Eric‑Starnes' profile

November 21st, 2005
February 14th, 2007
Made Average Rating
100 0.50
Total Created Average Score
10 (3.52) 
Made Received
$5.23 $0.00

recent activity

when activity
Eric-Starnes has no recent activity.

most recent sites

title views votes rating creation
?Google finds best day ever(now with bunnies) 2,984 29 (3.62)  2006-06-23
?Google finds best day ever 1,179 25 (3.56)  2006-06-23
?test page 427 5 (1.80)  2006-06-23
?There's no easy way out 806 30 (3.70)  2006-03-07
?Fox News: Really really balanced 2,294 77 (3.82)  2006-02-28

highest rated sites

title views votes rating creation
?Shocking Human-animal hybrid 1,524 28 (3.96)  2006-02-04
?Fox News: Really really balanced 2,294 77 (3.82)  2006-02-28
?There's no easy way out 806 30 (3.70)  2006-03-07
?Feminist group infiltrated 1,121 29 (3.66)  2006-01-04
?Google finds best day ever(now with bunnies) 2,984 29 (3.62)  2006-06-23

recent comments

October 5th, 2006
You are a hopeless individual
October 4th, 2006
If i believed you were sincere and if this was almost any other site then YTMND i would 5 this, since it is somthing that deserves to be discussed. However YTMND is possibly the worst place to try to discuss such things and you are obviously not sincere, therefore: 1
October 4th, 2006
Pointing to the vastness of the universe to support moral nihilism is the ethical equilivent of dividing by zero. You can stomp your feet and shout that my ethical decisions are equilivent to religious faith all you want but that does not make it true. Demanding meaningfulness on the scale of the universe to justify human scale ethics may be convienent for your rhetorical purposes, but it is not reasonable. For additional information see: Utilitarianism.
October 3rd, 2006
I didnt think it was possible, but this is more tedious and less meaningful then Cries of the Infidels.
September 27th, 2006
I get it :)