Currently viewing  
 
deputymarshall's profile:

Last Online:December 2007
Member Since:2005-05-29

Sponsorships this user has made:$0.00 ($0.00 in fees)
Sponsorships their sites have received:$0.00 ($0.00 in fees)

 deputymarshall's most recent sites:
Title Views Votes Rating
?  Are you there, God?9367
(3.43)
?  Beating a Dead Horse6,91118
(3.28)
?  (nsfw) Eugene Levy reforms Brian Peppers4,20750
(3.50)
?  Journey > Jesus3,03222
(3.36)
?  Come make spaghetti with me!7769
(3.22)

 deputymarshall's highest rated sites:
Title Views Votes Rating
?  Hulk Hogan goes CRAZY23,781214
(3.90)
?  COME AND GET IT!69010
(3.70)
?  Nixon exacts vengeance from the grave!3,05446
(3.65)
?  HIME DA MOUNTIE!1,74225
(3.64)
?  He's George Takei, damnit!1,81627
(3.63)

 deputymarshall's most recent comments:
Site When Comment
2006-10-08 02:03:34
 
You get two stars for using a Sagan quote, but the YTMND itself is long and pretty dull. Also, as a general critique that's certainly not directed solely at you - YTMND shouldn't be used as a blog or message board post. I miss when people on this site were just trying to make other people laugh instead of contributing to the vast chasm of pointless debate (overflowing with logical fallacies) that's so prevalent on the internet these days. And, yes, I'm an atheist myself.
+0 [replies: 0]
2006-10-08 01:45:16
 
SO cool.
+0 [replies: 0]
2006-10-08 01:42:36
 
Very well done.
+0 [replies: 0]
2006-10-08 01:37:21
 
1 for a pretty unentertaining YTMND regardless of the argument being presented and any potential merits said argument might have. Actually, rating the argument itself, it gets a 1 for being based wholly on an erroneous assumption (secular and athest aren't mutually inclusive) and confusing correlation and causation.
+0 [replies: 0]
2006-09-07 00:03:28
 
Wunderbar!
+0 [replies: 0]