Legislation not guaranteed
Created on: May 21st, 2007
Legislation not guaranteed

Sponsorships:

Vote metrics:

rating total votes favorites comments
(3.79) 29 0 14

View metrics:

today yesterday this week this month all time
0 0 0 0 934

Inbound links:

views url
No one has linked to this site. ( ._.)

Add a comment

Please login or register to comment.
May 21st, 2007
(-1)
RONPAULTMND
May 21st, 2007
(-1)
I love it. Too bad he won't make it very far in the primaries. :(
May 21st, 2007
(-1)
huzzah, I say!
May 21st, 2007
(0)
Under Dr Paul, we would have a great republic once again. However, it probably wouldn't last too long since the Islamo fascists would have free reign in the world and over Israel.
July 26th, 2007
(0)
the next person to say "Islamofascists" gets killed. By the way, the French invented that word.
July 26th, 2007
(0)
also, Israel was middle-eastern and mostly islamic before it was created... the UN needed to check itself on that one. May have been a bad idea to do that. Also, he wants to overturn Roe v. Wade. How's that for small government? I know you're the house conservative here on the internet, but that term means nothing anymore. It means "keep the government off my money and on everything else" rather than "keep the government the f*ck off me". The Republican party is a religious group now rather than a party.
July 26th, 2007
(0)
also, the concept of a great republic is inherently flawed by the elected status of reps in America. they just need to get elected and they can do whatever they want. It's a manipulative and flawed system, which (like all other systems) needs some sort of change at base level. And PS: the middle east is no f*cking threat to us at all and you know it. The closest is Iran. They might become a problem, but everyone knows if nuclear weapons are ever used again, there sure as hell won't be a third time...
July 26th, 2007
(0)
so that acts as a good deterrant.
May 23rd, 2007
(-2)
a five for you, sir
May 23rd, 2007
(-2)
fifed
September 15th, 2007
(-2)
You sir are a f*cking winner.
September 15th, 2007
(-2)
F*cking brilliant sir.
December 16th, 2007
(1)
John Edwards believes in pulling out of IRAQ, but without the negative trade offs. NEGATIVES you will have to deal with: Ron Paul does not value equal rights for minorities. R P would deny women control of their bodies and reproductive rights. R P would be disastrous for the working class. abolishing minimum wage. R Pís policies would cause damage to our already strained environment. R P would butcher our already sad educational system. R P is opposed to the separation of church and state.
December 16th, 2007
(1)
Ron Paul is a racist! Scroll down this link for proof. http://www.stormfront.org/forum/