Created on: July 12th, 2010

Created By:

Domain:

sobrightsovivid.ytmnd.com

Description:

Double Rainbow?!?! Oh My God!! It's a double rainbow, damn, all the way across the sky. Sources: Double Rainbow Guy: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQSNhk5ICTI Schmoyoho Double Rainbow Autotune Song: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MX0D4oZwCsA

Foreground Origin:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQSNhk5ICTI

Sound Origin:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MX0D4oZwCsA

Keywords:

Double

Rainbow

DoubleRainbow

OMG

Full On Double Rainbow

Autotune

Song

Sponsorships:

user	amount	user	amount
No one has sponsored this site ( ._.)
Sponsor this site!		Total: $0.00	Active: $0.00

Vote metrics:

rating	total votes	favorites	comments
(4)	21	4	17

View metrics:

today	yesterday	this week	this month	all time
0	0	3	6	2,174

Inbound links:

views	url
35	http://www.google.com
7	http://twitter.com/
1	http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&client=firefox-a&hs=Wci&rls=o
1	http://home.myspace.com/Modules/WebIM/Pages/Conversation.aspx?fid=539678138&v=11
1	http://www.google.com/search?um=1&hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&q=double%20rainbow%20ytmnd&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=iw

Add a comment

Richtext is ON
Bold
Italic
Underline
Code
User Link
Site Link

Please login or register to comment.

0 of 2000 characters used.

Notify me if anyone replies

Gachpafanasky

July 12th, 2010

4:30:17 AM CDT

(0)

Hahahaha! Epic

d1ggitydan

July 12th, 2010

8:44:14 AM CDT

(0)

double fag. I meant five.

LegoLewdite

July 12th, 2010

10:52:43 AM CDT

(0)

this song cracks me so consistently up.

LegoLewdite

July 12th, 2010

11:15:59 AM CDT

(0)

also, true story: last Friday there was a double rainbow visible from the bar. everyone was flipping out, no one got the reference.

magicbeaverpelt

July 12th, 2010

11:22:50 AM CDT

(0)

It's full on!

Richdog89

July 12th, 2010

12:11:14 PM CDT

(0)

Damn you beat me to this. But you did it better than i could have

skearn41

July 12th, 2010

1:40:55 PM CDT

(0)

it means rainbow stalin decided to clone himself.

psychofishhead

July 12th, 2010

2:02:45 PM CDT

(0)

i love it when people point out that they stole something in the sources. saves me a lot of trouble

ExcitedNinja

July 12th, 2010

5:20:20 PM CDT

(0)

Last I checked, stealing someones work involved claiming you made it when you did not. Giving credit to those that created something is hardly stealing.

Calm down man, just a medium of sharing this beautiful song, and this beautiful double rainbow!!

psychofishhead

July 12th, 2010

8:00:14 PM CDT

(0)

so by that logic, I can go ahead and take the mona lisa but as long as I don't claim it as my own, its not stealing?

Also I love how everybody on the internet automatically assumes you're mad if you raise any sort of criticism. Hurray for a medium that doesn't allow you to project emotion!

6 replies hidden

ExcitedNinja

July 12th, 2010

8:57:11 PM CDT

(0)

No, by that logic, if you wanted to create a YTMND with the Mona Lisa in it, then no one should really accuse you of stealing it if you credit da Vinci.

And there is such a thing as tones in writing. The way you typed the message came out angry. ;)

psychofishhead

July 13th, 2010

8:02:49 AM CDT

(0)

Ok, while you're technically not plagiarizing anything, you aren't using the source to do something original. I could fill a paper with only excerpts from other sources but that would be terrible and bring nothing new to the table.

Anyway, my point is that this isn't digg. Don't just repost Re: Re: Re: Fwd: Re: Check out this fune vid! emails you get from your dad.

Also there's is absolutely nothing angry in my writing. I'm just tired of seeing direct rips from other places of the internet without adding anything.

ExcitedNinja

July 13th, 2010

2:25:10 PM CDT

(0)

Well, there was the time and effort spent in editing the audio as well as creating the gif from the sources.

I could argue that adding a picture of a cat on top of meat-spin with an mp3 from a video game is terrible and brings nothing new to the table as well.

Anyway, my point is, I didn't merely just digg something. I created a YTMND just like many others. I also don't feel as though dropping an annoying image on top of it, or adding annoying noises to the song, would have benefited the YTMND.

We can go around in circles about this for a week, but I'll agree to disagree.

psychofishhead

July 13th, 2010

3:38:38 PM CDT

(0)

Seriously? Are you honestly trying to pull that pansy "agree to disagree" bull crap? What's the point of arguing if you're just going to fold after like 5 posts of text.

What sort of effort did you put in the audio other than maybe cutting out some of it. The same goes for the gif as well because I honestly can't think of anything you could of done to this that would count as "effort" because this looks exactly like the youtube video . You're either being disingenuous for the sake of your argument or you're terrible at ripping stuff straight out of youtube.

Go ahead and argue that my cat site is terrible, I'm not going to hold it against you. You'd probably completely miss the point but whatever.

So anyway, point out how this is something more substantial than a digg link and I'll probably leave you alone.

ExcitedNinja

July 14th, 2010

2:43:09 AM CDT

(0)

Let me rephrase then. I do not feel that either of us are capable of telling the other anything new to progress the argument in a different direction.

I merely answered your comment because you were not clear on what you meant. If you do not feel my submission is creative nor original, that's actually perfectly okay with me. I respect your opinion in that regard.

psychofishhead

July 14th, 2010

1:44:32 PM CDT

(0)

Very well. At least you defended yourself better and in a more civil manner than some of the people here. Even though we don't have similar tastes, I can at least recognize that you conducted yourself like a decent person when your site was criticized.

Lastimero

July 14th, 2010

9:52:40 PM CDT

(0)

^Good discussion. I'll still stick with originality and creativity, but I see both sides of the argument a lot better now.