Currently viewing  
 
Kacen's profile:

Last Online:Today 18:29
Member Since:2006-03-09

Sponsorships this user has made:$0.00 ($0.00 in fees)
Sponsorships their sites have received:$49.89 ($2.11 in fees)

 Kacen's most recent sites:
Title Views Votes Rating
?  Babylon 519319
(3.89)
?  orh878
(3.75)
?  Command & Conquer is an overblown pile of s...20613
(3.92)
?  Munching & Snacking34121
(4.00)
?  Country and Western Music31923
(4.00)

 Kacen's highest rated sites:
Title Views Votes Rating
?  Save him, hes drowning!10,187781
(4.34)
?  BattleGuppers©6,112184
(4.29)
?  ToastZapperz©7,973261
(4.27)
?  FrogWHOAAAS3,853153
(4.25)
?  BIG SKRIN TEVEEZTA1,65398
(4.22)

 Kacen's most recent comments:
Site When Comment
2009-11-08 04:50:08
 
Pedophelia
+0 [replies: 0]
2009-11-06 22:08:41
 
That was a giraffe? I literally kept stopping that part in the trailer to see what it was, but it was too dark. I first thought it was the statue of liberty.
+3 [replies: 1]
2009-10-31 14:36:12
 
That's funny because I changed nothing.
+0 [replies: 0]
2009-10-29 06:07:22
 
If anything the fact that a CIA office was in WTC7 just points to it not being an inside job since the CIA is one of the big bogeymen in all your conspiracy theories. http://www.debunking911.com/ Look through this site.
+1 [replies: 0]
2009-10-29 03:44:11
 
So when you conspiracy theorists say "IT LOOKED LIKE A DEMOLITION, THAT'S NOT HOW A BUILDING WOULD FALL IF HIT BY PLANES", you lack a frame of reference to compare it to with the latter "point". It's just like when moon landing deniers (who should be f*cking executed as far as I'm concerned), say the moon walk looked "fake". Compared to what? What's your frame of reference? I admit to hypocrisy a bit though, I myself am a Holocaust denier. Too much sh*t about the holocaust doesn't bode well with me...
+0 [replies: 0]