ClownPuncher's profile

August 25th, 2005
November 11th, 2009
Made Average Rating
394 -2.43
Total Created Average Score
20 (3.90) 
Made Received
$0.00 $0.00

recent activity

when activity
ClownPuncher has no recent activity.

most recent sites

title views votes rating creation
?Angst 556 5 (2.60)  2009-11-11
?SOMA HOLIDAY 601 6 (1.67)  2009-05-18
?Pill Poppin Animals 553 5 (2.20)  2009-05-12
?Pills for Thrills 470 7 (2.00)  2009-05-09
?Dr-Pizza is the man now dog 1,667 34 (3.85)  2006-08-23

highest rated sites

title views votes rating creation
?Sweet MS Paint Graphics 13,252 467 (4.08)  2006-01-24
?Jackie Chan has ONE weakness 41,712 355 (4.02)  2005-12-30
?YTMND Radio (Animated, with NEDM) 24,907 594 (4.00)  2006-06-25
?Bauman stole my YTMND 21,445 621 (3.99)  2006-07-21
?Blue Ball Factory: Tree Machine UPDATED! 17,329 178 (3.99)  2005-11-11

recent comments

November 11th, 2009
On on the site ?Angst
ah, i see your point, and it's a mighty good one too, but you must realize that even for the time they were made, I still did not find the sites to be quite creative. I did not just downvote them a half hour ago; it was at least a few months or so. If i changed my vote for some reason i'm sorry I cannot remember why, but i can assure you that I did not hold their value up to the standards of how "well varnished" and "creative" sites were back then vs now.
November 11th, 2009
On on the site ?Angst
I'm sorry if it offends you but what do you mean taken out of context. also, this is the first time i logged on in months so i downvoted those a while ago.
November 11th, 2009
On on the site ?Angst
(0)
I just didn't think they were that creative :(
November 11th, 2009
On on the site ?pigs
pink floyd!
November 11th, 2009
On on the site ?Angst
(0)
lol yeah i understand it's very annoying but that's the entire intention :P And if you want to judge something based solely on how much work was put into it, that's fine. I just think if a site meets the intended point in a witty or creative fashion it should get a descent vote.