Xenophon reports "Socrates is guilty of crime in refusing to recognize the gods acknowledged by the state, and importing strange divinities of his own; he is further guilty of corrupting the young."

+0

We are not Perez Hilton's sh*t hole. We're Syncan's sh*t hole! End this site.

+1

It's just very fast English. Only 'asked,' 'what's,' and 'getting' show significant shifts in dialect. I'll translate: "I asked her what's her problem because I had some on, and she told me I could[correction] I'm still not getting in because I didn't have any undergarments on."

-3

Not really- his exit means nothing for their ultimate economic or political situation unless the transfer of power results in a systemic collapse.

+2

Design on a fundamental level, is connected with the attempt to produce the "right effect" either sensually or otherwise. Your first example is certainly the sort of thing we would only be willing to attribute to design while your second is an object of design (engaged in by the Pringles factory daily). In addition, I never claimed that we are actually seeing design. No, we never see the property of design itself. I claimed that we experience the appearance of design whose truth is contingent upon a designer and- if it is to be anything more than a contingent product of human judgment -must be proven aside from the appearance.

+0