lol Immanuel Kant (line fixed)
Created on: May 31st, 2006
lol Immanuel Kant (line fixed)
lol idealism (thats a blurry Königsberg, East Prussia in the back. If you don't get it more info can be found here "en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kant" & here "en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critique_of_Pure_Reason#The_Transcendental_Deduction";

Sponsorships:

Vote metrics:

rating total votes favorites comments
(3.72) 599 17 177

View metrics:

today yesterday this week this month all time
0 0 0 0 26,255

Inbound links:

views url
3 http://friendsinyourhead.com/forum/viewtopic.php?id=1522
2 https://www.google.com/
1 http://www.google.com.br/search?hl=pt-BR&source=hp&q=kantline&meta=&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai
1 http://www.google.com.au/search?rlz=1C1CHKB_enAU417AU417&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=lolkant
1 http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=kant+ytmnd&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&client=firefox-a&rlz=1R1GGGL_en___GB344

Add a comment

Please login or register to comment.
May 31st, 2006
(0)
err: the indian referance is elaborated upon here "web.utk.edu/~mperry8/kantjoke.html"
May 31st, 2006
(0)
kant downvote that :)
(0)
It's good, except you misspelled "Transcendental"
May 31st, 2006
(0)
Ak! Thanks
May 31st, 2006
(0)
Fixed
May 31st, 2006
(0)
This is made of Win and (my personal) Philosphical God. Kant =
May 31st, 2006
(0)
fix loop
May 31st, 2006
(0)
"fix loop" It's done that way on purpose to mimic the scrolling background of old cartoons.
May 31st, 2006
(0)
I don't know why I like this so much. But I do. 5'd
May 31st, 2006
(0)
f*ck philo
May 31st, 2006
(0)
lol jpeg87 was born in 1987 and is too young to understand teh pure win!
May 31st, 2006
(0)
It's like pizza and ice cream, the two things aren't any funnier when you combine them. 2'd for effort.
May 31st, 2006
(0)
One day I'm going to make a "Kant Stops the Rock" YTMND.
May 31st, 2006
(0)
LAWL, indians.
May 31st, 2006
(0)
kant is a f*g
May 31st, 2006
(0)
I love being blissfully ignorant to history, thus, not getting this.
May 31st, 2006
(0)
I still don't get it! /wrist
May 31st, 2006
(0)
Obviously the downvoters never finished high-school.
May 31st, 2006
(0)
GOD i hated that philosophy of religion course =/
(0)
learn something studying for finals?
May 31st, 2006
(0)
Image does not work correctly
May 31st, 2006
(0)
"I still don't get it! /wrist" The Transcendental Deduction is one of Kant's most important works where he affirms the value of the sensory in relation to reason. The Indian part is in reference to an awful joke made by Kant in "Critique of Judgment" that he propped up as some sort of exemplar of humor.
May 31st, 2006
(0)
Always liked Kant....
May 31st, 2006
(0)
"Image does not work correctly" That's a client side problem, not mine. Fix your computer before down voting me.
May 31st, 2006
(0)
"learn something studying for finals?" - No I studied Kant independent of my philosophy classes. I reason if a philosophy major wont pay me then I might want to at least enrich my mind out of the process.
May 31st, 2006
(0)
lol @ academic humor.
May 31st, 2006
(0)
Possibly, but he does make for a good, if not very dry, read.
June 1st, 2006
(0)
iwpoe, GTFO. You're too smart for us YTMNDers :P and +1 for explaining it again to me :D
June 1st, 2006
(0)
you just kant think that way...
June 1st, 2006
(0)
I have another “lol philosophy” one prepared, but not for tonight.
June 1st, 2006
(0)
The most immoral man in history. Try Rand instead.
June 1st, 2006
(0)
forgot to vote. sorry.
June 1st, 2006
(0)
Immanuel Kant? Oh yes he can!
June 1st, 2006
(0)
"Try Rand instead" - Too bad her and "her collective" are piss poor philosophers and haven’t maintained a coherent stance, even in their critiques of others, in 72 years.
June 1st, 2006
(0)
lol, you lack maturity your guardian sux
June 1st, 2006
(0)
Immanuel Kant was a real pissant who was very rarely stable.
June 1st, 2006
(0)
lulz. You should check out marriedtothesea dot com
June 1st, 2006
(0)
Rand rules
June 1st, 2006
(0)
2 for making me remember history... this blows..
June 1st, 2006
(0)
"You should check out marriedtothesea dot com" - Why thank you; it's actually funnier than I expected from a random YTMND comment.
June 1st, 2006
(0)
+5 for kant
June 1st, 2006
(0)
Yeah, but does he run Linux?
June 1st, 2006
(0)
I kept laughing for no reason.
(0)
5'd only and purely for bringing some Kant into things
June 1st, 2006
(0)
"Yeah, but does he run Linux?" - Arudius, and only if it it is compatable with The Refutation of Idealism.
June 1st, 2006
(0)
Nope, checked it. The looping backround image is a literal pain for my eyes since the boundaries are so bold. If you could make the backround image blend better, I'd vote higher.
June 1st, 2006
(0)
"Nope, checked it." - Fixed just for you, sir.
June 1st, 2006
(0)
haha. i love philosophy ytmnds
June 1st, 2006
(0)
Good jorb. I really don't see how knowing Kant through studying for finals or side reading makes a big difference, and I hate it when people browbeat like that.
June 1st, 2006
(0)
5'd for philosophy. The categorical imperative requires no less. It can be universalized as a law applying to all mankind that YTMNDs of such overwhelming brilliance must be 5'd for great justice.
June 1st, 2006
(0)
"I couldn't remember which philosopher" - Rather obscure but after looking it up, the Philosopher's Walk in Kyoto, Japan was named for Nishida Kitaro who used to walk the path to meditate.
June 1st, 2006
(0)
"5'd for philosophy." - Thanks to you, sir, and to the remainder who have complimented me thus far.
June 1st, 2006
(0)
filosophy is a waste of time
June 1st, 2006
(0)
"filosophy[sic] is a waste of time" - As was, apparently, your education.
June 1st, 2006
(0)
Wow good ytmnd, I really am a fan of the categorical imperative which was the main tenet of kants moral theory. it is a good rule to live by, with the exception of the barbaric absolutism that may follow from it.
June 1st, 2006
(0)
""filosophy[sic] is a waste of time" - As was, apparently, your education." Such ownage turns a 3 to a 5 in seconds.
June 1st, 2006
(0)
love the classics
June 1st, 2006
(0)
Kants theory is basically deontological, in that it rests on the notion of duty. The arguement is that we should adhere our lives to a strict sense of duty to the moral law. HEDONIC CALCULUS FTW
June 1st, 2006
(0)
"Kants theory is basically deontological" - This is more or less true of all moral theories except those theories that abandon moral codes all together such as Nietzsche's work. Until a theory so compelling as to force man to follow it is formulated all moral code is a matter of duty.
June 1st, 2006
(0)
I would have rather liked "lol, hegel" or "lol, heidegger" but this is good too
June 1st, 2006
(0)
lol, kant!
June 1st, 2006
(0)
"I would have rather liked 'lol, hegel'" - Though I like Hegel I chose Kant because he's a more famous name to those who may have only taken introductory Philosophy and because I had the "also Indians" reference that would be funny to someone who didn't know a thing about Kant. I should do a “lol Death of Socrates” YTMND some time later.
June 1st, 2006
(0)
lol 1d
June 1st, 2006
(0)
Is the YTMND community so uneducated that we upvote anything remotley intellectual? This isn't funny, creative, or really anything but yet another dumb "lol" site.
June 1st, 2006
(0)
"Is the YTMND community" - You're on a meme website. What did you expect? No repetition? The structure of this domain is constructed entirely for the propagation and creation of repetitive variations on central meme forms which, though important, are, by necessity, rare. If you want “originality” go to deviant art, plenty of "original" crap to look at there.
June 1st, 2006
(0)
^ TRU DAT.
June 1st, 2006
(0)
I hate Kant so much...
June 1st, 2006
(0)
"I hate Kant so much..." If it makes you feel any better, he's quite dead.
June 1st, 2006
(0)
next up, "lol Gödel" plz! logic is the best part of phil
June 1st, 2006
(0)
lol! grabbing anything you can and stuffing it in a lol fad.
June 1st, 2006
(0)
That is the idea unless the original Ronald McDonald had some sort of inherent quality about his character that screamed "lol, internet".
June 1st, 2006
(0)
meh
June 1st, 2006
(0)
Immanuel Kant was a real pissant who was very rarely stable... continue the song, someone.
June 1st, 2006
(0)
haha
June 1st, 2006
(0)
Ok i'll continue: Heidegger, Heidegger was a boozy beggar Who could think you under the table...
June 1st, 2006
(0)
No matter if that image thing was on purpose or not, i still dont like it...
June 1st, 2006
(0)
satire, irony, & monkey piss
June 1st, 2006
(0)
winwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwin
June 1st, 2006
(0)
haha you fixed loop +1
June 1st, 2006
(0)
W00.
June 1st, 2006
(0)
lol kant
June 1st, 2006
(0)
Kant is full of OCD and lose. He WISHED he was Descartes.
June 1st, 2006
(0)
"He WISHED he was Descartes." - No one wishes they were Descartes. He's a groundwork philosopher long superseded by later philosophers.
June 1st, 2006
(0)
Listen, I read a great deal of philosophy, and even I found this to be mediocre at best. While providing relevant links is certainly helpful, you have to understand that most people won’t take the time to investigate them, except perhaps to confirm that such things actually exist. In addition, it appears you have some insatiable need to respond at length to every meaningless comment and intellectualize the befuddled musings of twelve year olds.
June 1st, 2006
(0)
I realize it likely stems from a genuine desire to educate and enlighten, but it just comes off as pompous and masturbatory. Basically, the site itself is devoid of meaningful content and your attempts at contextualizing the information make it clumsy and ineffective. Creative works are not simply machines by which information is disseminated.
June 1st, 2006
(0)
LMFAO!!!
June 1st, 2006
(0)
Not funny.
June 1st, 2006
(0)
pretentious psuedo-intellectual garbage
June 1st, 2006
(0)
changed my vote becuase you're being a dick and using superfluous language
June 1st, 2006
(0)
lol, oned.
June 1st, 2006
(0)
Philosophy ftw!
(0)
you made me google this. And I got a song out of it. I still don't get it. 5 for making me feel stupid.
(0)
http://www.auburn.edu/academic/liberal_arts/philosophy/kant.htm
June 1st, 2006
(0)
...I think zer0hue just pwned you..lol, fighting over the internet
June 1st, 2006
(0)
Emanuel Kant was a real pissant
June 1st, 2006
(0)
June 1st, 2006
(0)
kant was an *sshole, and he was f*cking ignorant.
June 1st, 2006
(0)
lol, kingdom of ends
(0)
no zer0hue, his intention was to be pompus and masturbatory all along. Psuedo-intellectuals and the internets go hand-in-hand, they think obscure references make them smart. It just so happens that I learned about this guy in Psych class, however the name previously escaped me until I recognized a familiar website we used in class to read about him. And now I remember what he did and this ytmnd makes very little sense. So no need to get involved in any spirited discussion with the creator of this site.
June 1st, 2006
(0)
Lol, categorical imperative. Kant rules.
(0)
at least, the ytmnd has little to do with Kant's life's work. Now this site seems hopelessly random if not esoteric.
(0)
some people take ytmnd too seriously, lighten up and laugh for once...
June 1st, 2006
(0)
I actually got that. :P
June 1st, 2006
(0)
philosophy ftfw (for the f*cking win)
June 1st, 2006
(0)
"Listen, I read a great deal of philosophy" - Perhaps you're right, at least on the point of comment reply. I had been awake for too long and replying to comments was something to do; I didn't consider audience reception. I apologize if I've insulted anyone. As for the humor of the site itself I found it a humorous enough idea to go forward with and received some initial positive responses when I first tested it. It's clear enough that some find it funny; that is my audience.
June 1st, 2006
(0)
wow, intellectual masturbation. Be careful so you don't get skeeted on!
June 1st, 2006
(0)
"his intention was to be pompus and masturbatory all along" - No, my intention was to better learn gif animation and to pass my time after being awake for over 24 hours. If you wanted to understand it I've provided (and I grant that the method is clumsy) 3 links for that purpose and a brief explanation in a comment. The sites esoteric nature is fully acknowledged and its randomness is inherent to the "lol internet" form.
June 1st, 2006
(0)
In appreciation of zer0hue's critique I'll now limit all further comments to serious and direct questions.
June 1st, 2006
(0)
stop trying to appear smart.
June 1st, 2006
(0)
Haha, nice.
(0)
http://shezlemonparty.ytmnd.com/ http://shezlemonparty.ytmnd.com/ http://shezlemonparty.ytmnd.com/ http://shezlemonparty.ytmnd.com/ http://shezlemonparty.ytmnd.com/ http://shezlemonparty.ytmnd.com/
June 1st, 2006
(0)
:) Sweet.
June 1st, 2006
(0)
Education ftw
June 1st, 2006
(0)
also... cocks?
June 1st, 2006
(0)
5'd for reference to 6th grade literature homework. You must have an education
June 1st, 2006
(0)
Going on in the minds of several ytmnders: "If I 5 this, people will think I'm smart/educated". Too bad I can't give you a 4.5 =P
June 1st, 2006
(0)
Where's the categorical imperative?Or logical contradictions? Or his formulations? Or a kingdom of ends?
June 1st, 2006
(0)
My history book translates Kant's famous quote as "Have to courage to utilize your knowedge to it's fullest extent". I hate that particular history book. Oh, and 4'd for being an intellegent parody.
June 1st, 2006
(0)
Immanuel Kant was a real pissant. He was very rarely stable.
June 1st, 2006
(0)
lol, walden
June 1st, 2006
(0)
oh wait walden was written by enry david theroe. my bad
June 1st, 2006
(0)
lol, Overused fad.
June 1st, 2006
(0)
5'd cuz i don't get it at all.
June 1st, 2006
(0)
5'd for Kantean humor. I love how iwpoe responds to every single downvoter.
June 1st, 2006
(0)
more like immanuel CANT, lol, get it...hahah, jk...5'd
June 1st, 2006
(0)
Yes,I know who he is but I didn't like this ytmnd. Sorry.
June 1st, 2006
(0)
i just realized that the farther away you are from that song the faster it goes
June 1st, 2006
(0)
there are 3 fundamental truths. kant is cool, majoring in philosophy is a joke, and this ytmnd sucks
June 1st, 2006
(0)
huzzah! educated persons unite!
June 1st, 2006
(0)
Like him or not, Hegel was enormously influential.
June 1st, 2006
(0)
Isnt it Transcedental thought and Objectivity of experience? well, considering that, now that you made it people are commenting you on this. Therefore if you didnt make it, none of us would be experiencing this nor even thinking about it. o_0
June 1st, 2006
(0)
people who chastise hegel usually have trouble interpretting his message. not surprising consider 'phenomology of spirit' might be one of the most verbose and complicated works of modern philosophy outside of kant's stuff. but yeah, 5'd for awesome geekiness.
June 1st, 2006
(0)
terrible
June 1st, 2006
(0)
bullsh*t
June 1st, 2006
(0)
5 from a philosophy major, and for "f*ck philo" since that's one of Hume's characters
June 1st, 2006
(0)
i've always loved the lol fad. i've always loved smart humor as well.
June 1st, 2006
(0)
rofl
June 1st, 2006
(0)
and lol categorical imperative
June 1st, 2006
(0)
KANT BE!
June 1st, 2006
(0)
lol
(0)
damn whoever stole my idea of starting the philosopher's song!
June 1st, 2006
(0)
Damnit this is a stupid audience, keep it stupid, im not gonna go research the guy just so i can understand the joke!
June 1st, 2006
(0)
lol wow
June 1st, 2006
(0)
lol, crappy fad! also cocks
June 1st, 2006
(0)
it's funny because it's pretentious!
(0)
I hope this was a project for school
June 1st, 2006
(0)
That hippie and his catagories.
June 1st, 2006
(0)
+5 to me for getting it
June 1st, 2006
(0)
not even funny, suck a dick
June 1st, 2006
(0)
Very funny, don't suck a dick
June 1st, 2006
(0)
lol at smartness!
June 1st, 2006
(0)
5'd for making morons whine
June 1st, 2006
(0)
I 5'd it. Deos taht meen im srmat!/.
June 1st, 2006
(0)
i kant believe it's not butter!
(0)
-1 because I had to write a long-ass essay about him last semester.
(0)
No.
June 2nd, 2006
(0)
noticed sound is broken. -2
June 2nd, 2006
(0)
"noticed sound is broken." That's a problem on your end not mine.
June 2nd, 2006
(0)
we need a lol denis diderot indeed. and a lol rousseau while we're at it.
June 2nd, 2006
(0)
There's that ParasiteDragon idiot again. The one without any sites. Don't listen to him. Philosophers make for good YTMNDs.
June 2nd, 2006
(0)
Philosophy = instant 5
June 2nd, 2006
(0)
5'd for philosophy
(0)
One'd, because Kant was a horrible philosopher. I'd take Bertrand Russell, Richard Dawkins, and Daniel Dennett over Kant's tripe. Compatibilism, FTW!
June 2nd, 2006
(0)
HAY FOOK YOU!!
June 3rd, 2006
(0)
I don't normally vote for "inside jokes" but you posted this knowing it was obscure.
June 3rd, 2006
(0)
Kant pwns Bentham, but perhaps not Mill.
June 3rd, 2006
(0)
Commit an action whereby thou wills it to be universalized. Treat humanity as an end itself, never as a means to an end. Act whereby through your actions you are a legislating member of the universal kingdom of ends. :(
June 21st, 2006
(0)
"NO sh*t, would i be complaining about just any old *sshole?" -You have a point.
June 21st, 2006
(0)
>>> and a lol rousseau while we're at it.
June 21st, 2006
(0)
>>> and a lol rousseau while we're at it.
June 21st, 2006
(0)
"and a lol rousseau while we're at it."If someone does a philospohe, make it Voltaire. He pwns the others. Also, sorry for the three posts. The YTMND post service sucks.
June 26th, 2006
(0)
^^ someone needs to make a 'best day ever' ytmnd for candide.
June 26th, 2006
(0)
bah, can't just delete old comment, but... http://candide.ytmnd.com
July 23rd, 2006
(0)
the balogna is in the nest, the pastrami is recyclable.
July 28th, 2006
(0)
YTMND needs more philosophy. This has to get a 5 simply to prove that a thought can even survive here.
August 13th, 2006
(0)
unstoppable!
October 26th, 2006
(0)
After reading the feedback, iwpoe's comments make this worthy of a 5 by themselves.