Currently viewing  
 
flamingspinach's profile:

Last Online:April 10
Member Since:2005-12-24

Sponsorships this user has made:$0.00 ($0.00 in fees)
Sponsorships their sites have received:$0.00 ($0.00 in fees)

 flamingspinach's most recent sites:
Title Views Votes Rating
?  africa mexico sicily tijuana india osaka indonesia1,11917
(2.59)
?  OMG, Secret Nazi DDR Strategy !!5418
(2.50)

 flamingspinach's highest rated sites:
Title Views Votes Rating
?  africa mexico sicily tijuana india osaka indonesia1,11917
(2.59)
?  OMG, Secret Nazi DDR Strategy !!5418
(2.50)

 flamingspinach's most recent comments:
Site When Comment
2009-03-24 11:34:52
 
In case anyone is wondering, source is http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x44lh2
+0 [replies: 0]
?  ))D8
2007-01-18 13:17:46
 
ps lol citruschild looks like some alien from star wars (with a really washed out palette :o)
+0 [replies: 0]
?  ))D8
2007-01-18 13:16:43
 
dis sh*t needs some labeling
+0 [replies: 0]
?  moogy
2007-01-18 13:07:26
 
o
+0 [replies: 0]
2006-09-30 04:58:54
 
I highly suggest you drop Aquinas's argument and stick with Godel's - http://www.stats.uwaterloo.ca/~cgsmall/ontology.html for details. I'm an atheist, but unlike most of the dumbasses around here, I actually am familiar with both this "proof" of God's existence and most others as well. Godel's ontological argument is the only one I've seen that's remotely convincing, and this is mainly because he clearly defines everything he is talking about, and makes clear what we are assuming. Check it out.
+0 [replies: 0]