I give a 2. Not a 1 because you stand up for your beliefs but far from a 5 because you put down others for theirs. Agnostics claim that for something to be so, there must be undeniable truth. During the 17th century, spontaneous generation was accepted as science. Those who had "proof" believed moldy grain spawned rats, muddy soil spawned frogs, etc. etc. It wasn't until the 19th century that this scientific "fact" was debunked. So to think that you know what is and isn't based purely on what you can prove, is to be just as ignorant as those who believed in spontaneous generation. Just because we can't prove the existence of something doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Likewise, just because you can't prove God doesn't exist, doesn't necessarily mean He does.

-1

NEDM

+0

not a typical ytmnd...but as a die hard Pink Floyd / Roger Waters fan...I love it.

+0