MadamPurse's profile

June 4th, 2006
March 24th, 2017
Made Average Rating
192 1.22
Total Created Average Score
7 (3.78) 
Made Received
$0.00 $0.00

recent activity

when activity
March 24th, 2017 MadamPurse viewed ?When Effort Dies.
March 24th, 2017 MadamPurse viewed ?Low budget Ted Kennedy Biography.
March 24th, 2017 MadamPurse viewed ?Air Katsopolis.
March 24th, 2017 MadamPurse viewed ?(nsfw) Fuckin' Flies!.
March 24th, 2017 MadamPurse viewed ?(O_O) foof.

most recent sites

title views votes rating creation
?I spelled Eric Bauman Wrong =( 1,357 41 (3.12)  2006-08-16
?PTKFGS: 5 Star Project (Now 100% Work Safe!) 5,382 394 (3.95)  2006-08-16
?My damn test site 626 8 (3.00)  2006-08-15
?YTMND Radio has moved!!! 823 10 (2.50)  2006-07-31
?What's classier than Ernest? 1,747 15 (3.67)  2006-07-11

highest rated sites

title views votes rating creation
?PTKFGS: 5 Star Project (Now 100% Work Safe!) 5,382 394 (3.95)  2006-08-16
?What's classier than Ernest? 1,747 15 (3.67)  2006-07-11
?Cosby Busts ... 739 11 (3.18)  2006-06-21
?I spelled Eric Bauman Wrong =( 1,357 41 (3.12)  2006-08-16
?My damn test site 626 8 (3.00)  2006-08-15

recent comments

October 9th, 2009
Give me minuses!
October 5th, 2009
damnit I was about to DarthWang this but then it turned out to be 5
October 5th, 2009
By the way, KelvinPlanck, it's called a Clausius Device.
October 5th, 2009
Q(h) + Q(c) = 0; S = -Q(h)/T(h) - Q(c)/T(c); since Q(h) = -Q(c) = Q we can say S = Q[1/T(h) - 1/T(c)]; 1/T(h) < 1/T(c) and Q is positive so there would need to be a reduction in entropy, which we ALL know can't happen. Oh and by the way, the right answer was "c*cks"