I'll make the music if you want. It's really simple, and I can show you some things I've done in boredom of the same concept. That's supposing you're not working on it as we speak, that is.
Interesting how the new Sonic is going back to similar shading and lighting techniques used in the first and second games. As in not "My face is covered in grease".
I could easily ask you the same question. "Not if the person doing it doesn't think it's wrong"? That would mean you're valuing one person's opinion more than another's, which violates your entire theory.
(cont'd) people from doing what they want, so at that point it just becomes a battle between what's the worst of the two evils. Not to mention that Hitler also brainwashed millions of his own people to believe what he did, but that's beside the point. Basically, "right" is what you make it, wrong is stopping others from achieving what they percieve as right.
But I am talking about principle. The principle is that by enslaving that race, you've left them devoid of the ability to...say, do the same thing to another race. So, no, there is no "right", I'm not here to contest that point. Right is what you, either as an individual or a society, make it. But there is most certainly a wrong. The only wrong is to keep others from fulfilling what they define as right. So by that theory, yes, stopping Hitler would be wrong. But Hitler would have been wrong to stop other
(cont'd) you. It's not a question of "How does X make you feel" or "What do you think about Y". It's simply that we only are what we know. And all we know is Earth. And we're all stuck here on Earth. So again I ask, why is one person's action or opinion more valuable than another's?
Again, it's only "right" or "good" if it doesn't infringe upon other peoples' right to do what they want as well. Because why are your (that's a general "your"; not talking specificially about you) actions any more important than someone else's? Doesn't that contradict your (that's a specific "your") entire theory? And I don't mean "How would you feel if the child you shot killed you instead?", I mean that by killing said child, you have taken away his freedom the same way he'd take away yours if he'd shot
I think the idea is that it's okay to do whatever you want so long as it doesn't keep someone else from doing what they want, too. So killing someone is wrong because it keeps someone else from living. Most people would be willing to bet that that person wanted to do something with their life other than dying.
And to the comment claiming this is existentialism, it's not. It's nihilism. Existentialism states that we exist, but we are not given a purpose. We, individually, have to give life purpose.
You know, I really do love the Wii. But if you want to get nitpicky, some of the lighting effects on the are pretty subpar (particularly the streetlight). I'll be buying one regardless of the graphics, though.
shudmeyer's recent comments: