noooo‑oo‑oo's profile
December 15th, 2005
| Made | Average Rating |
|---|---|
| 60 | -1.00 |
| Total Created | Average Score |
|---|---|
| 1 | (3.17) |
| Made | Received |
|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 |
recent activity
| when | activity |
|---|---|
| November 12th, 2010 | noooo-oo-oo viewed ? I LVOE U BABY. |
| November 12th, 2010 | noooo-oo-oo viewed ? NEDM: Revelations. |
| November 12th, 2010 | noooo-oo-oo viewed ? cat picture to rule all cat pictures. |
| November 12th, 2010 | noooo-oo-oo viewed ? Look, in the sky, chief!. |
| November 12th, 2010 | noooo-oo-oo viewed ? NEDM (Update also Original). |
most recent sites
| title | views | votes | rating | creation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ?I called the front seat | 1,402 | 6 | (3.17) | 2006-03-09 |
highest rated sites
| title | views | votes | rating | creation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ?I called the front seat | 1,402 | 6 | (3.17) | 2006-03-09 |
recent comments
noooo-oo-oo
October 30th, 2006
2:52:41 AM CST
On on the site ?Luke's Birthday Party
I almost 1'd it because it was just so slow...maybe that's the effect you're trying to achieve, it might be my comp (though the music worked just fine), but it just took forever, so maybe that explains it.
On on the site ?A Feature Requesst: Anti-Sponsorship
You don't even have to get random sites, you can give to ones already up there to push the ones you don't like a bit lower. What's more is this compounds itself productively when other people upvote sites to cover the ones you used to cover. People already have to worry about people going over the top of them anyway, so there's no added risk factor.
On on the site ?A Feature Requesst: Anti-Sponsorship
^Yeah, what he said. You can just make whatever money they did irrelevant by just pushing them off the list. It comes with its own aspect ratio - if someone puts up 5 for the 9th spot, you can put up $10.02 ($5.01 twice) to push 2 other sites up and over it.