Currently viewing  
 
iwpoe's profile:

Last Online:June 14
Member Since:2006-03-05

Sponsorships this user has made:$105.99 ($4.71 in fees)
Sponsorships their sites have received:$57.74 ($2.96 in fees)

 iwpoe's most recent sites:
Title Views Votes Rating
?  Things That Make You Go "Hmm"47312
(3.58)
?  (nsfw) I'm Giving Santa A Peek-At-You3552
(3.00)
?  Samuel Jackson Addresses Eric Bauman1,29758
(3.64)
?  Nietzsche Moves Me5579
(3.00)
?  Subliminally gay Dragon Ball Z song (Revised)31,351589
(3.72)

 iwpoe's highest rated sites:
Title Views Votes Rating
?  Coca-Cola is Black Yall2,07424
(3.88)
?  OMG, Secret Nazi Hillary Clinton !!3,62541
(3.78)
?  Skin care with Picard4584
(3.75)
?  Subliminally gay Dragon Ball Z song (Revised)31,351589
(3.72)
?  lol Immanuel Kant (line fixed)24,254613
(3.71)

 iwpoe's most recent comments:
Site When Comment
2009-06-01 08:58:30
 
I approve of the image, but indeed, it does need better music.
+0 [replies: 0]
2009-06-01 08:56:27
 
"I think they were kind of opposed, as Russell was (at least later) a nominalist." Really? How do you mean? That term has a long and varied history in philosophy.
+1 [replies: 0]
2009-05-05 09:37:05
 
Well, they were opposed in the sense that Gödel's theorem undermines the entire project of the Principia Mathematica which was to be the crowning jewel of Russell and Whitehead's work on the foundations of mathematics. I don't know what Russell thought after Gödel showed him to be wrong. I mean, I suppose they agreed in that Russell realized that he was wrong.
+1 [replies: 0]
2009-05-05 09:17:37
 
No two against one match Whitehead and Russell vs. Gödel. You could also do Heidegger vs. Husserl, though their disagreement is more on the level of semantics and not mathematics (both reject the mathematicization of logic - Heidegger initially on the ground that the employment of the concept of function obscures the meaning and meaning changes of judgments).
+1 [replies: 10]
2008-10-31 02:08:17
 
I'm confused.
+0 [replies: 0]