ebaum hosts child pornography
Created on: July 17th, 2006
ebaum hosts child pornography
http://ebaumsworld.com/maxi-pad-mummy.html Just getting the word out. *note* Censoring child porn is not going to lead to you losing your free speech on the internet. Get real people.

Sponsorships:

Vote metrics:

rating total votes favorites comments
(3.65) 697 5 464

View metrics:

today yesterday this week this month all time
0 2 1 0 34,538

Inbound links:

views url
5 http://netcomber.com
2 http://us.m.yahoo.com/w/search/%3B_ylt=A2KIP65fx7BP8wEA2ylQ5tw4?
1 http://archives.depotoir.ca/index.php?showtopic=6317&hl
1 http://forums.joe.to/viewtopic.php?f=144&t=33154&start=240
1 http://www.bing.com/search?pc=ARRD&q=kiddie+porn&first=451&FORM=

Add a comment

Please login or register to comment.
<< 1 2 >>
July 17th, 2006
(0)
maybe he will get shut down or something if we report it
July 17th, 2006
(0)
yeah someones already started a petetion, doubt that would go anywhere...
July 17th, 2006
(0)
f*ckING REPORT HIM!
July 17th, 2006
(0)
EWWWW!!!! EBAUMSWORLD!
July 17th, 2006
(0)
is that tampons?
July 17th, 2006
(0)
f*ck you Ebaumsworld. That telemarketing lady needs to call ebaums
July 17th, 2006
(0)
https://secure.missingkids.com/missingkids/servlet/CybertipServlet?LanguageCountry=en_US
(0)
ah yes, because clearly a child in a state of undress is considered child pornography and is meant to be erotic.
July 17th, 2006
(0)
I was just linked to ebaumsworld to look at kiddie porn. Does it get any worse?
July 17th, 2006
(0)
Y'know, innocent or not, I'd never show a picture like that to anyone if it featured my son.
July 17th, 2006
(0)
1'd because Brian Peppers is not f*cking funny.
July 17th, 2006
(0)
Holy Jesus...
July 17th, 2006
(0)
meh, tv shows babie's butts all the time, this is not pornography, its a kid playing with maxi pads
July 17th, 2006
(0)
fap?..........fapfapfapfapfapfap............................................................................................ok someone can go ahead and report him now, I mean really, it is just disgusting.
July 17th, 2006
(0)
pretty gross but i think youre over reacting
July 17th, 2006
(0)
...
July 17th, 2006
(0)
I'm not checking out the link, but I'll 5 this for now to get more people to see it.
July 17th, 2006
(0)
whatever i'm just looking for an excuse to delete ebaumsworld.com
July 17th, 2006
(0)
www.cybertipline.com
July 17th, 2006
(0)
Maybe because Eric Bauman is a member of NAMBLA?
July 17th, 2006
(0)
SHUT THE f*ckER DOWN!
(0)
OMG GAY
July 17th, 2006
(0)
Jihad on ebaums
July 17th, 2006
(0)
Err...um...
July 17th, 2006
(0)
5'd but i hope to never see that again
July 17th, 2006
(0)
|_ () |_
July 17th, 2006
(0)
I 1'd this, not becuase I like eBaum's but a pic of a kid dressed up stupid when he happens to be naked is not child pornography. I'm sure my mom has a pic of me running around the house in a cowboy hat climbing on a piano naked when I was 2, however, that does not make her a child pornographer. Has pedophilia hysteria in this gone that far?
July 17th, 2006
(0)
http://www.antichildporn.org/reportcp.html
(0)
I think you've got something very sensitive here. Time is of the essence. Make haste, young ones!
July 17th, 2006
(0)
yes ziggster, but that kid looks abused. plus it's hosted on the internet, not in your baby pictures. besides, i'd say anything to get ebaum in trouble.
July 17th, 2006
(0)
He'll just take it down.
July 17th, 2006
(0)
I saw that, and its f*cking WRONG. REPORT.
July 17th, 2006
(0)
what passes for humor over there is scarier than any pedophile.
July 17th, 2006
(0)
http://www.antichildporn.org/reportcp.html just do it!
July 17th, 2006
(0)
not a fan of ebaum, but you're a f*cking moron.
July 17th, 2006
(0)
whoever asked if those are tampons is a dumb sh*t
July 17th, 2006
(0)
reported it! f*ck ebaums
July 17th, 2006
(0)
reported
July 17th, 2006
(0)
this sucks. you suck.
July 17th, 2006
(0)
Hey, this is nothing compared to the way Neil used to violate Eric.
July 17th, 2006
(0)
wishful thiking
July 17th, 2006
(0)
lol theo that would explain lots
July 17th, 2006
(0)
If the pictures are not meant to be erotic in any form, it's not child pornography.
July 17th, 2006
(0)
That's wishful thinking but I don't see much development from that. It's informative but only 3 for the YTMND.
July 17th, 2006
(0)
it won't get Eric in trouble, he can pass the buck on his mods, and the person that uploaded the pic
(0)
OMG!
July 17th, 2006
(0)
as much as i dislike eric bauman, this is just assinine
July 17th, 2006
(0)
I say we burn him.
July 17th, 2006
(0)
i didnt want to see that
July 17th, 2006
(0)
im not clickin on the link but e-bauman is A TERRORIST.. A RAPIST.. A LIFE DESTROYER NASTY NASTY NASTY WORSE THAN ANYTHING WE'RE FIGHTING OVER IN IRAQ
July 17th, 2006
(0)
To be fair to Eric Bauman, he probably stole it. Zing!
July 17th, 2006
(0)
RUH ROH
July 17th, 2006
(0)
Why the f*ck would you steal that?
July 17th, 2006
(0)
Well what you can do is tell everyone that ebaums hosts child porngraphy. yep
July 17th, 2006
(0)
nasty
July 17th, 2006
(0)
How is that child pornogrophy if there is no nudity or sexual activites going on? I f*cking hate ebumas and want it shut down but this sucks. 1.
July 17th, 2006
(0)
eric and his pedophile dad are probably jacking off to it now. I HATE EBAUMSWORLD!
July 17th, 2006
(0)
or..... WE COULD SICK PETA ON THEM! http://www.ebaumsworld.com/videos/hungryanimals.html
July 17th, 2006
(0)
sick you can see it. SHUT THSES PERVS DOWN
July 17th, 2006
(0)
Actually the image is not pornographic by the justice system's definition of child pornography. The child is not uncovered nor is it engaged in any sexual situation, nor is it intended to be distributed for sexual purposes. This is no more child porn than naked baby pictures.
July 17th, 2006
(0)
yeah i saw that, too, and i was f*cking disgusted. first all the internet theft, and now hes hosting pictures i would consider to be pornographic and highly offensive, and for some god awful reason it hasnt been pulled yet.
July 17th, 2006
(0)
Indeed by working to get a site shut down on such triviality you could set a standard that would introduce vast swaths of censorship over the entirety of the internet including this very website. By indicating to politicians that you want things controlled on the internet you grant them motivation to control us all.
July 17th, 2006
(0)
BRB FBI
July 17th, 2006
(0)
child pornography is one thing that should be censored on the internets
(0)
3'd 'cause f*ck ebaum's. But seriously, this isn't child porn. You need to find something else to exploit, 'cause this isn't gonna work.
July 17th, 2006
(0)
He was a total *sshole, and nobody knows why.
July 17th, 2006
(0)
I hate iwpoe because he's exactly right. eBaum won't fall this day...
July 17th, 2006
(0)
f*ck ebaum's, good job.
July 17th, 2006
(0)
They will pay.
July 17th, 2006
(0)
best case: the people we report it to somehow get the news people to find out about it and he loses his TV show and more people hate him (if that's possible for more people to not like him..)
July 17th, 2006
(0)
Just because you don't find this picture to be considered pornographic doesnít mean some weirdos don't! Some sick bastard is probably wanking to it as we speak!
July 17th, 2006
(0)
unfortunatly...I don't think that counts as porn
July 17th, 2006
(0)
FBI, lets all call
July 17th, 2006
(0)
and some sicko could wank to any picture of any child on the internet, this property does not a pornographic image make. And it's no that I don't consider this pornographic; it's that standards of justice and reason don't consider it pornographic. In reality you all just want to destroy eBaums. I don't see any of you rallying to shut YTMND down because of the "girl caught flashing by her dad" site.
July 17th, 2006
(0)
Well this is just sick... ban ebaum from this world!
July 17th, 2006
(0)
saddly thats not child porn, thats a kid playing with pads and the result.... though I wish he did post CP so we could SUE!!
July 17th, 2006
(0)
That has to be child porn even if the child is covered up. ARREST EBAUM! GET THE FBI!!!!!!!!!!
July 17th, 2006
(0)
its not really pornography if nothing showing. It's just a little girl who was playing with tampons :/
July 17th, 2006
(0)
iwpoe you're right, if it were anywhere else i wouldn't care at all, we're just itching for an excuse to go after him. The media could turn this against him, reguardless of what the law is, however.
July 17th, 2006
(0)
Oh please god I did not want to see it. But I did believe it.
July 17th, 2006
(0)
I want media critique far far away from any part of the internet, even eBaums. I don't trust those bastards to handle anything in a reasonable manner. If it were up to the media we would have long since sealed our children in impervious bullet proof hamster balls, making sure to plug their ears and cover their eyes so that they are never damaged in any way by the reality of existence.
July 17th, 2006
(0)
well, you have a point
July 17th, 2006
(0)
REPORT HIM FOR CHILD PRON AND HAVE HIM LABELED AS A SEX OFFENDER!
July 17th, 2006
(0)
still, the media is here to stay so why not try and use it to our advantage for once i guess
July 17th, 2006
(1)
OH MY GAAAAAAAWWWWWWWWDDDDDDD! n64!
July 17th, 2006
(0)
actually i agree with Alexander on this one
July 17th, 2006
(0)
July 17th, 2006
(0)
I just believe that using the media in such a way could com back to bite us in the ass. If the heat is turned on site who host semi-offensive images whatís to keep them from turning on us? The whole world doesnít regard eBaumís like YTMND does. To them eBaumís is just another site and this would turn into a general internet censorship issue not an eBaum's destruction issue.
July 17th, 2006
(0)
That link was disturbing...I think I died a little bit inside...please kill ebaumsworld....
July 17th, 2006
(0)
Never know your luck. I hope to see the prick sued as much as possible before he gets shutdown though.
July 17th, 2006
(0)
Distasteful, yes. Pornographic, no.
July 17th, 2006
(0)
i do see what you're saying, but semi-offensive vs semi-child pornographic is different.. but then again the far left media loves sensoring so it could back fire.. who knows
July 17th, 2006
(0)
lol i just said sensoring instead of censoring.. damn i'm tired.
July 17th, 2006
(0)
http://www.sleazeroxx.com/censored/virgin1.jpg
July 17th, 2006
(0)
^go away ebaum.
July 17th, 2006
(0)
fap fap fap
July 17th, 2006
(0)
I like ur message, but the ytmnd isn't that great, so -1.
July 17th, 2006
(0)
OMFG u stolz tha song from albinoblksheep!! omfg!...
July 17th, 2006
(0)
All media loves censorship, unless you want to classify Fox's random internet, protect the children, protect our families, tie raids as brief moments of leftism in their vastly right universe.
July 17th, 2006
(0)
OMFG! that picture is SICK! Nail this bitch in his coffin once and for all!
July 17th, 2006
(0)
I agree with the basic sentiment of getting eBaum shut down but get realistic here if we were successful we'd just be setting ourselfs up for a similar over reaction twords YTMND. It dose prove however that ebaum is desprate for content.
July 17th, 2006
(0)
hah, that's cute, except for the fact that that child's parents are dispicable fools for posting it. it will embarrass the hell out of the poor boy for years to come, and some old men are undoubtedly masturbating to it. i think having that picture on the internet is a terrible, albeit entirely legal, decision.
July 17th, 2006
(0)
lol kid covered in tampooonz
July 17th, 2006
(0)
This is child pronography in the same sense that hentai is porn. Legally, hentai is to be censored over the genetals, but it is still considered porn. This child's "peepee" is censored by a pad, but the shape is still visable as would be in censored hentai. It is porn, it is a child, it is child porn.
(0)
I think legally that would qualify as child pornography. I don't think the kid's parents would want that on there.
July 18th, 2006
(0)
ewww
July 18th, 2006
(0)
nobody motherf*cking cares. You guys are just reapting that f*cking stupid Bauman hate bandwagon. Like you guys did back in Janurary. Nobody cares anymore, moron.
July 18th, 2006
(0)
Ok, it's not pornography at all...but still, why on earth would Ebaum host this? It's not funny, and I doubt many people would want to look at a baby covered in maxi pads (my mom and my grandma might find it funny @_@). So I'm not going to "report" ebaum, but I still think he's a sick f*ck and his site needs to be taken down.
July 18th, 2006
(0)
WTF? Sick
July 18th, 2006
(0)
submitted.
July 18th, 2006
(0)
I hate eric bauman, but really...this makes us look stupid. There's waaaay better stuff to call him on. A (most likely stolen) photo with some lil' kid covered in maxi-pads and calling it "child pornagraphy? That just sounds desperate. It would be a better shot just saying he jacked it from someone's site. Plus this lacks teh funny. duece
July 18th, 2006
(0)
THIS IS A DISGRACE,SHUT DOWN THE BASTARD
July 18th, 2006
(0)
that picture on ebaum's world, whether it be taken from somebody's family photos, or actual child abuse, is not funny, and should not be displayed as such. This only further shows how horrible eric baumann really is.
July 18th, 2006
(0)
not porn, just a very silly wrong image to put online!
July 18th, 2006
(0)
5 for lemon demon ebaums world sucks song.
July 18th, 2006
(0)
dude, thats seriosly f*cked up
(0)
think of the children! won't somebody please think of the children!
July 18th, 2006
(0)
I'd love to comment on this but I think I'm going to be sick. Where will it end Bauman you money loving b*st*rd?
July 18th, 2006
(0)
it's not child porn but this sure does suck
July 18th, 2006
(0)
"ah yes, because clearly a child in a state of undress is considered child pornography and is meant to be erotic."
July 18th, 2006
(0)
Hey, he uses small flaws to get at people, we can just as well do the same.
July 18th, 2006
(0)
well...that's f*cked up
July 18th, 2006
(0)
it's really not child porn but you really are all f*ggots
July 18th, 2006
(0)
grooooooooooossssssss
July 18th, 2006
(0)
There's a good case in that PETA argument though...
July 18th, 2006
(0)
"ah yes, because clearly a child in a state of undress is considered child pornography and is meant to be erotic."
July 18th, 2006
(0)
"It's not funny" I donít know, it's kind of funny, in the way photos your mom has of you running around the house naked when you were three are funny in an embarrassing way.
July 18th, 2006
(0)
Bauman is a pedophile!
July 18th, 2006
(0)
What the...? *deletes history*
July 18th, 2006
(0)
DUDE WHAT THE f*ck.
July 18th, 2006
(0)
dude, that's pretty sick right there.
July 18th, 2006
(0)
what the f*ck *kleenex*
July 18th, 2006
(0)
shocking..
July 18th, 2006
(0)
As good as the cause is, ever think about the kinds of pictures are hidden off in obscure ytmnd's?
July 18th, 2006
(0)
might help to add in a warning to the link, douchebag
July 18th, 2006
(0)
Eww, wtf why would you even put that on any website period. This is a new low.
July 18th, 2006
(0)
As bad as ebaumsworld is, this is not child pornography, it's a funny picture of the crazy things little kids do. Face it, this whole "REPORT EBAUMSWORLD" reaction is not actually because of the picture, you're just looking for an excuse (however invalid) to get back at the site. Fight back for real reasons, not pretexts. Don't sink to his level.
July 18th, 2006
(0)
Even Brian Peppers is offended.
(0)
That f*cking sicko!!!
July 18th, 2006
(0)
SICK FREAK
July 18th, 2006
(0)
lol 5 stars for lemon demon, and for exposing the truth about eric bauman
(0)
"yes ziggster, but that kid looks abused" The kid -looks- abused? That's just pathetic. STFU.
July 18th, 2006
(0)
BRING THIS f*ckER DOWN.
July 18th, 2006
(0)
shut this sick f*ck down
July 18th, 2006
(0)
Reported to wsacp.org, done and done
July 18th, 2006
(0)
well done, now every who visits it the link gives bauman money GJ!
July 18th, 2006
(0)
that's not childporn. :|
July 18th, 2006
(0)
using your definition of child pornography we'd have to shut down diaper commercials showing naked babies
July 18th, 2006
(0)
http://www.antichildporn.org/reportcp.html
July 18th, 2006
(0)
This is the worst YTMND ever.
July 18th, 2006
(0)
WTF! I CANNOT BELIEvE THAT IS ON THERE.
July 18th, 2006
(0)
OH MY GOD BRIAN NOOOO
July 18th, 2006
(0)
Because of the ads, doesn't ytmnd.com also make money off of stolen or illegally distributed media?
July 18th, 2006
(0)
Search google for report Child Porn, and report him. This is just another example of why eBaumsWorld should cease to exsist.
(0)
not child porn. kids do crazy sh*t. besides, he's covered up. petition to shut down ebaum for theft, not trumped up uber-pc charges of kiddy porn.
July 18th, 2006
(0)
It's a trap!
July 18th, 2006
(0)
WTF...
July 18th, 2006
(0)
so now everyoone at ytmnd has been once today to ebaumsworld..... nice going.... more dollars 4 eric...
July 18th, 2006
(0)
+5 for kiddie porn
July 18th, 2006
(0)
Let's report im to the Internet Police! Wait, we are the Internet Police. 2 For no originality.
July 18th, 2006
(0)
WTF
July 18th, 2006
(0)
ya its sick and needs to be reported.
July 18th, 2006
(0)
F*ck ebaums world but thats not really porn... anyone who finds that erotic is a sick sh*t also those arent maxi-pads theyre pantiliners, and the kids mom is a dumb bitch for leaving them out (and more importantly for letting this get onto the internet)
July 18th, 2006
(0)
You know, some Chris-chun will come along, see the pic, tell all his/her church buddies, and start a mass-email campaign, then eBaum will remove the pic and pretend it was never there. Our intervention will be moot.
July 18th, 2006
(0)
I think it is considered child pornography. Let me look in my law book. No... Damn... Only if it shows the sexual organs of the child does it count as child pornography. Unfortunately, this little kids sexual organs are covered. We COULD "edit" it... 5 because you attempted to shut down eBaums world. Gotta love that.
July 18th, 2006
(0)
based on other people's comments, you're stretching a bit.
July 18th, 2006
(0)
im stating the obvious, but thats f*cking gross.
July 18th, 2006
(0)
That is sick.
July 18th, 2006
(0)
Why that son of a bitch!
July 18th, 2006
(0)
it's not funny because it looks like someone just stuck them on the kid, not the kid doing it himself. It's clearly not child porn. Ebaumsworld sucks but reporting them is stupid and just makes it harder for REAL child porn to be investigated. Also this ytmnd sucks
July 18th, 2006
(0)
"Maybe because Eric Bauman is a member of NAMBLA?" lol...
July 18th, 2006
(0)
sick
July 18th, 2006
(0)
reported to ASACP
July 18th, 2006
(0)
And I reported Eric Bauman, not you, ac6517
July 18th, 2006
(0)
wasabi54 - According to the ASACP, even suggestive (clothed) pics, even if the clothes are maxi-pads, are reportable.
July 18th, 2006
(0)
you spend too much time at ebaums.
July 18th, 2006
(0)
BRB FBI
July 18th, 2006
(0)
BUT IT'S HILARIOUS CHILD PORNOGRAPHY!
July 18th, 2006
(0)
i swear to god, if you guys took the energy you put into hating ebaum, and applied it somewhere useful, it would be really impressive.
July 18th, 2006
(0)
thats gross
July 18th, 2006
(0)
feedback@usanetwork.com
July 18th, 2006
(0)
Email USA at feedback@usanetwork.com shut the show down before it starts.
July 18th, 2006
(0)
Disturbing, but hardly pornographic.
July 18th, 2006
(0)
GROSS
July 18th, 2006
(0)
Sent a report. Maybe ebaums will go down for once!
July 18th, 2006
(0)
all i have to say is wtf. thats disgusting the kid must be tormented by this.
(0)
that baby gave me a boner
July 18th, 2006
(0)
eBaum F T L
July 18th, 2006
(0)
ya you're pretty f*cking stupid
(0)
:O
July 18th, 2006
(0)
WTF THAT SICK BASTARD.
July 18th, 2006
(0)
Hahahahahahaha. It's not really porn if 1) there's actually no genetalia being shown or 2) the kid is being sexually exploited. -4 for not understanding the law.
(0)
This ytmnd makes us all look bad
July 18th, 2006
(0)
5 cuz someone said assinine in the comments -- what a great word!
July 18th, 2006
(0)
AMPERSAND POUND EIGHTY-SIX
July 18th, 2006
(0)
That kid's lucky he doesn't have any pubes yet.
July 18th, 2006
(0)
IMHO, the maxi'ed groin seals the deal.
July 18th, 2006
(0)
how does this piece of sh*t get away with that
July 18th, 2006
(0)
Sick sonnuva bitch
July 18th, 2006
(0)
how do people not think this is child porn? if angelina jolie wore something barely covering her parts, people would think its hawt, but because people here saying it's not child porn and they arent pedophiles, they dont see it as hawt, but a pedophile would. im sure its been said, but its so obvious
July 18th, 2006
(0)
It has a child in it, but as probably most people have pointed out by now, it isn't pornographic. It's wacky kid hijinks. You're not accomplishing anything by initiating a cheap attack by reporting this to the authorities. You're merely sinking down to ebaum's level.
July 18th, 2006
(0)
Thats WRONG WRONG WRONG. ebaumsworld is WRONG
July 18th, 2006
(0)
LOL @ all the pedos saying this isnt child porn. I hope you all burn.
July 18th, 2006
(0)
The people who think this is child porn are the perverts.
July 18th, 2006
(0)
wtf eww
July 18th, 2006
(0)
"ah yes, because clearly a child in a state of undress is considered child pornography and is meant to be erotic."
July 18th, 2006
(0)
Gross
July 18th, 2006
(0)
owned by their own watermark. how ironic
July 18th, 2006
(0)
gross
July 18th, 2006
(0)
Although it's kinda nasty, I DOUBT it's blatant child porn, considering the age of the child (prolly like 3) and the humourous context. I mean, I have tons of pics from when I was that kid's age where I'm swimming buck-naked and I doubt that qualifies as kiddie porn. And, no, you can't have those pics ;)
July 18th, 2006
(0)
eBaum's used to have REAL child porn (naked 13ish year old girl) in their Moron Mail, but I guess they got rid of it...
July 18th, 2006
(0)
sh*tty YTMND.I don't want to look at childporn either.If it concerns you that much,report it.
July 18th, 2006
(0)
Erm,how did you find this too?
July 18th, 2006
(0)
DUDE YUCK WTF!!!!! WHERES THE f*ckING PETITION
July 18th, 2006
(0)
EWWW WTF
July 18th, 2006
(0)
ebaum is going down....someday.
July 18th, 2006
(0)
that's just disgusting and wrong
July 18th, 2006
(0)
ALERT THE INTERNET!
July 18th, 2006
(0)
I hate ebaumsworld as much as anyone, but only because they steal content, I wouldn't bust them for crude stuff like this, anyone heard of the ytmnd forums or alol?
July 18th, 2006
(0)
That doesn't look like child pornography. "but that kid looks abused." No, it looks like the little girl got into the pads, then her mom got mad, but her dad just thought "Awwww how cute." I sense no abuse.
July 18th, 2006
(0)
What a sick f*ck
July 18th, 2006
(0)
There is also "boy's first boner"...
July 18th, 2006
(0)
Gross, let's kick his ass.
July 18th, 2006
(0)
Eww. Just eww.
July 18th, 2006
(0)
ALERT TEH INTERNET@@20210111!!!
July 18th, 2006
(0)
holy sh*t!!!!
July 18th, 2006
(0)
this is not pornography by any means.
July 18th, 2006
(0)
I feel like the FBI is on my pc now.
July 18th, 2006
(0)
f*ck eBaum. I wish that site was like 4chan and had a "Report" button
July 18th, 2006
(0)
lol sick
July 18th, 2006
(0)
Aww f*ck, Somethingaswful will have his head. >:D
(0)
That's no good.
July 18th, 2006
(0)
ewwWWEWWWWwewwwww
July 18th, 2006
(0)
YOU TRAITOR WHY WOULD U EVEN BE ON EBAUMS THE IN THE FIRST PLACE GO KILL YOURSELF!!!!!
July 18th, 2006
(0)
DONE! REPORTED
July 18th, 2006
(0)
Bauman NOOOOOOO
(0)
Oh. My. God. O_o;
(0)
Well if you look at Eric and Neil...they do look like the type of people who'd do this kind of thing to their neighbors' kids.
July 18th, 2006
(0)
Dude, there's a pic of a little kid with his dick in a bowl of cerial on some site that people pass along for fun, at least the kid on eBaums is covering up.
July 18th, 2006
(0)
ok why the f*ck did someone think of taking a pic like that anyway?
July 18th, 2006
(0)
ewwwwwww
July 18th, 2006
(0)
*epic shutting down eBaums world manuever* Reported
(0)
im glad you didnt show it...
July 18th, 2006
(0)
To those who say that the only person who'll get in trouble is the user who uploaded the pic, this is untrue. Eric allowed this content to posted on his website, therefore he can still get into major trouble for allowing this to be up on his website
July 18th, 2006
(0)
Doesn't sync
(0)
1'd for giving more traffic to eBaums, because it is apparently not porn (I refuse to visit the site for any reason, and so should you), and because by reporting stupid stuff, you open the door for possible censorship around here and elsewhere on the internet.
July 18th, 2006
(0)
What a f*ggot.
July 18th, 2006
(0)
Just reported him, woo.
July 18th, 2006
(0)
icky poo poo pants
July 18th, 2006
(0)
btw, I didn't even think if this was child porn or not - I just looked at it and was immidiatly freaked, and my instincts tell me something like that should be reported, even if it isn't strictly pornographic. I mean over here (the UK), you're not even aloud to tape school plays or sports days any more. I'm not kidding, it's been halted by the goddamn government.
July 18th, 2006
(0)
Disgusting f*cks.
<< 1 2 >>