VOTE RON PAUL 2008!!!
Created on: August 30th, 2007
VOTE RON PAUL 2008!!!
http://youtube.com/watch?v=Pda-rT1sf2M Ron Paul Rules!

Sponsorships:

Vote metrics:

rating total votes favorites comments
(3.24) 802 37 648

View metrics:

today yesterday this week this month all time
2 2 0 0 37,544

Inbound links:

views url
13 http://www.reddit.com/r/Braveryjerk
9 http://www.reddit.com/r/circlejerk/comments/14qjhi/im_a_black_at
7 http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=ytmnd+ron+paul
4 http://www.imdb.com/board/bd0000082/nest/191068773
3 http://www.stumbleupon.com/su/

Add a comment

Please login or register to comment.
<< 1 2 3 >>
September 9th, 2007
(0)
becuase Arab, anti-US agression magically appears out of thin air... I'm SOOOOOOO with you.
September 1st, 2007
(-6)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-6)
*in awe of site content/comments*
September 1st, 2007
(3)
He has my vote!
September 1st, 2007
(-7)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-7)
Wow a low end candidate tries to pander to younger audiences through viral websites. First the Colbert Report now Ytmnd.
September 1st, 2007
(4)
Aw hell, I normally go Democrat, but Ron Paul is too awesome for me to do that this election (Better than Hillary, and not as out there as Obama, and you know he is crazy just from that football ad "I'M READY FOR DA BEARS TO GO ALL DA WAY BABY").
September 1st, 2007
(4)
i dont care what his politics are but this is funny
September 2nd, 2007
(-1)
it takes a back seat to whetstone's sites, but yeah, this is good stuff.
September 3rd, 2007
(-1)
You're a real thinker.
September 3rd, 2007
(0)
still stalking me huh
September 1st, 2007
(-13)
[ comment (and 2 replies) is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-13)
Paul is a dipsh*t, haven't you seen the 2nd debate? The dumbass shot himself in the foot with his retarded comments. He had my vote 100% before he said that stupid sh*t. Ron Paul is a douche and doesn't have a snowballs chance in hell. Who the hell supports Paul after his retarded remarks at the 2nd debate? Are you nuts?
September 1st, 2007
(-10)
[ comment (and 13 replies) is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-10)
It's hilarious how many YouTube and internet zombies fall for Ron Paul's bullsh*t.
September 2nd, 2007
(3)
FALCON PUNCH
September 2nd, 2007
(1)
he's a conservative who likes to smoke weed!
September 10th, 2007
(0)
Supporting legalization is not the same as being a participant. One can support the legal existence of Judaism or Christianity, but not necessarily be Jewish or Christian. Support for legality != Encouragement of Behavior.
September 12th, 2007
(0)
WOOT WEED!
(0)
OPEN THE BORDERS THEN AND NOBODY WILL COME THROUGH AMIRITE
September 2nd, 2007
(-5)
[ comment (and 1 replies) is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-5)
Too perfect. I actually saw an elderly crazy woman yesterday driving an 84 Buick with the bumper spray painted white, with "RON PAUL" stencil painted over it. The guy and his supporters are bat-sh*t crazy.
September 2nd, 2007
(-8)
[ comment (and 3 replies) is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-8)
Vote for Obama. You f*cking idiots.
September 2nd, 2007
(4)
is it possible for a dual-citizenship american-britain 17 year old student to vote from england for this man?
September 2nd, 2007
(5)
um... nope, sorry
September 2nd, 2007
(2)
will you be 18 before nov. 2008?
September 10th, 2007
(0)
Maybe you can see what you can do about drafting Christopher Hitchens as Prime Minister. Either that, or Ozzy.
September 2nd, 2007
(3)
Vote Kucinich!
September 2nd, 2007
(-1)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-1)
Yeah, socialism worked in russia.
September 10th, 2007
(0)
Kucinich has some decent ideas. He and Gravel are perhaps the least imperialist of Democrats. Kucinich is probably one of the better democrats on civil liberties. My problem with him, however, is that he is sold on the notion of central planning. A strong government, in and of itself, might not theoretically be terrible, but there is no guarantee that the next president would not be some vile crook who would look forward to exploiting the system. Kinda like what happened 7 years ago.
September 2nd, 2007
(6)
VOTE KUCINICH!
September 2nd, 2007
(0)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
Yeah, socialism worked in russia. (this page too? oh man, desperation)
September 2nd, 2007
(-5)
[ comment (and 1 replies) is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-5)
The stupidity oozing out of these comments burns my eyes.
September 2nd, 2007
(-3)
this is the internet u f*ckin dumbass
September 2nd, 2007
(-5)
[ comment (and 1 replies) is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-5)
You guys are complete idiots. Anybody sucking up to goverment politics should be shot.
September 2nd, 2007
(-5)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-5)
Libertarians = Suck
September 2nd, 2007
(1)
yay
September 2nd, 2007
(0)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
finally a REAL republican!
September 2nd, 2007
(-5)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-5)
Ron Paul the vote for Coward's!!
September 2nd, 2007
(0)
I'd pound it.
September 2nd, 2007
(-2)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-2)
GET THE F*CK OFF OF YTMND
September 2nd, 2007
(1)
He likes freedom.
September 2nd, 2007
(-1)
[ comment (and 4 replies) is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-1)
i think we've had enough retarded republicans for a while.
September 2nd, 2007
(-3)
[ comment (and 5 replies) is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-3)
He's a f*cking crazy person you retard. Put down your Ayn Rand novel and stop masturbating on the cover.
September 2nd, 2007
(3)
lolol
September 2nd, 2007
(2)
LOL DEAD N*GG*RS AMIRITE?
September 2nd, 2007
(1)
F11!!!!!!!!!!!
September 2nd, 2007
(3)
I'll vote for him since he is going to kick out those wetback anchor babies.
September 2nd, 2007
(-3)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-3)
lol, end the IRS sure sure
September 2nd, 2007
(2)
September 2nd, 2007
(-3)
i dont know who to vote for. this guy or barrack obama
September 2nd, 2007
(-3)
[ comment (and 1 replies) is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-3)
Voted against regulating teh internets Just hoping that "end the war" thing on the right doesn't mean immediate removal of troops from Iraq which would just give terrorists a chance to regroup and take control, again.
September 2nd, 2007
(-1)
btw I know who I support (anything for the internet and net neutrality)
September 2nd, 2007
(-2)
[ comment (and 1 replies) is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-2)
not another republican
September 2nd, 2007
(2)
I guarantee Ron Paul has seen more pussy than ALL OF YOU PROBABLY COMBINED
September 6th, 2007
(1)
but not as much as george zimmer. I GUARANTEE IT
September 2nd, 2007
(2)
end the f*cking irs. libertarians ftw
September 2nd, 2007
(1)
amen brother
September 2nd, 2007
(1)
THAT"S MY MAN of 08!!!!!!
September 2nd, 2007
(-1)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-1)
ron paul sucks ass, but is better than every other republican. meh.
September 2nd, 2007
(1)
Freeeeeeedoooooooooooooooom!!!!!!!!
September 2nd, 2007
(1)
Ron Paul FTW
September 2nd, 2007
(4)
He is anti-abortion but is pro-gun? WTF?
September 2nd, 2007
(2)
He believes individual states should have the right to define their positions on abortion. As a supporter of the second amendment, Paul's stance is that strict federal gun control laws would simply empower black market arms dealers and other criminals while leaving responsible arms owners vulnerable. Cars are dangerous without proper educational training programs and testing for licenses. Would it make more sense for us to ban cars or to increase awareness on responsible usage through better training?
September 2nd, 2007
(2)
It's the same with the drug war. Should we waste our money and police power arresting drug users ( which only fuels black market demand, higher prices, and attracts criminals).. OR should we improve education, harm-reduction programs, rehabilitation, and work at the source of the problem (the populace themselves) with the belief that people have the power to lead healthy, independent lives when raised properly?
September 2nd, 2007
(2)
lol, roq for president
September 2nd, 2007
(0)
"Cars are dangerous without proper educational training programs and testing for licenses. Would it make more sense for us to ban cars or to increase awareness on responsible usage through better training?" Holy sh*t. Roq just made an argument for gun control. BTW, gun control isn't the same as gun prohibition (as in the banning of gun all together). Also, does the right to bare arms mean I can bare any arm that I want to, such as nuclear "arms", Comanche attack choppers, and Abrams tanks?
September 2nd, 2007
(0)
What I am trying to get at with the above comment is that the right to bare arms is the right to "freedom of arms," as much as the Wayne-Pierres of the world like to interpret it that way.
September 2nd, 2007
(0)
I mean isn't, not is.
September 2nd, 2007
(-3)
What type of weapons should be legal to the common man? Good question. I'm thinking nuclear and biological devices are off limits (sorry guys) as are rocket launchers, German panzerfausts, tommy guns and other automatics. The possible exception being zombie invasions, when above weapons may be handed out by the national guard.
September 2nd, 2007
(-4)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-4)
I think semi-automatic hand guns would be sufficient enough for protection.
September 2nd, 2007
(3)
I'm not fazed by any of the debate going on. My vote is still going to Lyndon LaRouche.
September 2nd, 2007
(2)
VOTE RICK ASTLEY 2008
September 2nd, 2007
(2)
Dennis Kucinich .
September 2nd, 2007
(0)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
DENNIS BERGKAMP!
September 2nd, 2007
(-5)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-5)
Hooray for delusional hypocrite socialists! Good luck with that "department of peace" or whatever the f*ck that idiot proposed.
September 2nd, 2007
(2)
omgz ron paul is in top viewed... so I (we) did it! best $14.26 I ever spent
September 2nd, 2007
(-5)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-5)
Ron Paul is a small gopher. Because of that he is not eligible to become President. The same thing happened back in the day when Ross Perot was revealed to be a meerkat.
September 2nd, 2007
(1)
If you don't vote Ron Paul you are one of three things: Socialist, Neocon, or Ignorant.
September 2nd, 2007
(-1)
Yeah, because we know that all non-laissez faire capitalist are "socialist."
September 2nd, 2007
(1)
also: http://clearlythebestcandidate.ytmnd.com/
September 2nd, 2007
(-3)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-3)
you're a bunch of idiots
September 2nd, 2007
(1)
for the republic
September 2nd, 2007
(0)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
leader bonus activated
September 2nd, 2007
(2)
ron paul rocks, 5'd
September 2nd, 2007
(0)
3'd.
September 2nd, 2007
(-2)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-2)
"end the IRS" lol lies
September 2nd, 2007
(0)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
No.
September 2nd, 2007
(2)
Why is everyone on the internets exploding over this guy? Some of his policies are OK, I don't agree with some though. I'm not a big politics guy though.
September 2nd, 2007
(-2)
[ comment (and 2 replies) is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-2)
I wish you libertarians would shut up about this guy. He's not going to get the nomination. If he was president, the US would go into a major economic depression and civil war will destroy your c*ntry.
September 2nd, 2007
(-1)
go away
September 2nd, 2007
(-3)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-3)
Better than the COON Obama. OBama should be president of the plantation slaves or house n*gg*rs because that is what he is. He's a n*gg*r with a degree. He still has the flappy lips, he still probably wants to rape white women. NO N*GG*RS!!
September 2nd, 2007
(0)
[ comment (and 4 replies) is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
Ron paul is like that sweet-hearted grandpa you had seated in the living room recliner, who calls the mailman "colored" and always told you how the world would be better if it was his fathers generation in charge. AKA he's a documented racist with unrealistic and anachronistic economic ideals as well as no chance. Although he's still better than any other "conservative" in government.
September 2nd, 2007
(-1)
lol @ sponsership
September 2nd, 2007
(-3)
[ comment (and 2 replies) is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-3)
Ron Paul sucks. Barack Obama ftw.
September 2nd, 2007
(1)
I like. hes got my vote. even though he did before hand =)
September 2nd, 2007
(-2)
vote Pr0n Haul 2008!
September 2nd, 2007
(0)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
It is green
September 2nd, 2007
(7)
This is the best internet fad since Snakes on a Plane!
September 2nd, 2007
(5)
And much like that box office bomb, no one in the real world gives a sh*t.
September 2nd, 2007
(4)
most correct comment ever.
September 2nd, 2007
(0)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
The only non-Socialist or non-Neocon in the entire election. freedom and liberty, ftw.
September 2nd, 2007
(4)
Vote MTown 2008. I'll do everything that Ron Paul does, PLUS give everybody in America a cookie! TWO cookies if you vote for me.
September 10th, 2007
(0)
Now you sound like a democrat.
September 2nd, 2007
(-2)
September 2nd, 2007
(-5)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-5)
VOTE MITT ROMNEY!!!!!!!!!!!
September 2nd, 2007
(1)
Lose the IRS? Goodness, that is a feat. If he legalizes it, i'm in!
September 2nd, 2007
(-1)
Eh, I'm for some of his policies and against others. But he makes some claims that are out of the range of the executive branch.
September 2nd, 2007
(0)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
Another Republican from Texas? I'm not falling for that sh*t again.
September 2nd, 2007
(-4)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-4)
a pro-life politician is automatically a fool. eff that noise.
September 2nd, 2007
(-1)
I would honestly rather vote for Larouche the douche then this guy.
September 2nd, 2007
(0)
[ comment (and 1 replies) is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
wow, why don't we just elect a rat's *ss to be president, because I bet it's never voted to raise taxes either.
September 2nd, 2007
(0)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
He looks cool
September 2nd, 2007
(-2)
[ comment (and 4 replies) is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-2)
this YTMND can't be serious...
September 2nd, 2007
(-1)
1 for bringing god into the whitehouse
September 2nd, 2007
(-1)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-1)
Only an *ssh*le named social democracy would make such ignorant comments.
September 2nd, 2007
(1)
3 4 s0ng
September 2nd, 2007
(4)
Ron Paul has delivered more than 4000 babies.
September 3rd, 2007
(1)
He held down the "D" button for continuous delivering.
September 2nd, 2007
(1)
LICE TO WIN !!! YEAAHHHHH!!! LIVVEEE !!!! YEAHHHH !!!! WINNNN !!!! 5/5
September 3rd, 2007
(1)
yay lice
September 2nd, 2007
(1)
Yes Please!
September 2nd, 2007
(1)
ron paul ftw
September 2nd, 2007
(1)
"ron paul has delivered over 4000 babies." classic
September 2nd, 2007
(0)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
political propoganda is fail
September 2nd, 2007
(1)
** i step away from the mic to press F11 for full screen. Also, f*ck Ron Paul.
September 3rd, 2007
(0)
[ comment (and 1 replies) is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
So it begins the sh*t storm to end all sh*t storms VOAT x here then the comments get filled with pseudo intellects and blah blah blah just make it stop I just want my funny dammit
September 3rd, 2007
(-1)
Vote Mudkip 2008
September 3rd, 2007
(-1)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-1)
Whoever voted 5 and sponsored this should get a freakin life.
September 3rd, 2007
(-1)
Vote David DUke
September 3rd, 2007
(1)
Well, being as every other candidate is either scary (Thompson, Romney, McCain), unnecessarily fake (Hilary) or unqualified (Guiliani, Edwards), I will go as far and say Ron Paul has my vote.
September 3rd, 2007
(-1)
Even Ron Paul n00bs should know that self-respecting Americans NEVER shop at Walmart...
September 3rd, 2007
(-1)
How about... no.
September 3rd, 2007
(-1)
Elimating the IRS will _NOT_ mean that Americans stop paying taxes. The FairTax organization quotes a 24% additional tax on all retail goods and services. They got this number by taking all consumption (private and public), which totals about $11.2 trillion, subtracting the estimated prebate for all Americans, about $2.2 trillion, and figuring the tax rate needed to fund the current federal budget, about $2.3 trillion (source: http://www.fairtax.org/PDF/TaxingSalesUnderFairTax.pdf).
September 3rd, 2007
(-1)
From what I have read thus far (admittedly, I have not read the entire white paper, though I have read the meat and bones of the FairTax Book), this _does NOT_ account for the probable reduction in consumer spending that will occur, when people realize that they can save all their money and avoid taxes. Now, their arguement is that investment will create an economic firestorm, and this could very well be true. But what happens during those first few years?
September 3rd, 2007
(-1)
Perhaps people's habits will be too slow to change, and they'll continue spending every dime they earn (the average savings rate for Americans is 1.8% of income, a stat I got from The Economist's 2007 Pocket World in Figures). But if not, the federal government could come up with some pretty serious shortfalls, which it will have to finance with even more bonds, driving interest rates up higher and crowding out even more borrowers.
September 3rd, 2007
(-1)
If we're really going to get serious about being fiscally responsible, then we'll have to start increasing taxes or cutting spending even more to cover our national debt and restore a positive current account balance. But where will we cut spending? Eliminating funding for Iraq saves us $200 billion a year, sure. But that's less than 10% of the federal budget. That gain will be more than made up for in the next decade as baby boomers start demanding social security benefits.
September 3rd, 2007
(-1)
The Fair Tax Book says that we have $73 trillion in social security liabilities as of right now. We could easily be talking about having to pay another $1 trillion a year in benefits a decade from now. _This is more than our entire current defense budget._ It would take a politican with titanium balls the size of boulders to seriously suggest that we ought to end social security cold turkey. My grandmother recieves about 75% of her income from social security. What will she, and many others, do?
September 3rd, 2007
(-1)
It would take me too long to make the larger point, so I'll state it without proof: There is NO candidate in this election who is a panacea for our country's ills. There's no silver bullet, no magic cure for our tax system or our budget. Each system has its flaws (and boy, does the income tax system ever have its flaws). We will ALL have to think a little harder about the arugements the candidates are making and cut through the bullsh*t in order to find the right, best candidate
September 3rd, 2007
(-1)
Also, c*cks.
September 3rd, 2007
(4)
Throwing around numbers and multiple topics definitely makes you look smart. How about this, go find out why our forefathers fought the american revolution. Then look at the Federal Reserve Act, and try say Ron Paul isn't the only man for the job. How many other candidates will eliminate the Federal Reserve? Do you even understand how fractional reserve banking works? You can harp on about any topic you would like, but this is FIRST and FOREMOST the most important topic. Feel free to blow our last chance
September 3rd, 2007
(0)
Contrary to popular belief, in a country with a strong banking system, the central bank is not the only entity that causes inflation. When banks lend out demand deposits, they also "create" money. http://www.newyorkfed.org/aboutthefed/fedpoint/fed45.html Or if you don't trust the Federal Reserve, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reserve_requirement Now, this is not the primary tool for guiding monetary policy, as playing around with the reserve requirement would get lots of bankers incredibly pissed.
September 3rd, 2007
(0)
But over the long term, it can be influenced to control monetary policy. Without this regulation, some banks would try to lend more than the 90% of their demand deposits, further inflating the money supply. The idea behind the arguement to end the Fed, that is that inflation is damaging to the economy, I fully support. I wish the Fed would grow some bigger balls and let the economy recede every one in awhile instead of injecting liquidity every time some idiot investor scrapes his knees.
September 3rd, 2007
(0)
But an independent central bank is a key part of any modern capitalist government. Saying that the Fed should be wiped out is extreme, and to me, it even smacks of Mercantilism. Besides, if you're that worried about inflation, you are still free to go and buy some gold on the market, if you wish.
September 3rd, 2007
(0)
By the way, the average British bank only has about 3.1% of its demand deposits retained. If we rid our banks of the reserve requirement, our banks could shift to this value, further increasing the money supply.
September 24th, 2007
(0)
I hate the irs but fair tax would be worse.
September 3rd, 2007
(2)
4, because the song makes him look badass. truthfully, i wanted to 1 it.
September 3rd, 2007
(-2)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-2)
epic phail
September 3rd, 2007
(0)
[ comment (and 8 replies) is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
I hate how naive people are.....raising taxes isn't always a bad thing, taxes pay for highways, law enforcement, schools, you know the everyday things
September 3rd, 2007
(-4)
[ comment (and 2 replies) is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-4)
I saw Ron Paul on one of the debates. He was like a little, retarded baby.
September 3rd, 2007
(4)
VOTE PACARD 2008
September 3rd, 2007
(1)
Now there's a ticket I can get behind!
September 3rd, 2007
(-1)
nice song still tho ... NO.
September 3rd, 2007
(-2)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-2)
Probably the best site ever.
September 3rd, 2007
(1)
5 for Jack Fields. F*CK YEAH JACK FIELDS!
September 3rd, 2007
(1)
Ron Paul.... he has two first names...
September 3rd, 2007
(8)
Be careful, if this YTMND gets on a Ron Paul forum, we have another "howtoprankatelemarketer"
September 4th, 2007
(1)
No motherf#ckin' sh*t.
September 3rd, 2007
(1)
lol, the ignorance in here is amazing. No wonder the country keeps heading down the sh*tter, a majority of the citizens are f*cking idiots. As Bill Maher said to Ron Paul, "If the average American were smarter, wouldn't you be leading the country?"
September 4th, 2007
(1)
The problem with that is that Bill Maher is a f*cking idiot.
September 3rd, 2007
(-1)
no more Reganomics
September 3rd, 2007
(4)
Castro has my vote, sorry
September 10th, 2007
(0)
Then move to Cuba.
September 3rd, 2007
(0)
3'd?
September 3rd, 2007
(-3)
I hate to 4 this, but my OCD kicked in
September 3rd, 2007
(0)
Well this seems out of place. Still the guy doesn't seem too bad. But it wont matter the government will elect who it wants not what the people wants. Just like last time ugh....
September 3rd, 2007
(-3)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-3)
Ron Paul=F*ggot
September 3rd, 2007
(-2)
sounds great!
September 3rd, 2007
(-2)
Ron Paul for president, Dennis Kucinich for vice president.
September 3rd, 2007
(-1)
they're so different in ideology but paul said he liked kucnich
September 3rd, 2007
(-3)
[ comment (and 2 replies) is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-3)
GTFO MY YTMND, SERIOUS POLITICS. Besides, Ron Paul is just another lying *ssh*le like all other politicians.
September 3rd, 2007
(4)
5 for the sweet sweet debate this has spawned
September 4th, 2007
(1)
VOAT FOR KHAN IN 1996 TO END THE EUGENICS WARS
September 4th, 2007
(2)
We can agree: whoever wins, WE LOSE.
September 4th, 2007
(-1)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-1)
Not if Ron Paul is elected. Good DAY, sir.
September 4th, 2007
(0)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
political ytmnd...... no
September 4th, 2007
(1)
4, solely for the music.
September 4th, 2007
(0)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
-1 for the Ford Explorer clone.
September 4th, 2007
(-1)
does anyone even realize he's not really a republican and is really a libertarian? Ok some of you probably do, but all these little 15 year olds probably don't
September 4th, 2007
(-1)
I don't think that's a marker so much as Ayn Rand's demoness seed.
September 4th, 2007
(0)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
ron paul is the sh*t
September 4th, 2007
(0)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
RALPH NADER!
September 4th, 2007
(0)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
I vote for Ross Perot every year. He's a real winner.
September 4th, 2007
(-2)
[ comment (and 1 replies) is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-2)
Obama rules. Although this guy isn't bad either.
September 4th, 2007
(-3)
ATTN sponsor, why not send your money to Ron Paul, instead of creating an ad on a website for people who can't or won't vote?
September 4th, 2007
(0)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
Because the sponsorships are used to gain the awareness of a large number of people so they can finally awaken to the truth this man brings. A few Federal Reserve fiat notes to ytmnd can't hurt us. It's vital for people to inform themselves, and to know that they have a candidate who cares about the people.
October 3rd, 2007
(1)
What makes you think that people on this site can't vote? I vote in every election. Even though I know my one vote makes no difference because of the current electoral system, I believe that if you don't vote, than you have no right to complain about the government or politics.
September 4th, 2007
(0)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
Fif'd
September 4th, 2007
(-1)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-1)
Ron Paul is the best presidential candidate we've had in... who remembers? Obama is CFR trash. The only way this country can see some REAL change is if Ron Paul is elected. Otherwise we'll be seeing a re-run of the Bush debacle, no matter who is in office. The Democrats will f*ck this country up through Socialism. The Neo-Con Republicans will do it through war and fear mongering. I urge all of you sheep to break through the submissive mindset and see the f*cking truth.
September 4th, 2007
(-2)
[ comment (and 4 replies) is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-2)
A vote for pulling out of Iraq is a vote for the next Darfur.
September 4th, 2007
(1)
AUSTIN, TX -- A Ron Paul supporter collapsed from exhaustion after spending 36 hours straight on the Internet, posting pro-Paul comments on various blogs, repeatedly viewing videos to pad the stats of the Ron Paul YouTube channel, and stuffing the virtual ballot boxes of numerous online presidential polls.
September 4th, 2007
(1)
29 year old Jeremy Ditmunder of Austin, Texas is listed in stable condition, suffering from extreme exhaustion, dehydration, and carpal tunnel syndrome. He is expected to make a complete recovery, but his absence from the Paul campaign is going to be felt. The only two other known Ron Paul supporters, Wendy Staples and Barbara Milligan, could not be reached for comment, as they themselves were busy posting on the web to maintain the illusion of broad support for Paul.
December 15th, 2007
(0)
LOL, stupid paul-B0TS... ^_^
<< 1 2 3 >>