Currently viewing  
 
Texaggie79's profile:

Last Online:Today 16:21
Member Since:2005-12-21

Sponsorships this user has made:$19.18 ($1.82 in fees)
Sponsorships their sites have received:$63.68 ($5.22 in fees)

 Texaggie79's most recent sites:
Title Views Votes Rating
?  Tech Bell Ringer Gets Busy3,11056
(3.68)
?  Now that Lando Has His License2,72093
(3.69)
?  My Life Be Like....1,23763
(3.03)
?  Kelly Clarkson Loses a Fan2,49190
(3.06)
?  To whom it may concern (refresh)2,49999
(2.95)

 Texaggie79's highest rated sites:
Title Views Votes Rating
?  Why Quantum Physics is Cool Pt 1 (Updated with ...79,4922,030
(4.49)
?  Why Quantum Physics is Cool Pt 2 (Updated with ...29,808959
(4.41)
?  Why Quantum Physics is Cool Pt 3 (Updated Pt 4 ...20,943519
(4.18)
?  Why Quantum Physics is Cool Pt. 4 (Big DL)31,274809
(4.15)
?  Let's Touch Ling (FireFox Only)13,340360
(4.12)

 Texaggie79's most recent comments:
Site When Comment
2009-11-14 13:33:23
 
Don't think we can ever know really. I mean, we basically taint any data that we get, since we, as humans can comprehend it. Kinda like the ole' trees in a forest falling and no one hearing.
+0 [replies: 0]
2009-11-11 08:46:10
 
The "detection" is actually by magnet type devices that put spin on the particle, and the spin is then detected on the final detection film. A different direction of spin for each slit.
+0 [replies: 0]
2009-11-09 19:23:23
 
If it is possible to know the path, then you will never see an interference pattern. Only if the pattern isn't and can never be known.
+0 [replies: 0]
2009-10-11 20:53:50
 
This is exactly why Glenn Beck = win and I still listen to him.
+3 [replies: 1]
2009-09-02 08:28:12
 
In other words "I have no valid argument other than touchy feely emotions, so I will just retreat in defeat."
+0 [replies: 0]