duketime's profile
June 4th, 2006
| Made | Average Rating |
|---|---|
| 4 | 0.00 |
| Total Created | Average Score |
|---|---|
| 0 | (0.00) |
| Made | Received |
|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 |
recent activity
| when | activity |
|---|---|
| duketime has no recent activity. | |
most recent sites
| title | views | votes | rating | creation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| duketime has no sites ( ._.) | ||||
highest rated sites
| title | views | votes | rating | creation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| duketime has no sites ( ._.) | ||||
recent comments
duketime
September 9th, 2006
9:10:03 PM CDT
On on the site ?Vending Machines Are Dangerous!
Is the sound completely original or a mashup of other music?
On on the site ?Why God Exists (Updated with Q and A at the end)
Also, be careful using the word "proof". "Proof" has a burden of evidence upon it, and you think you can irrefutably prove something in a 5-minute ytmnd that the world's and history's best thinker, scientists, and philosophers haven't been able to in all of history? You can say "provide evidence" or "make your argument" but overstating your proof invalidates this.
Lose.
On on the site ?Why God Exists (Updated with Q and A at the end)
You try to fit God into this Framework you've created, but you specifically exempt God from the central rule of your framework.
The Universe (or set of all "things"), you've "proven" must have had a cause (due to the Law of Causality) and God could be that first cause. But in making this statement you do one of two things.
1) fit God into your framework but exempting it from the Law of Causality, and degrading the integrity of your law (why you are allowed to do this is never justified).
2) allow yourself to pull God out of the framework of things affected by the Law of Causality, but restrict that exception to God only. This makes your law weak enough that it leaves us to wonder why the Universe doesn't have this ability.