SHATNER IS KIRK (new edition)
Created on: October 16th, 2007
SHATNER IS KIRK (new edition)
Updated version of the original :)

Sponsorships:

Vote metrics:

rating total votes favorites comments
(4.06) 367 29 77

View metrics:

today yesterday this week this month all time
0 0 0 0 15,265

Inbound links:

views url
18 https://www.google.com/
5 http://www.baidu.com/s?wd=YTMND-SHATNERISKIRK(newedition
3 http://lookathisbutt.blogspot.com/2007_11_01_archive.html
3 http://netcomber.com
3 https://www.facebook.com/
Citations:
?SHATNER IS KIRK by ottervomit
User: ottervomit

Add a comment

Please login or register to comment.
October 16th, 2007
(2)
awesome.
October 16th, 2007
(1)
kassius! a 5? i expected better from you
October 17th, 2007
(1)
His girlfriend must be surfing on his account again....
October 17th, 2007
(3)
Anyway.... 1) not putting the original url in your image and sound origin equals trying to pull a fast one. 2 ) even if you cited correctly, it's still ottervomits site with a frame replaced. 3) The original Shatner is Kirk ytmnd was featured in an article in the Washington Post for crying out loud. here's the article--- http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/29/AR2006072900041.html
October 17th, 2007
(-1)
Where can I put the citation in?
October 17th, 2007
(-1)
Ok, I only inserted a citation to shatneriskirk.ytmnd.com but did not cite ottervomit. Fixed that :)
October 17th, 2007
(-2)
the guy copied the same citation's ottervomit used in his original - i'm glad nobody even considered he might not know what the proper citation would be, but instead assumed that he was trying to "pull a fast one". also: the one frame he replaced made the piece timely, which is sometimes enough to equal funny.
October 17th, 2007
(2)
Asterios, that would be the correct citation if you assembled this gif yourself. In this case the correct citation would be the URL of the original site. Put the URL in the image & sound origin and tada... you have a corrct citation!
October 17th, 2007
(0)
artorious? http://artorius.ytmnd.com/
October 17th, 2007
(-1)
money-hat: did you read my earlier comment at all? i didn't say he'd made the correct citation, but i think it was out of ignorance, not malice. you're the one who claimed that he was "trying to pull a fast one".
October 17th, 2007
(1)
so why is the origional's address still not in the image citation?
October 16th, 2007
(-1)
lol'd
October 16th, 2007
(-1)
yes.
October 16th, 2007
(-1)
9 straight 5's
October 16th, 2007
(2)
http://ninetimes.ytmnd.com/
October 16th, 2007
(2)
needs preloader
October 16th, 2007
(0)
agreed bad sync without
October 16th, 2007
(1)
I can tell you put a lot of hard work into this.
October 16th, 2007
(1)
holy eyeliner!
October 16th, 2007
(0)
HA!
October 16th, 2007
(-2)
meh
October 16th, 2007
(-1)
omfg how could you?!??!?!
October 16th, 2007
(-2)
:care:
October 16th, 2007
(0)
Put the Price is Right fail sound in, he'll five it.
October 16th, 2007
(1)
Damn right he is!
October 16th, 2007
(4)
this is the exact same thing as the original. almost nothing is different about it. fail
October 16th, 2007
(1)
What keaton said.
October 17th, 2007
(2)
Would you believe it if the Washington Post featured the original in it's pages???? Cause it did---- http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/29/AR2006072900041.html
October 16th, 2007
(1)
there's almost nothing different from the original, stop recycling.
October 16th, 2007
(-1)
epic awesomeness!
October 16th, 2007
(-1)
ahahahah
October 16th, 2007
(-1)
Of course all I did was to take the site and changed two minor things. That's why I called it "UPDATED" >_<
October 16th, 2007
(2)
MAY-B U WILL GIT ON THE TV, LIKE OTTER.
October 16th, 2007
(-1)
October 16th, 2007
(0)
PRICELINE NEGOTIATOR!
October 16th, 2007
(-1)
Thank you for updating that.
October 16th, 2007
(-1)
rofl, funny as hell.
October 16th, 2007
(1)
Y'know, considering how many casting rumors are out there involving that movie, as well as just the general screwed-up-ness of it, I wouldn't doubt that in the end they use a stunt double and Photoshop old-school Kirk's head onto the new one's body.
October 16th, 2007
(0)
I think the best part is the "shatner is kirk" text and how it pops up on the screen just like it would in the old series, completely not synchronized with the music.
October 16th, 2007
(1)
Ottervomit made the original, he has intertube rights to the remake.
October 18th, 2007
(-3)
but not to the update
October 16th, 2007
(-1)
lol, eye makeup
October 16th, 2007
(1)
I didn't hear any New Edition at all
October 16th, 2007
(-1)
Why did he always wear mascara in this series?
October 16th, 2007
(1)
MAY LOCUSTS AND RABID RETARDED COW BABIES CONSUME YOUR FLESH FOR STEALING FROM OTTERVOMIT
October 17th, 2007
(-4)
[ comment (and 2 replies) is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-4)
uh, the guy called it an update.
October 17th, 2007
(-4)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-4)
trek sh*t.
October 17th, 2007
(0)
Way to steal ottervomit's site. :o/
October 17th, 2007
(0)
THERE CAN BE ONLY ONE
October 17th, 2007
(3)
I had considered making an update to SHATNER IS KIRK but I didn't want to recycle the same site. I was perusing my DVD's (albeit halfheartedly because, well, I've been in a creative slump for a LONG while now) for new footage to pull and do a Chris Pine version. Now I don't have to!
October 17th, 2007
(0)
You didn't add an explosion noise to it :(
October 17th, 2007
(2)
Otter, put Chris Pine in the Christopher Pike Life Support Chair, as Kirk sadly wheels him away (from the end of Menagirie PartII) Only trekkies will get it, but whatever...
October 17th, 2007
(1)
Oh and for the record, I have no ill-will towards this site or its creator.
October 17th, 2007
(1)
That makes one of us. I shot a man once just for snoring.
October 17th, 2007
(0)
40+ years of history.. ah, f*ck it. JJ can do better. Way to wipe your *ss with tradition Paramount.
October 17th, 2007
(0)
icwutudidthar
October 17th, 2007
(0)
how can you ruin the sync? all you did was put a new picture on the screen
October 17th, 2007
(0)
then why did you give this a 3? this cant deserve more than a 1
October 17th, 2007
(2)
You just replaced the image on the screen
October 18th, 2007
(-1)
There was no room for improvement, it was already perfect - with the exception of those two frames :)
October 17th, 2007
(0)
i f*cking laaaawlt.....
October 17th, 2007
(0)
Not funny, what were you thinking?
October 17th, 2007
(0)
awesome-y time!
October 17th, 2007
(1)
EXACTCOPYTMND
October 17th, 2007
(0)
nice explosion noise, oh wait...
October 17th, 2007
(0)
*insert text here*
October 17th, 2007
(1)
rip-off. already done.
October 17th, 2007
(0)
Please replace "updated" with "ripped off".
October 17th, 2007
(0)
October 17th, 2007
(0)
I remember this quite clearly
October 18th, 2007
(0)
fail :(
October 18th, 2007
(0)
Nice! 8 stars. everyonehaseights.ytmnd.com
October 24th, 2007
(0)
ripped
November 26th, 2007
(0)
Fail.
December 9th, 2008
(0)
Nicely done! (and a Sowell fan!)