needs taxes when you can just pile another couple trillion on to the national deficit!!!
June 2nd, 2007
(-2)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-2)
cut spending on entitlement programs, don't steal my money by raising taxes
June 2nd, 2007
(0)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
it's the 'debt' not the 'deficit' BTW
June 2nd, 2007
(0)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
lol
March 29th, 2008
(-2)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-2)
Who needs money when the government can decide how to spend it for you? Money doesn't belong to individuals it belongs to the State, isn't that right you Socialist sheep?
March 29th, 2008
(0)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
Because 5% of the population controlling 75% of the money is always a good thing, right? Under a socialist system the people who would be -most hurt- isn't going to be the 'average american'. Do you have any idea how much -good- health insurance costs? Most companies AREN'T giving benefits anymore... State and Federal employees get them though! If Universal Healthcare IS implemented, the upped taxes will be balanced out by the fact that you're NOT going to be paying for a lot of other services.
March 29th, 2008
(-3)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-3)
Great idea Eldred! Instead of enriching the nation so that everyone's wealthier let's just make the poor entirely dependent on rich people's money and government intervention! How could the poor possibly survive without sucking the government's tits? Supporting the poor's lavish lifestyle of recreational drug use, gang violence, and unemployment requires government aid!
March 29th, 2008
(-1)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-1)
Oh, listen to it wail about how good the poor have it compared to him. Poor deprived baby.
March 29th, 2008
(-2)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-2)
If anyone's the baby it's the people who expect the government to take care of all their needs. Grow up and take care of yourself, the government isn't your mom and it shouldn't have to be.
March 29th, 2008
(-3)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-3)
Didn't you fools learn that you were supposed to become financially independent when you left your parents' house? It doesn't look like it. Now how about you go take a quarter from some evil buisnessman and buy yourself a lollipop so you'll finally shut your mouth.
March 29th, 2008
(-1)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-1)
Listen to the teenager talk about life outside their parents' house. This gets better and better! Keep going, kid.
March 29th, 2008
(-2)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-2)
"A tiger does not take insults from sheep" - that's a proverb which you should think about. The Communist party in America is in no position to make demands of free individuals.
March 29th, 2008
(-1)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-1)
Too bad you're the one in the minority, buddy. A majority of the people in this country support universal health care, social programs, and environmental regulations. Which is why I suspect you're so angry-you've read the writing on the wall and seen that your ideals are on the way out. But, by all means, continue with your tantrum. It's amusing.
March 29th, 2008
(5)
The only president in recent history that had a year of budget surpluses has been Bill Clinton, the prince of medicare. So lol @ you.
March 29th, 2008
(-3)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-3)
My ideals won't die until I do, and I'm not going out without a fight. There are other Americans who want small government besides me. We will make a stand and you can't stop us. Will you ban axes? Will you ban knives? Will ban baseball bats? Will you ban the hands on my arms? You can't stop my resistance communists and I will bring you pain for treading on my freedom. The government doesn't own me.
March 29th, 2008
(2)
Get therapy.
March 29th, 2008
(-1)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-1)
I'd rather be imprisoned than pay taxes to you. At least in jail the government has to pay to support me instead of me paying to support it. You can't get anything of mine, I'd rather die than give it to you.
March 29th, 2008
(0)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
Have you made that psychiatrist appointment yet?
March 29th, 2008
(-2)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-2)
The desire for freedom and formation of capitalism are the natural ways people act. Communism is the mental disorder, and that's why Communist regimes need to kill so many people. The amount of death and suffering would actually be lower in the long run if all Communists were killed, because, as history has shown us, when that system gains power it kills and oppresses dissenters.
March 29th, 2008
(1)
I meant for your delusions that people are coming after you and for your insistence on projecting extremism onto everyone. That's not a healthy mental state.
March 30th, 2008
(0)
universal healthcare= communism. Taxes=Communism. Hillary=... well, not communism. Also, her beard is way too small. But seriously, none of these things are communism. Also, c*cks.
March 30th, 2008
(0)
serious business according to Matthew38
March 30th, 2008
(-2)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-2)
Universal healthcare is great as long as you don't mind waiting weeks or months for a lot of things.
March 30th, 2008
(-2)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-2)
...and as long as you don't mind sleeping on hospital beds in which the sheets are simply flipped over instead of changed. Right, England?
June 2nd, 2007
(2)
It's true...
June 2nd, 2007
(2)
lol
June 2nd, 2007
(-4)
[ comment (and 16 replies) is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-4)
...and who gives a sh*t if children starve by cutting "entitlement" programs. It is their own fault that they came out of the wrong vagina in the first place. Really man, get out of your desensitizing suburban house and take a look at poverty for what it is. BTW, I thought it has been described as both the debt and deficit?
June 2nd, 2007
(-1)
[ comment (and 5 replies) is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-1)
I am so glad to see that there are more and more true Americans nowadays. They are waking up to the nonsensical bureaucracy.
June 2nd, 2007
(3)
Oversimplifying complex issues is fun.
March 29th, 2008
(-3)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-3)
Tax is a simple issue. The government takes my money so they can spend and redistribute it as they see fit. Personally I don't like my money being taken away against my will to be used on programs I neither use nor agree with. Higher taxes are always bad for me.
March 29th, 2008
(-1)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-1)
^It's funny because you're a minor and you don't even pay taxes. Anyway, I have no pity for the wealthy. They could, and should, be paying 75 percent of their incomes in taxes, and they'd still have more money than anyone on here will ever dare dream of.
March 29th, 2008
(-1)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-1)
It's not your place to decide what other people should do cretin. You are not entitled to other people's money. Take away the self-righteousness and people like you are no different then robbers, pickpockets, and burglars.
March 29th, 2008
(0)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
*sniffle* Poor wealthy people. They're being robbed. Now they can't send their kids to college or pay rent. Whatever will they do?
March 29th, 2008
(-1)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-1)
In a free economy some people have more money than other people. Deal with it or get the f*ck out. Communism's solution to everything is to take money away from the wealthy. Well eventually there's no wealthy people left to steal from and then all the Communist people suffer because their system never created any real wealth, it just kept drawing from the well of the rich. Using the rich people as a whipping boy isn't going to end poverty.
March 29th, 2008
(0)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
You're right, brother. For too long have the tiny, oppressed minority of wealthy people been brutalized by the unwashed masses. It's time to END the tyranny of the majority, to stand up for the rights of the obscenely rich, and to check the masses' audacity to dare want to send their kids to college or have access to medical care. Rise up, wealthy brothers! Your hour is at hand.
March 29th, 2008
(0)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
Is that why you only sponsored this one for $4.55? Because all the rest of your money has been seized and given away to welfare queens? Poor baby.
March 29th, 2008
(2)
"It's not your place to decide what other people should do cretin. You are not entitled to other people's money. Take away the self-righteousness and people like you are no different then robbers, pickpockets, and burglars." - Sure it is, if you're a voting citizen.
March 30th, 2008
(0)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
If you want to be part of society, you need to pay taxes. Leave the country if you don't.
March 30th, 2008
(0)
If you don't believe that society should follow its own constitution and bill of rights, then it is you who should leave. If the current crop of brats have a problem with those documents, then they should change them.
March 30th, 2008
(-1)
if i had to pay 75% of my income in taxes if i became wealthy, wtf did i even bother working to get wealthy?
March 31st, 2008
(0)
Progressive income taxes are straight from the Communist Manifesto. I am not exaggerating. I have a copy in my house.
March 29th, 2008
(-4)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-4)
The Socialists are starting to sound a lot like Christians. Jesus died because of your sins, be righteous and give us your money. The poor died because of your wealth, be liberal and give us your money. My wealth belongs to me not the Church, or the poor, or the government and it will stay that way until I decide to spend it on a legitimate service, which is something neither priests nor politicians provide for me.
March 29th, 2008
(-1)
[ comment (and 5 replies) is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-1)
People so poor they're starving to death are in a minority even smaller than the 'obscenely rich' (I love that term btw, it succinctly captures the Socialist attitude that being wealthy is a sin). The vast majority of people in America have food to eat and shelters to stay in. The majority of people who starve to death in America die from Anorexia or Bulimia. The hard-working poor American who is also starving and homeless is a mythological creature dreamed up by socialist's in order to guilt-trip people.
March 29th, 2008
(-1)
Go away, paulbot.
March 29th, 2008
(-1)
I like socialism
March 30th, 2008
(-1)
I'm sure you'll just LOOOOVE North Korea then.
March 30th, 2008
(3)
9,000,000,000,000 dollars in debt. 42,000 dollars per american. Taxes are good, at least within the next decade. Once we're out of debt we can lower taxes. Now is /not/ the time.
March 30th, 2008
(1)
Out of all the military spending that goes on in the world, 53% of that comes from the US. Coming in second is the UK at 4% and China at 3%.
March 30th, 2008
(2)
if the taxes were actually going towards the debt i wouldn't mind ...
March 31st, 2008
(0)
the taxes don't go anywhere specifically. They go to a single account where appropriations bills take from that. The less appropriations that are passed/less money the administration uses, the more money going to debt. At least this is my understanding.
March 30th, 2008
(0)
Caues you know whats better, to spend and spend without balancing the budget... f*cking retards... Whitehouse is going into foreclosure.
March 30th, 2008
(-2)
I concur. Good day sir!
March 30th, 2008
(0)
i hate politics
March 30th, 2008
(-1)
What you hate is thinking about serious issues.
March 30th, 2008
(2)
You don't want taxes? Fine. Then you don't get roads. Or libraries. Or public schools. Or a well-funded military. Or mail. Or any of the other stuff the government pays for that you take for granted. Do have fun with that.
March 30th, 2008
(0)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
The site is complaining about tax INCREASES, not taxes in general, dumbass.
March 30th, 2008
(2)
That's funny, because you and Matthew seem to be complaining about taxes in general. Tax increases go along with why we need taxes to begin with. It's a part of life in America, sometimes it's necessary. Get used to it.
March 30th, 2008
(-1)
1. I did not make this site. So it's not my message. 2. The tax increases would only be necessary because of the extremely wasteful spending that the president and congress failed to get rid of. 3. Your original statement is entirely incorrect, as well as your second.
March 31st, 2008
(1)
i thought it was more about what the taxes are spent on, not how much i pay
March 31st, 2008
(0)
http://ivoted4nader.ytmnd.com/
April 1st, 2008
(1)
In B4 McCain's Education Funding: Give them Nothing!
April 2nd, 2008
(-1)
If you think throwing more money at our schools will fix our education problem, then you are a part of the problem.
April 2nd, 2008
(0)
not all socilaism is anti-democratic, totalitarian, or even involves the government at all. a person can take care of oneself, and help others simultainiously. its simply of matter of not thinking purely about yourself and consider the needs of the people around you.
April 2nd, 2008
(0)
the difference between a human being and a happyness machine is that a human beings help each other, happyness machines only care about themselves. you dont mind being taxed to death to pay for war debts, or the healthy cut of profit to feed investors, why does it bother you so much that some of what you have to give anyway goes to helping other people?
April 2nd, 2008
(-1)
Consider reading 'Wealth of Nations' by Adam Smith, more specifically, on the concept of how self interest benefits society as a whole.
April 2nd, 2008
(0)
the only power the poor have is their numbers. labor is the use of that power to get a better shake. in a free market thats what happens, people use what they have to get what they want, so really by smashing labor your interupting with that process. one that democratises society, and gives the powerless a fighting chance againts corporate influence.
April 2nd, 2008
(-1)
I think you are drawing strawmen here. Who here said that unions should be crushed?
April 2nd, 2008
(0)
honestly, why not make haliburton pay for the war?
April 2nd, 2008
(-1)
Why have so much war in the first place?
April 2nd, 2008
(0)
i'm not saying that the individual isnt important or that complete and total socialism is the answere, i'm just saying there must be balance between the needs of the individual and those of the group.
April 2nd, 2008
(-1)
A group is merely a bunch of individuals.
April 2nd, 2008
(1)
Your problem is that you think you're talking a balanced approach, but you act as though you believe that anyone who believes that the balance is not where you think it is believes in no balance at all. Which is the position of the extremist, not that of the moderate man.
April 2nd, 2008
(0)
btw the spartans were socialist, and for hundreds of years they were expected by honor to share everything with each other, including slaves
April 2nd, 2008
(-1)
Ah yes, those great Spartans, always starting wars, living under a strict disciplinarian culture of constant battle. Doesn't surprise me that they were socialists. Warmongering and Socialism kinda go hand in hand.
April 3rd, 2008
(0)
Which makes this site even more clever, 'nyuk 'nyuk
April 2nd, 2008
(0)
and you know matthew386, for a galleleon you sure do despise the philosophies of jesus, I mean as a pagan I beleive in the ballance between the individual and the group, but he was all about putting others ahead of oneself in all instances. and taking care of the needy before those who have everything. far to radical for my taste.
April 2nd, 2008
(-1)
pssst... this is SLYPIEGUY's site. Pay more close attention next time.
April 2nd, 2008
(0)
How to think like a Liberal Democrat: "I am against 5% of people controlling 75% of the money. So I want the government to step in. That way, .00005% of the people will control 100% of the money, and life will be fair."
April 6th, 2008
(0)
we can unelect politicians, we can't un-elect an aristocracy, silly-head!
April 6th, 2008
(0)
And the only politicians that ever get "unelected" are the ones that pork their secretaries or men in airport bathrooms.
April 6th, 2008
(0)
and the democrats in 2004. and the republicans in 2006.
April 3rd, 2008
(0)
Oh someone sponsored my site, i was wondering why it was suddenly getting hits lol
April 6th, 2008
(0)
It's too bad Canada's taxes are already like that.
April 6th, 2008
(0)
I lol'd 9 months later.
(1)
There is no such thing as a good government, so long as a government is run by people.
(0)
Also, white chocolate is better for your health than dark.
April 9th, 2008
(0)
Think of how dangerous an idea democracy is. it gives entire control of the government over to the poor as they make up the majority. Madison hated it, and Jefferson loved it. a corporation works in a completely different manner, one in which the future belongs to those who can afford to invest in it. which has its perks. but if you deny the democratic power of the majority, and relly only on wealth, it stops being their country, so they have no reason to fight for it or even give a sh*t. Its not theirs.
April 9th, 2008
(0)
I'm inclined to beleive that we need a kama sutra like harmony where wealth interests and majority interests balance each other out. wealth will, and has crushed or abused democracy to deny public power. they only thing that can possibly stop this the solid and unyeilding pressure of the masses. of course it would help if clinton would stop making freinds with narco-king dictators who like to kill labor organizers. we need labor in the third world if only to slim the huge cost benefits of investing their.
April 9th, 2008
(0)
by labor I mean unions