Currently viewing  
 
bobmario2's profile:

Last Online:April 15
Member Since:2006-01-16

Sponsorships this user has made:$0.00 ($0.00 in fees)
Sponsorships their sites have received:$0.00 ($0.00 in fees)

 bobmario2's most recent sites:
Title Views Votes Rating
?  -1=1 ??63220
(2.85)
?  Nostalgia Inducing1,46686
(3.93)
?  The Tetris Trance1,5607
(3.57)
?  The real Hobbes.3212
(1.00)
?  Truly, words of wisdom.2215
(3.20)

 bobmario2's highest rated sites:
Title Views Votes Rating
?  (nsfw) Puberty: What NOT to do.25,396362
(4.01)
?  Nostalgia Inducing1,46686
(3.93)
?  The Tetris Trance1,5607
(3.57)
?  Nebraska rappers are hard core1,00110
(3.40)
?  Conan stares into the pits of hell92815
(3.20)

 bobmario2's most recent comments:
Site When Comment
2006-12-10 11:16:12
 
Yup. A screen-shot YTMND with stolen sound. Completely unoriginal. But I had to inform the world somehow.
+0 [replies: 0]
2006-11-12 21:45:53
 
win
+0 [replies: 0]
2006-11-12 18:45:12
 
I'm pretty sure I know it's impossible....but still interesting. Considering that I explained exactly why the statement is impossible above, which has nothing to do with your reasoning, I suggest that YOU take algebra again, and maybe you will realize that equations with imaginary units are infact possible.
+0 [replies: 0]
2006-11-12 18:25:29
 
Nope, nothing to do with absolute values. Nice try, though.
+0 [replies: 0]
2006-11-12 18:22:57
 
Actually, the logical fallacy has nothing to do with the plus/minus sign. If you want to know where the fallacy is, it lies in that when you multiply two square roots, you get the square root of the two variables under the radical sign [e.g. the square root of (a) times the square root of (b) equals the square root of (ab)] This law only applies to positive real numbers, wherein lies the fallacy.
+0 [replies: 0]